Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.
about
Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC3) in colorectal cancerThe quality of communication about older patients between hospital physicians and general practitioners: a panel study assessmentClinical guidelines: developing guidelines.Developing criteria for cesarean section using the RAND appropriateness methodDevelopment of guidelines for skeletal survey in young children with fractures.Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic reviewPrediction of persistent shoulder pain in general practice: comparing clinical consensus from a Delphi procedure with a statistical scoring system.Developing clinical guidelinesLessons learned in the development of process quality indicators for cancer care in Japan.Quality indicators for continuous monitoring to improve maternal and infant health in maternity departments: a modified Delphi survey of an international multidisciplinary panel.Development of hospital-based guidelines for skeletal survey in young children with bruisesValidation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practiceA confidential enquiry into cases of neonatal encephalopathy.How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery, using a 3-step modified Delphi approach.Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.Implications and limitations of appropriateness studies for chiropractic.Development, validation and testing of an epidemiological case definition of interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome.Developing Criteria for Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Using RAND Appropriateness Method (RAM).Development of Cardiovascular Quality Indicators for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from an International Expert Panel Using a Novel Online Process.A qualitative analysis of a consensus process to develop quality indicators of injury care.A new method for evaluating compliance with industry self-regulation codes governing the content of alcohol advertisingQuality of care measures for the management of unhealthy alcohol use.Reconciling patient and provider priorities for improving the care of critically ill patients: A consensus method and qualitative analysis of decision making.Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to evaluate clinical practice guidelines.Application of the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Methodology to a Large Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Group Evaluating the Validity and Feasibility of Patient-Centered Standards in Geriatric Surgery.Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care
P2860
Q28676969-C8DD769A-2EB7-44CA-AF21-7FD8220F0161Q33295082-67EB96DB-820C-4C47-BD58-B9E6773AFC42Q33536430-B93D9FF3-154C-4231-8C35-4CCFD27A042AQ33692472-6E94B7C5-7FAC-45B2-832C-D53557725747Q33794867-1C572651-CF1C-4202-9862-B426106513AAQ33939062-25CBC523-699B-4C03-B3CB-C3AB400B00FFQ33947107-BF74D2D6-B942-4237-AF13-91144059F4EBQ34190895-E19C2BA1-ABCF-4A9A-9DCD-9240C6467431Q34344640-7C8D80D4-5FFE-4E10-992D-B762E58A7611Q34663909-5B996CAF-7C33-47BC-A150-922AD4776D83Q35014742-BE40B2B9-F19F-40A3-B897-AE63C0524035Q35256875-3BD2D2E2-A243-4B81-B6FA-899E4463E752Q35292578-34FD8E03-05C1-405B-8CB3-E26ECAC88CDBQ35527124-5A26A1BC-8884-43E6-A50F-D04FA6C4C4BCQ35537640-F03A1AAB-82B6-441D-8AEF-4BB2E1EDA3BCQ35561839-F0F507F8-DCBC-46A2-9530-00D15A8C384EQ35930037-6C6EA3A4-6C62-4B03-B38C-77615150B10CQ36458897-AB800E7E-50BD-4834-8C14-1B11BD26FC1BQ36467015-7B29A9DD-7FE6-4B40-8F93-595042DE17C1Q36593810-26FDDB3F-8F3A-46F6-AE46-93EF243B5F76Q36803638-435623C6-3D7A-4344-A540-905E08DBD1AEQ37117113-7C9778B5-0A44-4AE1-80D9-68D1182FB283Q38740077-1E4D670C-A4CA-4E4D-914E-08C73D1208BAQ39340591-42EEB236-D7C2-4CDF-BC83-4FC34F70D4D9Q41829632-CE62C3AD-2BA7-4D43-9E3C-2C0B61814AFEQ52641113-0364E05A-005A-443B-B687-7B6844A931CCQ57754140-9B4C8ED8-586A-4B44-AB14-7A6E3DD5E18F
P2860
Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1995 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年論文
@yue
1995年論文
@zh-hant
1995年論文
@zh-hk
1995年論文
@zh-mo
1995年論文
@zh-tw
1995年论文
@wuu
name
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@ast
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@en
type
label
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@ast
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@en
prefLabel
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@ast
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Impact of varying panel member ...... and single disciplinary panel
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P577
1995-10-01T00:00:00Z