The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
about
Systematic Review: Vitamin D and Cardiometabolic OutcomesEarly and late renal adverse effects after potentially nephrotoxic treatment for childhood cancerA Framework for Enhancing the Value of Research for Dissemination and ImplementationOutcomes, outcomes, every where, nor any stop to think?CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsSevere events in donors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donationSoluble Urokinase Receptors in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Review on the Scientific Point of ViewRecommendations for observational studies of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis.How to Develop an Electronic Clinical Endometriosis Research File Integrated in Clinical PracticeHerpes simplex virus type 2 and HIV disease progression: a systematic review of observational studiesComplication rates as a trauma care performance indicator: a systematic reviewCancer incidence in systemic sclerosis: meta-analysis of population-based cohort studiesReduced risk of lung cancer with metformin therapy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysisClinical and laboratory features that distinguish dengue from other febrile illnesses in endemic populationsMeeting report: atmospheric pollution and human reproductionRelationship of depression in participants with nonspecific acute or subacute low back pain and no-pain by age distributionCautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.Validity of the Immediate Post Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).Managing and monitoring chronic non-communicable diseases in a primary health care clinic, Lilongwe, Malawi.Does maternal HSV-2 coinfection increase mother-to-child transmission of HIV? A systematic review.Criteria for evaluation of novel markers of cardiovascular risk: a scientific statement from the American Heart AssociationAre pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions.Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensus.Cyberbullying Prevalence Among US Middle and High School-Aged Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy.Blood product transfusion in emergency department patients: a case-control study of practice patterns and impact on outcomeCritical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist.Recommendations for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.Harmonizing post-market surveillance of prescription drug misuse: a systematic review of observational studies using routinely collected data (2000-2013).Is transcription of data on antiretroviral treatment from electronic to paper-based registers reliable in Malawi?Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis.Low creatine kinase is associated with a high population incidence of faintingComparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions.Overestimates of survival after HAART: implications for global scale-up effortsDisagreement in primary study selection between systematic reviews on negative pressure wound therapy.A survey of the management of urinary tract infection in children in primary care and comparison with the NICE guidelinesGuidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines.Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer.Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: a comparison with other oral antidiabetic agents.Guidance in author instructions of hematology and oncology journals: A cross sectional and longitudinal study.
P2860
Q22305327-9F3EC0AE-32D2-4548-8317-601083EFCA78Q24197545-88B86D61-7A40-4CFC-B7EC-F2CD76BB1F81Q24282580-25CDF4F6-90A7-48AB-8107-3228AAFDE93FQ24289467-93A438F4-A518-4102-A16C-6E83610E8A4DQ24614627-E678476D-9EC7-42AC-9B89-A7BBB0934F7EQ24649646-E898A7E9-D6E2-489C-AAE7-3060E4BDBCDEQ26738374-A81C4CFF-5AC6-407D-8525-9F0467B29F9DQ26766688-6A2152C0-BEB6-4D40-AAF5-85A3C08E5BF5Q26799186-CF44FFBA-1C92-459F-8D7E-56CDCC71AECBQ26861777-8F977AEF-7AFA-4381-84B7-116D3852462CQ26862443-088F73F7-41AF-44B8-87BF-29B770A47B76Q26998770-7E7DFD46-21EC-4B45-8F4E-3F55A7D76DB9Q27025309-ECF4FC76-4C5C-4C93-A033-6A91287D3775Q27489850-5FB61289-6A8D-46C4-A889-9B8761B25A67Q28757901-B6307A06-D99A-48D0-9478-3DB420E75B47Q29247961-5C8BCBE3-7C3B-41ED-81B3-9ABB87D41E93Q30249320-581A1300-2699-4A7E-A671-72C37F3AF208Q30251599-12EF6977-3453-4DF2-A8FA-370B2390053CQ30383123-27251CD9-47DA-4879-AAE4-D24885C97184Q30402908-D7DD9150-49B5-4083-B804-6A6A17490BC5Q30434464-AF874E7E-CBE5-4A80-ACBB-D0BC85F6FAFBQ30484925-2DBDE51E-7697-4E67-9FA2-B42CB6C2D26AQ30699551-48052DD6-EEEC-4D2C-87AD-9E686C815464Q30700361-BE156DCA-54E0-4272-976F-2286C7B83397Q30836462-E18E6E3A-CA31-49F7-89C6-984BC3F376C0Q30837280-1830020D-8CB2-4B1F-B5BD-F0928EC7F4E6Q30860218-B8B9FCDB-4066-432A-B30A-1642AA877207Q30925093-E5B82D4F-6CB7-4A44-B20B-B93FCD4572ABQ30950812-52E6109E-5B09-47A2-A06F-4E07A75C402FQ30995485-EE24D45F-E12E-4782-A1ED-D8821B997E25Q31130060-369F2EB9-C8B4-4774-87D6-3EB4839ECB7CQ33157439-1E4943ED-C868-4874-A5C7-B246F46767CBQ33163019-C88B6ADD-B9FE-476D-9EB0-E12A0EDDA6C5Q33322531-6B51CD30-BB19-4DA9-B234-314677E60B51Q33346969-E3744149-6476-4F01-B164-BC80DDAC2397Q33526690-B83CF829-1C66-4E2A-B373-923FD035B808Q33532614-9CBB10CD-A35F-4077-B2A2-05735AC86EE3Q33549627-5C946C1D-2460-43F0-ABA4-FE3E5F1934C9Q33561519-C7D0C1A6-FA14-40F5-B165-4552B5DDEFF1Q33614639-11119CD1-552E-4203-93F2-242B99821EB5
P2860
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@ast
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@en
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
type
label
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@ast
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@en
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
prefLabel
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@ast
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@en
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
@nl
P2093
P50
P1476
The Strengthening the Reportin ...... porting observational studies.
@en
P2093
Jan P Vandenbroucke
STROBE Initiative
Stuart J Pocock
P304
P356
10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
P407
P577
2007-10-01T00:00:00Z