Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse
about
Can knowledge of germline markers of toxicity optimize dosing and efficacy of cancer therapy?Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safetyPhase I trials of antitumour agents: fundamental conceptsDesigns of drug-combination phase I trials in oncology: a systematic review of the literatureLapatinib Plasma and Tumor Concentrations and Effects on HER Receptor Phosphorylation in TumorIs the "3+3" dose-escalation phase I clinical trial design suitable for therapeutic cancer vaccine development? A recommendation for alternative design.Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experienceMelanoma patients in a phase I clinic: molecular aberrations, targeted therapy and outcomes.Dose-levels and first signs of efficacy in contemporary oncology phase 1 clinical trialsTarget-based therapeutic matching in early-phase clinical trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and PIK3CA mutations.Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of combined valproic acid/doxorubicin treatment in dogs with spontaneous cancer.Survival of 1,181 patients in a phase I clinic: the MD Anderson Clinical Center for targeted therapy experienceAdaptive designs for identifying optimal biological dose for molecularly targeted agents.PIK3CA mutations in patients with advanced cancers treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis inhibitors.Systems pharmacology approaches for optimization of antiangiogenic therapies: challenges and opportunities.N of 1 case reports of exceptional responders accrued from pancreatic cancer patients enrolled in first-in-man studies from 2002 through 2012.Outcomes of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated in a phase I clinic.Outcomes of research biopsies in phase I clinical trials: the MD anderson cancer center experience.PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations.American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: the critical role of phase I trials in cancer research and treatment.Exposure-response relationship of AMG 386 in combination with weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer and its implication for dose selection.Maximizing tumour exposure to anti-neuropilin-1 antibody requires saturation of non-tumour tissue antigenic sinks in miceDual EGFR inhibition in combination with anti-VEGF treatment: a phase I clinical trial in non-small cell lung cancerDosing de novo combinations of two targeted drugs: Towards a customized precision medicine approach to advanced cancers.Capillary isoelectric-focusing immunoassays to study dynamic oncoprotein phosphorylation and drug response to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancerDual HER2 inhibition in combination with anti-VEGF treatment is active in heavily pretreated HER2-positive breast cancerTreating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology.Nanomedicine: de novo design of nanodrugs.Phase 1 trial design: is 3 + 3 the best?The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.Determinants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.Challenges and Innovations in Phase I Dose-Finding Designs for Molecularly Targeted Agents and Cancer Immunotherapies.Seamless phase I-II trial design for assessing toxicity and efficacy for targeted agents.Dosing targeted and cytotoxic two-drug combinations: Lessons learned from analysis of 24,326 patients reported 2010 through 2013.TEAMS: Toxicity- and Efficacy-based Dose Insertion Design with Adaptive Model Selection for Phase I/II Dose-Escalation Trials in OncologyValidation of the Royal Marsden Hospital prognostic score in patients treated in the Phase I Clinical Trials Program at the MD Anderson Cancer Center.Dosing immunotherapy combinations: Analysis of 3,526 patients for toxicity and response patterns.Dosing Three-Drug Combinations That Include Targeted Anti-Cancer Agents: Analysis of 37,763 Patients.Evolution of early phase clinical trials in oncology.STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
P2860
Q26859144-ADE9DA13-1DC7-4AAF-9950-62A88DEE16C4Q26865076-63A54A0E-85D1-401E-9A3B-1F73675ADC2AQ26865346-C18C4FE6-EE3F-417F-9AB2-3B9118AF8B49Q26996348-A3E56CEF-44A1-4606-8FB7-C1541E0ACD2FQ27342948-43E659D8-889F-491A-A4DF-96BAD9ED5A1BQ30370848-27952D35-2216-4B3E-BCAA-03B010E9F01DQ33399986-634D25D7-2E3C-496F-86E7-E1204BB03B9FQ33845387-92C2C235-9358-421B-BE28-9F914D72FC4EQ33849805-27E8AEC7-C226-4AB4-A7B0-2AC39CE0D27EQ34153696-77D1610B-8E17-4FB8-9831-5C9DC3F1CBFAQ34168530-D99D9F1B-C1EA-46CA-AB6F-992B14A911C8Q34252383-C0DE7E9B-5268-4FE6-BC67-57F425DED638Q34550826-00D89C3C-C22E-4733-B6BB-80409CA4DA28Q34769343-5CDD4761-1A6D-461D-B9B0-C33710C9B60CQ35104052-ACD76CF9-EA5E-4683-9A9B-A74DECC1203BQ35376207-6F689997-5F2B-4855-82C5-F2787DC55ECBQ35584482-E95BD9CD-1CAC-4CB6-BF08-83842A6F045BQ35584811-36D7E710-B5A6-4E96-8335-EEA777B117C4Q35808438-37496A34-889A-492F-93FA-C8C8928E7DD6Q35894574-24D34F92-699D-4084-A7B5-7E6E9E78742DQ35914787-729B6C8F-68D7-4984-A9AC-6DA397051856Q36153295-59600D95-5BAE-4004-9BD9-24CF44730953Q36984851-D4EB11EA-3393-4A94-91D1-39F8AEA942ABQ36998239-E5991369-BF0B-4AEB-B1A3-E37D97D883CEQ37297137-77273862-9CEB-4950-A710-0BE9785E4C0DQ37344085-E05643D7-FAE5-4EB1-9E30-D248D6B6361FQ37970910-E96C907D-5D2D-49AD-AC08-05A0F225BB05Q38168683-38BB4ADA-4C3E-41A2-8EC7-A9F41DA3F818Q38222466-16E4B549-35CF-42D2-9A69-BFEC55E9C10AQ38629203-C4A9891A-98A8-42F9-9223-2AFA49267ED5Q39128248-9DB770D8-97E4-4DF3-AE83-6EFCD52E364FQ39374749-697FFE5B-C2A6-48DD-B382-638558198690Q39449883-3AC085D7-F00C-434F-B853-076801D23ED3Q41673963-79F35551-C111-49C8-A957-D98987CC4C66Q42108875-18907488-7E44-4A7F-BE08-B292FE4DF66AQ43455943-D637B8A3-F584-45CF-9D31-B74F71D9792FQ44209463-49D29841-53C6-4E0C-84F5-976FC58DB6CBQ45994683-E3FCDE88-DCC2-4E77-A0D0-4E7F7867F4DFQ47816379-046FB871-494A-451E-AD35-1E802602F6BBQ48275752-C96DF3FD-4429-4578-B6B7-7F2E63FC0A7F
P2860
Phase I oncology studies: evidence that in the era of targeted therapies patients on lower doses do not fare worse
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@ast
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@en
type
label
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@ast
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@en
prefLabel
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@ast
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Phase I oncology studies: evid ...... lower doses do not fare worse
@en
P2093
David Hong
J Jack Lee
Jennifer Wheler
Maurie Markman
Rajul K Jain
P2860
P304
P356
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2684
P407
P577
2010-02-09T00:00:00Z