Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
about
Is low dose vaginal misoprostol better than dinoprostone gel for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled StudyTailoring systematic reviews to meet critical priorities in maternal health in the intrapartum period.Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.Induction of Labor in Post-Term Nulliparous and Parous Women - Potential Advantages of Misoprostol over DinoprostoneEffect of Saffron (Fan Hong Hua) On the Readiness of The Uterine Cervix In Term Pregnancy: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.Current pharmacotherapy options for labor induction.Contributions to the dynamics of cervix remodeling prior to term and preterm birth.The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach.Induction of labor in women with a uterine scar.Oral misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for active management of premature rupture of membranes at term.Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients.Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus.A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial comparing stepwise oral misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour.
P2860
Q34479929-AE55BB36-EE71-4477-8FFF-03D60A4C9A1FQ36531877-656E6578-1FEA-4305-AFAC-4525EC4E899CQ37072914-1E2DCF98-4BBA-464C-A45B-C6B58450786AQ37072917-8F14C3EF-5A9D-4511-A75F-C7DA2D915CE7Q37210925-183566D5-98A9-489E-AEF5-B49DD23F088AQ37617789-C498C801-4A31-4C69-B417-D0E839AD73A7Q38042160-35DA73A6-AA83-4010-A449-83341A827A4FQ39232248-F9F4EE63-1A82-438C-9C58-F0290AF35BB7Q39353686-AE889DF2-AEFC-4774-8290-9B32732B7789Q40176204-76484C20-A487-4E79-8605-C94939AF48F8Q46046324-D1E6FAFD-3465-487B-A3EA-B7AB12A9383EQ46069713-4F2EC303-FA95-4793-A7AD-B4899F9F1ADFQ46321055-0EF617E9-7AAE-4536-8847-5B5C4E95B303Q46868743-1FE234E6-8B99-49F4-A15D-719EBBF2A09CQ46931132-50D05E6B-FF7A-40EE-8F6B-3427E8037DB3Q53206211-E0AB58EE-BAA5-498A-99EE-F1CB13299B1B
P2860
Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2006 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
name
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@ast
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@en
type
label
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@ast
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@ast
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P1476
Misoprostol compared with pros ...... e cervix: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1471-0528.2006.01111.X
P577
2006-12-01T00:00:00Z