Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
about
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysisDigital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methodsConsequences of digital mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: initial changes and long-term impact on referral ratesBudget impact analysis of switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: a discrete event simulation model.Overview of the radiographers' practice in 65 healthcare centers using digital mammography systems in Portugal.Improved blood tests for cancer screening: general or specific?Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammographyDoes digital mammography suppose an advance in early diagnosis? Trends in performance indicators 6 years after digitalizationIs quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?Increase in perceived case suspiciousness due to local contrast optimisation in digital screening mammography.Breast Cancer Characteristics Associated With Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers.Comparison of the diagnostic workup of women referred at non-blinded or blinded double reading in a population-based screening mammography programme in the south of the Netherlands.Effects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.Comparison of the clinical performance of three digital mammography systems in a breast cancer screening programme.Comparison of new and established full-field digital mammography systems in diagnostic performance.Impact of the Introduction of Digital Mammography in an Organized Screening Program on the Recall and Detection RateDose reduction in automatic optimization parameter of full field digital mammography: breast phantom study.Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers.Computer-aided diagnosis in breast magnetic resonance imaging.Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.The impact of digital mammography on screening a young cohort of women for breast cancer in an urban specialist breast unit.Interval cancer rates in the Irish national breast screening programme.Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers.Breast and cervical cancer screening programme implementation in 16 countries.Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.Women's features and inter-/intra-rater agreement on mammographic density assessment in full-field digital mammograms (DDM-SPAIN).Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study.High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography.Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.Digital versus screen-film mammography: impact of mammographic density and hormone therapy on breast cancer detection.The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.A decade of progress in cancer researchImpact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.Evolution of the National Breast Screening Programme in Ireland: Two-year interval analysis (2004-2013) of BreastCheck.Digital mammography in breast cancer screening: a step forward?Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.
P2860
Q26851245-0FC2E7BC-F17A-49A4-9217-50B196082A67Q28364666-8E8328F2-54D8-4C22-B81A-D05F12FDAF4AQ28749996-BA2DAB35-32E4-41B2-870E-7577EB56C1EEQ33617993-CC5303A9-EFCA-4611-9BDF-C991CD7F7C67Q33708331-3A67DAEC-D30B-4873-8809-BCDAA2B3E061Q34086617-16228FA2-0747-44A9-91A0-1348201D6063Q34681082-30741917-D234-469A-91BE-837DC74E561AQ35083632-AA477234-C9E3-40F7-92DA-B3E6565A15B0Q35182421-A40C8129-17BB-4F30-A682-9B54A7EA6997Q35815681-91323824-9C85-4205-8EDC-7D509A883022Q35990552-6D0C207C-7A21-4CA3-93CA-1EDE844A3495Q36295003-F97A1D95-9914-434B-A57D-390D7268A1E9Q36388896-8FFC40DD-B882-486F-AFA4-0938485C8F49Q36653296-970DDF42-F87E-42E2-9FCC-93CE73F3C85AQ36662523-D4DB4BD4-6D9E-4F32-BC77-6626AEE1823DQ36678269-C69C6EEB-A234-45A3-926A-8E192D5699F5Q36764021-821FC21C-0920-4E92-AA56-8286061BE8A1Q37054183-8139E843-4D51-4BA4-B179-A31324A1FCA4Q37583102-460F4B4F-DC58-482A-89EF-373B1751D12BQ37855726-F7831C8A-4437-40F1-8867-077B231BB9DEQ37967148-6FE7568D-91FF-4C67-9FCA-7E75734D686BQ38442732-29551B30-F04A-4B47-818A-1FC60E973721Q39013634-BBD3E1E3-C02B-4773-A2F6-7A75DDBD977EQ39524949-B5A03334-F269-4B4C-B19B-B28044F2B677Q39955276-80A76CD8-0100-43B3-B10B-B525BFC34FDFQ39982645-3B87A7CF-B87A-43F1-9A18-11440109B1EEQ40005115-0B350F71-3E9F-480B-84EA-D4E2C66B9B81Q40045057-1FE21DA1-F964-4C73-A326-FEEBF806E8D0Q40106173-5B074B12-2D95-40D0-AEB5-BEE8547DD26BQ40112361-6BB86130-BAED-4A09-BE36-CDCDDD0AAE14Q40213767-3153C6C4-5BBE-45CE-8780-CAEAF1EEEEA5Q40236696-958DE382-4772-41E6-8258-EA290E120A3AQ40326420-E6397C5F-A7B2-44D4-9AA0-869C4FF805CAQ40469793-74E897A9-47BE-4AE6-B390-123A86164446Q42693952-656045E0-8AB3-4C3C-A2A7-805387FADB46Q45894309-570F96F0-AD27-449A-919D-5C6B243788DCQ47447942-6663E068-906E-46EB-89C3-2BD80C61C0D7Q48518423-D49C8F1F-FF34-4C09-9CC5-3B65E4E325E3Q55260831-7889A030-E7D4-44F5-B512-AB448DF02DD3
P2860
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@ast
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@en
type
label
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@ast
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@en
prefLabel
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@ast
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@en
P50
P1433
P1476
Full-field digital versus scre ...... atic review of published data.
@en
P2093
Nick Perry
Susan Shiel
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2512081235
P407
P577
2009-05-01T00:00:00Z