Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33740951

about

A ten-year study of midwife-led care at an Austrian tertiary care center: a retrospective analysis with special consideration of perineal trauma.Feasibility of a Smartphone website to support antenatal Perineal massage in pregnant women.Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.Interobserver agreement in perineal ultrasound measurement of the anovaginal distance: a methodological study.[Treatment of perineal wounds during the post partum period: evaluation of whether or not antibiotic should be systematically prescribed].Associations with perineal trauma during childbirth at home and in health facilities in indigenous municipalities in southern Mexico: a cross-sectional cluster survey.How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.

P2860

Q42379242-949D052C-11B6-4AB4-AE24-827D67E94C53 Q42690352-07C52197-739A-47BD-828D-A7E703764C60 Q47546306-67A86124-3F3A-4FF4-9A45-168F9416FEC5 Q50434578-F6C2358A-9307-4810-932A-ABDD3AC2169B Q54102458-E34291A9-0708-4E64-A1B5-45C72685DF3F Q54940692-C56EECFC-E34A-4ACC-9C8F-D7CEFC38159B Q55491662-AA63AF08-BC3D-4938-801D-554E1CD6D72F

P2860

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33740951

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2017 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

name

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@ast

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@en

type

label

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@ast

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@en

prefLabel

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@ast

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@en

P1433

Q33740951-D30A76BD-3EEE-4A10-BE71-A019BF1E711A

P1476

Q33740951-7B61272E-E7EA-4056-A8D4-C8304E25C799

P2093

Q33740951-9B613FA3-3946-426E-91C4-895D81CF9516

Q33740951-E72F5740-65F3-439C-963B-B6780C9B7AE2

Q33740951-F05CE0C1-536F-4A94-B0E0-D17D3F694F25

P275

Q33740951-D3A38541-AD6E-4A2E-982E-13153347E28D

P2860

Q33740951-01BE6C46-CC4F-44B2-BEC8-C71BD2AC7941

Q33740951-0834DEB5-3213-4FBF-A49C-F5CE5DF9EF5C

Q33740951-0F408B12-18D0-4B6E-9031-87FB24629067

Q33740951-0F70F02B-9CDA-4281-AB5F-C4D47A76A3EB

Q33740951-23BFE0ED-C84D-4E79-9BEB-2C8F09724275

Q33740951-2C508197-8DB9-4F68-BD99-7883E2D57BD0

Q33740951-31813CB8-9B1A-4C4F-A762-E1834B5BE2F7

Q33740951-4385E6EF-D407-46EF-87BF-2443DD7B7376

Q33740951-43DD2CD2-2DDB-43F0-99FA-B7A821293D9B

Q33740951-4A28A172-6471-4C77-AEF0-A733331EC05E

P304

Q33740951-359DD606-EE82-415C-8949-3E8D87460994

P31

Q33740951-6A1AB271-2227-40EE-8FEE-A9B82D968F3A

Q33740951-CDB4489F-417E-4314-9B92-182B87A8C01F

Q33740951-a4d4a632-1232-467b-b9dd-6089901ce050

P356

Q33740951-D32FF99F-FF04-4937-9850-6E4DDA218156

P478

Q33740951-A5095E84-087F-4F83-AE01-4D764C38B8DF

P50

Q33740951-F5C83CAC-E7C6-4092-B3BA-0C867A5FA19D

P577

Q33740951-D527EDBB-BAE5-466B-83CE-6A8073B559AF

P698

Q33740951-5B5A8B4A-543A-4FFA-9E0B-AAD5CE30ADD3

P921

Q33740951-70757570-FD03-400D-A3A7-25EAC2838600

P932

Q33740951-3AE3E489-07EF-48AF-B19C-6BD3DF43821A

P356

14651858.CD000081.PUB3

P1433

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

P1476

Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

@en

P2093

Guillermo Carroli

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hong Jiang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Xu Qian

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial

P2860

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

When trial authors write Cochrane Reviews: competing interests need to be better managed

Episiotomy for vaginal birth

Methods of repair for obstetric anal sphincter injury

Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitals in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views

Classification of episiotomy: towards a standardisation of terminology

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Risk of recurrence, subsequent mode of birth and morbidity for women who experienced severe perineal trauma in a first birth in New South Wales between 2000-2008: a population based data linkage study.

P304

CD000081

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1002/14651858.CD000081.PUB3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2017-02-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28176333

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

anatomical region

P932

5449575

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string