Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
about
Invariant visual object recognition and shape processing in ratsReliabilities of mental rotation tasks: limits to the assessment of individual differencesSize-sensitive perceptual representations underlie visual and haptic object recognition.Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects.fMRI activity patterns in human LOC carry information about object exemplars within category.Fundamental failures of shape constancy resulting from cortical anisotropyObject similarity affects the perceptual strategy underlying invariant visual object recognition in rats.Object representations in ventral and dorsal visual streams: fMRI repetition effects depend on attention and part-whole configuration.Mental visualization of objects from cross-sectional images.How does the brain solve visual object recognition?The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations.Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.Effects of plane rotation, task, and complexity on recognition of familiar and chimeric objects.The effects of mirror reflections and planar rotations of pictures on the shape percept of the depicted object.Effects of light, rotation, and texture on errors in the estimated length of a three-dimensional object in a two-dimensional display.Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts.Where you look can influence haptic object recognition.Haptic object recognition: how important are depth cues and plane orientation?Effect of active exploration of 3-D object views on the view-matching process in object recognition.Shape beyond recognition: form-derived directionality and its effects on visual attention and motion perception.Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects?Viewpoint dependence in the recognition of non-elongated familiar objects: testing the effects of symmetry, front-back axis, and familiarity.Similarity, typicality, and category-level matching of morphed outlines of everyday objects.Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: mental rotation versus invariant features.Recognizing a plane-misoriented view of a familiar object is not influenced by the ease of specifying the main axis of elongation of that object.Gaze cues evoke both spatial and object-centered shifts of attention.Interactions between view changes and shape changes in picture-picture matching.Perceptual completion and object-based representations in short-term visual memory.
P2860
Q27013053-2584D6DF-6FFC-472D-A545-D7322F395211Q28662219-7D0A5F2C-229C-4D58-8102-ECC330F00370Q30945091-447DC3CB-7916-40F9-91C4-6544838E3E80Q33377375-36B0F292-6069-45E2-A139-05D1FF156606Q33703540-CFE57CB4-69DD-490C-B5A6-97191CE35070Q33744351-1A9EB1A5-5CD4-4363-B0B4-1E7EECC93FD5Q35170359-DC738D8B-6CB7-4408-AA6B-4F68F8FA5D6BQ35223647-26B70754-8A73-4138-AE00-F3F8F8765665Q35754228-89A03EB9-4593-47BC-A580-AB91F40FE7BDQ35836346-DC31D0BB-22CC-4FEB-8124-1681C1B72E00Q37473179-3DF7AD47-0013-453F-B60C-D8C5E38584E5Q38416925-1E098AA8-BC08-40EE-974C-50E741A8894CQ38432969-A48B71A1-67CC-4658-BE2B-26A5DDD41A97Q38447670-5FE3BA8C-59F9-4F25-94AE-1741BE7035EFQ44789694-F2292E20-7FE4-4278-8C06-69D6D50EDA6CQ47703119-6CDFF460-F257-4467-832E-FC08E81BF320Q50711019-1D66CB02-A0C3-4ECA-A96B-2BE6F785A931Q50994381-D50406F0-518D-4BF9-973A-E9695D062217Q51053828-487E1C70-FBCF-4554-9867-82EE915DB179Q51460064-0C5BC2C1-1626-4614-A53D-6B51F1D834F0Q51889059-147091C1-1BF8-45C0-A5FD-CABAD65F718FQ51932726-E0DC0A93-2CBC-4174-8C81-B57B362A8BBBQ51940341-995CDF66-9743-495A-9D6C-462615631C24Q51962214-A5FFEB36-581D-4638-835E-8A34A39D0514Q52000730-9EF47768-701B-4858-9CBF-911CF58A193DQ52014996-B4C5566A-08FC-4E78-84EF-AD15C0315F34Q52092860-935020F5-8F44-45B8-8A51-47CE47C447A2Q52100689-44EB1E74-9A55-4561-8D97-66F7B9C477E7
P2860
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@ast
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@en
type
label
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@ast
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@en
prefLabel
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@ast
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@en
P1433
P1476
Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00052-3
P577
1999-09-01T00:00:00Z