Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
about
What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in FinlandGovernance factors in the identification of global conservation priorities for mammalsComplete, accurate, mammalian phylogenies aid conservation planning, but not muchA climatic stability approach to prioritizing global conservation investmentsCheap and nasty? The potential perils of using management costs to identify global conservation prioritiesCost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation.The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.Characterizing spatial uncertainty when integrating social data in conservation planning.Why conservation planning needs socioeconomic data.Integrating economic costs and biological traits into global conservation priorities for carnivoresPrioritizing land and sea conservation investments to protect coral reefsThe importance of conserving biodiversity outside of protected areas in mediterranean ecosystems.Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.Investing in threatened species conservation: does corruption outweigh purchasing power?Ecosystem services in conservation planning: targeted benefits vs. co-benefits or costs?Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection.Ecoregion-based conservation planning in the Mediterranean: dealing with large-scale heterogeneity.Prioritizing conservation investments for mammal species globallyLarge-scale conservation planning in a multinational marine environment: cost matters.The efficiency of indicator groups for the conservation of amphibians in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest.Enhancing ecosystem restoration efficiency through spatial and temporal coordinationConstraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.Sensitivity analysis of conservation targets in systematic conservation planning.Sympathy for the Devil: Detailing the Effects of Planning-Unit Size, Thematic Resolution of Reef Classes, and Socioeconomic Costs on Spatial Priorities for Marine Conservation.Inclusion of costs in conservation planning depends on limited datasets and hopeful assumptions.Simple rules can guide whether land- or ocean-based conservation will best benefit marine ecosystemsCost-effective conservation decisions are robust to uncertainty in the species-area relationship.Incorporating uncertainty of management costs in sensitivity analyses of matrix population models.Global meta-analysis reveals low consistency of biodiversity congruence relationships.Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection.Intraspecific morphological and genetic variation of common species predicts ranges of threatened ones.Landowners’ ability to leverage in negotiations over habitat conservationThe global distribution of tetrapods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservationHot moments for biodiversity conservationHow much is new information worth? Evaluating the financial benefit of resolving management uncertaintyBarometer of Life: More Action, Not More DataSpatial conservation priorities are highly sensitive to choice of biodiversity surrogates and species distribution model typeThe influence of planning unit characteristics on the efficiency and spatial pattern of systematic conservation planning assessmentsBiodiversity, Governance, and the Allocation of International Aid for Conservation
P2860
Q28608353-BB795719-5CBB-43FE-AAD1-5702B6AD373AQ28742369-62AF4371-216A-4503-ADBF-08250FEB06C2Q28742374-17DBFBD2-5B35-4E8F-9479-0DD863896A2AQ28744532-A05DCB0D-E717-493B-B61B-28C77456AA79Q30392835-B7248CCA-247E-43FE-826B-B7715BD156C5Q30397936-FC1640D3-8174-4B4D-8E76-41AD43508511Q30868508-D6D62553-81D1-4D43-96DA-126D34CE0251Q30868512-4935C1C2-C7F9-4221-8F49-FFE48B5BBB02Q31154060-D80D02BA-F2C8-4E9A-A451-CD4369E300E0Q33497319-E6C08BB6-527E-42C4-871B-B1C0788619D6Q33683335-26EDA8E9-E62D-4948-9B22-5180B8AE8DADQ33797713-4007B4DF-06EC-4BF9-A752-465180D2DF10Q33799935-404EE648-32DF-4D47-B364-99C160DB723BQ33983410-68608793-AE5D-44E4-B15D-30DA1D831198Q34019001-07187789-E3C2-4C0A-AE2D-399C6E61F62FQ34659062-8557ABB7-4527-44B6-B427-B8897E948ABFQ35019285-DA605591-40FA-4E2B-9F39-80A6AE9D2381Q35025286-4B390749-49B8-47D4-AF4D-9F63A40474C8Q35119393-685BF772-5FCB-4287-B2D8-BDDC462820E3Q35231142-EF10139C-D43B-4EF9-BA1E-55A797936D32Q35380825-BB6074DE-3ADA-48A1-B925-0827BFD30312Q35616256-DC575900-7A7F-448F-A3CF-F46A8278F108Q35804550-CD0E5741-84D8-4B35-BA71-583CF9B0F53DQ35847979-36F4A03F-1040-4BA0-B509-BEBAB853CBEDQ36187527-2F23F405-406A-4EDB-9549-B518E9B5BCCFQ38219597-8F47B140-B269-46DE-9DD1-DBB4DF1F05FFQ41633656-3F7ACD01-3AAB-4C6D-A71A-BA62F4C2A109Q43170385-1974C8AD-FB79-4D46-B41B-2EA3E0B24CBCQ44581218-A7DC23D4-985E-4865-8359-F9BB6B9F5091Q46892169-BDAF0EB9-4001-4D57-9417-0780B1D893C4Q47095198-4BF53972-26C4-4C60-8D68-8F2A54D067D3Q51453795-62C1CA53-CEE6-4430-B0AA-455C8D2558D1Q56837873-CB3E44BF-0291-45AE-A7BC-C9557C050088Q57009034-62A6503A-E4D1-4C93-AA08-B698D1D1B73CQ57016379-883EE1A9-C656-48E4-B221-919A1E9A5999Q57199121-AD4B2012-EF68-48FF-85AB-1586BB0EE3AEQ57236310-57EF268C-DAEA-4A79-8AA3-DB3C43A194A1Q57248222-56ECF7FE-3E27-4E16-8BEE-7A2548978242Q57248975-68544404-920C-46B6-B735-32C1752775A8Q58178327-F38EB181-D93A-4004-8D15-C1EF905BAA98
P2860
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@ast
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@en
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group.
@nl
type
label
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@ast
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@en
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group.
@nl
prefLabel
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@ast
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@en
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group
@en
P2093
Emma C Underwood
Russell A Mittermeier
Will R Turner
P2860
P304
P356
10.1073/PNAS.0710705105
P407
P577
2008-04-14T00:00:00Z