Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
about
Applications of text mining within systematic reviewsA scoping review of rapid review methodsTaking knowledge users' knowledge needs into account in health: an evidence synthesis framework.Fostering more-effective public health by identifying administrative evidence-based practices: a review of the literatureWhat are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid reviewQuality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods.Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviewsExpediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.Lessons drawn from research utilization in the maternal iodine supplementation policy development in Thailand.Efficiency and contribution of strategies for finding randomized controlled trials: a case study from a systematic review on therapeutic interventions of chronic depression.Addressing health inequalities in the delivery of the human papillomavirus vaccination programme: examining the role of the school nurse"Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the methodInterventions to improve the performance of HIV health systems for treatment-as-prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: the experimental evidenceUsing text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approachesMethods of a multi-faceted rapid knowledge synthesis project to inform the implementation of a new health service model: Collaborative Emergency Centres.Value of databases other than medline for rapid health technology assessments.The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studiesUSING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean: a rapid review of clinical protocols, and an umbrella review of systematic reviews.The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviewsEconomic evaluation of highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm-injection cycles in Sweden.Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies.Incorporating evidence review into quality improvement: meeting the needs of innovators.Expediting evidence synthesis for healthcare decision-making: exploring attitudes and perceptions towards rapid reviews using Q methodology.Development of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment.Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health.Five shared decision-making tools in 5 months: use of rapid reviews to develop decision boxes for seniors living with dementia and their caregivers.How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments.Use of genomic profiling to assess risk for cardiovascular disease and identify individualized prevention strategies--a targeted evidence-based review.KNOW ESSENTIALS: a tool for informed decisions in the absence of formal HTA systems.The long-term cost-effectiveness of obesity prevention interventions: systematic literature review.The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges ahead.Modes of delivery in preventive intervention studies: a rapid review.Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agencies.Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology.Barriers and facilitators influencing ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda.
P2860
Q24289527-7B1A143A-8B47-4079-88EA-BC4F82CD8EA8Q26786066-335CB2E5-52BE-4F11-A7B8-FB1C8E76F4D3Q26795672-9EA5617B-7C5B-4A16-8A40-A3FBFBF594E9Q26852419-94769EA2-C855-4A52-8B37-313E3AC4BC7DQ28074678-32A1DFC8-5613-46C9-AA52-BF27B7796D7EQ30383894-D076B58D-D0FC-40F2-BD4A-55160BED5902Q30485117-CB0F783F-598F-4668-B27D-7CC8E8F8BDA7Q30642721-F8E56E15-A42A-46C7-8349-250343E3ECFEQ30839151-BF70F011-9E7D-44A3-B195-4F9C97E777B6Q34036655-C1258A88-82F2-4952-9498-1F36D6370C76Q34285939-E60828E5-1B0F-443D-AC88-5CCC42B9F13DQ34391270-42C16D70-7769-478C-BEA9-6D505988D3F5Q34426761-969AE866-4613-4E01-8958-011E3E024FD0Q34622418-E5F15C47-AAC3-42F9-ACFB-AF14248677E4Q34990011-7787A21C-C474-49AD-8887-D3413B1588E0Q35060250-AA906596-89FD-4571-AAF0-8E3767A89B9DQ35060323-7F3E4C6B-989B-4460-BEA4-FD6BD68E008DQ35158748-3259C372-0308-4CBB-8339-429778287DEEQ36113531-DCBE863D-83E3-456C-9F70-90650547BC34Q36165515-96988DBF-21D5-4B6A-8C22-9BE2D6CFD2DAQ36276258-F555D2CD-4372-4AC5-9508-F41CBC2C2AD5Q36315305-9B856178-6297-4145-88CA-F9833FF62BD3Q36721160-0589ABFA-73D3-412B-BD88-FC1C8C4F2CF9Q37099603-D580A359-CE28-4D06-A5A4-2DB8872F5A0BQ37188802-54AB60E6-C3CE-4CA2-B975-367BE0DDFDC5Q37267667-E244F28A-3D07-40FA-94DE-4D70F70081E6Q37347182-107A714C-26AC-4CD1-814F-DB1AF5ACFD7DQ37509234-015A594E-6001-4D98-A60D-DB5F4BF92F88Q37560869-C480E3CF-B947-472C-8DDD-3481A422D71DQ37704850-733DF8DD-D145-4DC2-92EF-510B7054626BQ37798070-AC54C4C4-BA8F-491E-9CF2-3D212EACD5ADQ37806581-7167344F-D751-4114-8C96-C4E46FA03C41Q37859118-99F46F4B-F715-40FC-98E5-C41C9F8ABD95Q37976483-6DB85633-C4C3-4D20-8B17-5AE2C84278DFQ38074877-63D81A35-E94E-4077-B993-2EE2BF78DF4DQ38211807-0FBB0256-6C8C-437F-8D0A-3F8AE38ED3A1Q38520048-B15B44A6-1237-4458-BD90-2CBAFFDF6BD5Q38540191-2625C0D1-7834-4A7E-AD49-A4A0C73CD2FDQ38548012-EF8D72C7-1CC6-4368-BF64-558BA5DA3D2EQ38592987-70C17E1E-DE06-486A-A2D9-DCE83AA6382D
P2860
Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@ast
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@en
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@nl
type
label
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@ast
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@en
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@nl
prefLabel
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@ast
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@en
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Rapid reviews versus full syst ...... health technology assessment.
@en
P2093
Alun Cameron
Amber Watt
Guy Maddern
Inger Norderhaug
Karen Facey
Lana Sturm
Stephen Blamey
Timothy Lathlean
Wendy Babidge
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S0266462308080185
P50
P577
2008-01-01T00:00:00Z