Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
about
Comparative evaluation of digital mammography and film mammography: systematic review and meta-analysisOptimal sampling ratios in comparative diagnostic trials.Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammographyWhy does it take longer to read digital than film-screen screening mammograms? A partial explanation.Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammographyPower calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.Plasma biomarker profiles differ depending on breast cancer subtype but RANTES is consistently increased.Evaluation of radiographers' mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia.Photonic crystal enhanced fluorescence for early breast cancer biomarker detection.Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.The Reproducibility of Changes in Diagnostic Figures of Merit Across Laboratory and Clinical Imaging Reader Studies.An AUC-like index for agreement assessment.Assessing the Accuracy of Caries Diagnosis in Bitewing Radiographs Using Different Reproduction Media
P2860
Q26851245-C5505768-9E42-4E63-9E74-76C7086A6D0EQ33766683-007E54E1-5092-4A5E-909C-ECEE0512382EQ33941243-671CCBF2-41C2-4FD5-A8F7-FE93D993F5B0Q34598414-AEDB2028-ADF7-4037-8D83-261A9337A8D2Q34857538-17341ADC-78E5-4E33-BB94-1B6CBDB83C1DQ35009451-A301141E-B45A-4654-B978-AD284FD0EDFAQ35062110-D2DBA6A9-2E48-4718-A535-51C969BE01B5Q35093772-D1B21CDE-E2A6-4B37-85FC-2402BF3A1D73Q35192023-C2374FAB-0560-42F6-91CC-BF7DEDA22B81Q37350996-35B938F6-1264-44C7-9753-DAC6BD412805Q37634225-C898F4D3-AD24-40C1-8133-5BC07E06F67CQ40482756-04E2A336-CB18-4320-872B-5FC0EB90AB30Q43557411-DF23E296-E0C4-4EA1-A952-D4FF953343A6Q58778055-651F9E5A-07BA-4493-B261-CB69CFDE4495
P2860
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2008 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
name
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@ast
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@en
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@nl
type
label
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@ast
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@en
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@nl
prefLabel
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@ast
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@en
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... trospective multireader study.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Accuracy of soft-copy digital ...... etrospective multireader study
@en
P2093
Carl J D'Orsi
Constantine Gatsonis
Etta D Pisano
Helga Marques
Kalpana M Kanal
Michael A Cohen
Murray Rebner
R Edward Hendrick
Roberta A Jong
Suddhasatta Acharyya
P2860
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2471070418
P407
P577
2008-04-01T00:00:00Z