In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
about
Current sample size conventions: flaws, harms, and alternativesCONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsReporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: reviewEscitalopram and neuroendocrine response in healthy first-degree relatives to depressed patients--a randomized placebo-controlled trialDelta inflation: a bias in the design of randomized controlled trials in critical care medicine.Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.Periodontal health status and bacteraemia from daily oral activities: systematic review/meta-analysis.The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systemsEffect of selenium supplementation on CD4 T-cell recovery, viral suppression, morbidity and quality of life of HIV-infected patients in Rwanda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Sample Size Calculation: Inaccurate A Priori Assumptions for Nuisance Parameters Can Greatly Affect the Power of a Randomized Controlled Trial.The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviewsA comprehensive appraisal of meta-analyses focusing on nonsurgical treatments aimed at decreasing perioperative mortality or major cardiac complications.Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010.Methodological quality of systematic reviews addressing femoroacetabular impingement.Impact of a store-and-forward teledermatology intervention versus usual care on delay before beginning treatment: A pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in ambulatory care.An overview of systematic reviews on the effectiveness of periodontal treatment to improve glycaemic control.The role of dressings in the prevention of pressure ulcers.Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individualsBreaking free of sample size dogma to perform innovative translational research.Comparison of 3 Knee-Specific Quality-of-Life Instruments for Patients With Meniscal Tears.Characteristics of Effective Interventions Promoting Healthy Eating for Pre-Schoolers in Childcare Settings: An Umbrella Review.Evidence-based practice in psychiatric and mental health nursing: qualitative meta-synthesis.Key design considerations for adaptive clinical trials: a primer for clinicians.Are There Modifiable Environmental Factors Related to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis?Statistical primer: sample size and power calculations-why, when and how?
P2860
Q24288939-CEA63E2F-5B0E-4B4C-A962-2FBC072E0A80Q24614627-99F1D4ED-E555-4032-8682-8D169F8C175FQ24645630-55F616CE-5B71-48E0-BF82-22FB778D83F7Q28743211-686EECA7-9038-4F1C-9048-FD4673D698B3Q30435820-DCCD60A9-8A71-4100-AF74-B0D6DE295753Q33521365-A1A8427C-2A0C-400F-AC54-1D3039621048Q34076645-A1650085-719C-4E8B-9EF5-71377CA3C164Q35048795-6F81B0E4-2EC9-4DA6-A3CF-CBE383933AE3Q35240769-2F2DC1B7-64E8-4A71-94B1-044E7B7B9C31Q35690966-7254FDBB-93E7-4DD2-9A6C-DEC259256590Q36721160-92735D79-7DBD-4511-B021-186AAB160A4CQ38000047-6F03138A-5DAF-4088-A236-F32442C55C0BQ38112559-E81F7F7D-8807-48DF-9C19-EC87F613EB79Q38231148-446B52CD-5E0E-4E1C-8DA6-E30C86F63DE7Q38389149-FAB8CC53-9C4E-4B98-A9AF-30FC8AD674ACQ38749416-0F01104C-4DC5-4C36-B7D9-D736745E6B3CQ38927487-ECBF4B82-EE71-4BAA-BE6C-246F8E94A229Q39834471-ABC159C5-F474-4B8B-972E-CDC2E116B898Q42117164-2F556DD0-84A5-4F7F-8F3D-754ADB76985BQ49233017-D1C96075-A338-4A6C-AA8C-60FF399265FAQ51150357-5F98FD1E-9884-49B6-9E54-17898B40D40AQ51878455-A176C647-72BC-4732-9B9A-CA9C421EB2BFQ53080004-E5F251DB-4203-4625-99FF-1606A9ABF7C6Q54967565-0C42E59A-874F-45C4-AA23-4BA39675B540Q55425477-6CF27250-0F33-49CE-B554-E67F498B7111
P2860
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@ast
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@en
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@nl
type
label
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@ast
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@en
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@nl
prefLabel
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@ast
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@en
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
@en
P2093
Edward J Mills
P2860
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.0050004
P407
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z