A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality.

A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33588928
The effect of journal impact factor, reporting conflicts, and reporting funding sources, on standardized effect sizes in back pain trials: a systematic review and meta-regressionMethodological quality and reporting of generalized linear mixed models in clinical medicine (2000-2012): a systematic reviewHow often are interventions in cluster-randomised controlled trials of complex interventions in general practices effective and reasons for potential shortcomings? Protocol and results of a feasibility project for a systematic reviewStepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial designs: a review of reporting quality and design featuresA Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Use, Analytical Approaches, Reporting Methods, and Publication Volume by Year in Low Back Pain Trials Published between 1980 and 2012: Respice, adspice, et prospiceIncreased risk of type I errors in cluster randomised trials with small or medium numbers of clusters: a review, reanalysis, and simulation study.An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.Quality and Reporting of Cluster Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Occupational Therapy Interventions: A Systematic ReviewQuality of reporting of pilot and feasibility cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.Applying quantitative bias analysis to estimate the plausible effects of selection bias in a cluster randomised controlled trial: secondary analysis of the Primary care Osteoarthritis Screening Trial (POST).How big should the pilot study for my cluster randomised trial be?Design and analysis of group-randomized trials in cancer: A review of current practices.A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway.Reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology: review of adherence to the CONSORT statement.
P2860

A systematic review of cluster randomised trials in residential facilities for older people suggests how to improve quality.

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33588928
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2013 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
name
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@ast
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@en
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@nl
type
label
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@ast
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@en
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@nl
prefLabel
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@ast
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@en
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P6179
P698
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
A systematic review of cluster ...... ggests how to improve quality.
@en
P2093
P2860
P2888
P304
P31
P356
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P6179
P698
P932