Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
about
The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseasesSelf-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-AnalysisWhat is the impact of change in diagnostic test method on surveillance data trends in Chlamydia trachomatis infection?Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by ligase chain reaction versus ACCESS Chlamydia antigen assayDetermination of Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in an asymptomatic screening population: performances of the LCx and COBAS Amplicor tests with urine specimens.Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.Reproducibility problems with the Abbott laboratories LCx assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Multicenter evaluation of AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Diagnostic performance of the Roche AMPLICOR PCR in detecting Neisseria gonorrhoeae in genitourinary specimens from female sex workers in Cotonou, Benin.Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.Evaluation of a modified sanitary napkin as a sample self-collection device for the detection of genital chlamydial infection in womenEffect of endocervical specimen adequacy on ligase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.PreservCyt transport medium used for the ThinPrep Pap test is a suitable medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the COBAS Amplicor CT/NG test: results of a preliminary study and future implicationsConfirmation by 16S rRNA PCR of the COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG test for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in a low-prevalence population.Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes and the Swedish new variant among urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis strains in FinlandHow reliable are tests for trachoma?--a latent class approach.Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population.Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosticsValidation of roche COBAS Amplicor assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in rectal and pharyngeal specimens by an omp1 PCR assay.Classical and Molecular Methods for Evaluation of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection in Women with Tubal Factor Infertility.
P2860
Q24555005-BBF246E0-89FD-4C3D-9F84-E5587AC96844Q27025596-B63F65F5-CC52-47DF-AAD5-EF838F76CC9EQ31031891-347A7852-9311-4E3F-976B-43F17B582844Q33962682-A1B5EAEE-112B-404E-8627-18D64A1E169FQ33962817-4DAC5CBE-0F6E-4D90-8D1F-22506F7CFA01Q33966004-07F9935E-061A-4D13-A921-47EB440F336AQ33967657-2AB697AE-28BB-4CB3-B0BF-B886257AEEE6Q33969841-82623990-2178-43EF-B88E-58D77C92F173Q33970240-6061CD49-6AE5-4632-A26E-8B70967C13EFQ33972194-3F07D6DB-B897-4C43-ADCF-11103F2A01BAQ33972866-91F8E4A7-A8C7-4633-95A2-B68AC8542576Q33973847-260F4EDD-A959-44C5-A8EE-B2C19ED6F7AFQ34193680-AFD4BCA1-503C-4068-B092-1C68DB1D5C6DQ34438902-2468BD1A-F560-401C-8F24-2F4E2B818FBFQ35070678-859528B9-CCA2-4C49-90CD-65CA525BB110Q35221151-08C582DB-A4DF-4F31-A12B-D086442627D5Q35528964-1A3D55C7-F3B9-45AC-B141-FFEE8B0AEF59Q35530159-DC0F04B3-1107-4872-9AB6-8201646727EEQ35553355-1AC3FB68-F228-43B0-B234-18F25388BECBQ37035405-C0D65DE0-DF03-49A9-8803-939E6F042B99
P2860
Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1998 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年論文
@yue
1998年論文
@zh-hant
1998年論文
@zh-hk
1998年論文
@zh-mo
1998年論文
@zh-tw
1998年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@ast
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@en
type
label
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@ast
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@ast
Comparison of performances of ...... lamydia trachomatis infection.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparison of performances of ...... hlamydia trachomatis infection
@en
P2093
E Hiltunen-Back
J Paavonen
M Lehtinen
M Puolakkainen
P Lähteenmäki
P2860
P304
P407
P577
1998-06-01T00:00:00Z