Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy.
about
On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.Meta-assessment of bias in scienceTitle and Abstract Screening and Evaluation in Systematic Reviews (TASER): a pilot randomised controlled trial of title and abstract screening by medical students.Data extraction from machine-translated versus original language randomized trial reports: a comparative study.A case study of binary outcome data extraction across three systematic reviews of hip arthroplasty: errors and differences of selectionEvaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.What are patients' priorities when facing the end of life? A critical review.Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of quality assessments by novice student raters using the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa ScalesFrequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review.Response to 'Increasing value and reducing waste in data extraction for systematic reviews: tracking data in data extraction forms'.Systematic Review Methodology for the Fatigue in Emergency Medical Services Project.Basics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the nephrologist.Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool
P2860
Q24658642-72DB9E85-72C1-4694-B371-56AC64290C0DQ29032830-BEB2A583-A67A-4004-B778-D4F1116BB7C2Q30596811-D48772F6-7D90-4C79-9AB7-9D13CD41F91FQ30690257-979A4546-02AC-4598-9ADD-972562EEEDF0Q30717163-5011CAEB-3BAD-424C-90C5-3D9B1CCD957FQ30829526-6E6B507A-246E-469F-83FB-EDF50BDB97ACQ37897469-9B8ACA5D-8589-42DC-91A0-3C36794194D1Q38031458-1EF0573D-02C1-41AE-87B4-3C953810A322Q47105003-54314715-CC72-46EB-AA10-6E0E08C8A1E3Q48168831-5C1606B4-3175-43A9-B094-BD668DD25F38Q50089502-B10C1815-2596-492A-B794-F494CFA2AF8AQ53085491-79D24F77-10D3-406B-8FA5-E069A2380D1AQ55252986-4E0396AE-EA9C-4184-ACDC-8744FEC8F7A8Q57542870-E8096E47-6455-49FA-B18B-B17318D19DEA
P2860
Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@ast
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@en
type
label
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@ast
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@en
altLabel
Systematic review data extract ...... ence did not increase accuracy
@en
prefLabel
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@ast
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@en
P2093
P1476
Systematic review data extract ...... nce did not increase accuracy.
@en
P2093
Ben Vandermeer
Jennifer Horton
Lisa Hartling
Nina Buscemi
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2009.04.007
P577
2009-08-14T00:00:00Z