Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
about
The importance of values in evidence-based medicineEffects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after studySocial media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health careThe clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systemsHas evidence-based medicine ever been modern? A Latour-inspired understanding of a changing EBM.Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history'You can't just hit a button': an ethnographic study of strategies to repurpose data from advanced clinical information systems for clinical process improvement.Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: explaining the complexity of implementation.Constructive eHealth evaluation: lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals.People-centred science: strengthening the practice of health policy and systems researchValidity and Reliability of the eHealth Analysis and Steering Instrument.Practice-centred evaluation and the privileging of care in health information technology evaluation.Studying technology use as social practice: the untapped potential of ethnographyBuilding a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems.An empirically-derived approach for investigating Health Information Technology: the Elementally Entangled Organisational Communication (EEOC) frameworkSupporting teachers and children in schools: the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Incredible Years teacher classroom management programme in primary school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial, with parallel economic and procesOnline communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use.Impact of a mHealth intervention for peer health workers on AIDS care in rural Uganda: a mixed methods evaluation of a cluster-randomized trialEvaluation of the effects of implementing an electronic early warning score system: protocol for a stepped wedge study.Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluationUsage analysis of a shared care planning systemVirtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study.SCALS: a fourth-generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy contextEffect of the Implementation of Barcode Technology and an Electronic Medication Administration Record on Adverse Drug Events.The role of qualitative research in adding value to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from a pilot study of a guided e-learning intervention for managers to improve employee wellbeing and reduce sickness absenceBeyond the Randomized Controlled Trial: A Review of Alternatives in mHealth Clinical Trial Methods.Understanding the implementation and adoption of an information technology intervention to support medicine optimisation in primary care: qualitative study using strong structuration theory.Evaluating Health Information Systems Using Ontologies.Beyond pilotitis: taking digital health interventions to the national level in China and Uganda.A systematic review of the research evidence for the benefits of teledentistry.Meaningful use in the safety net: a rapid ethnography of patient portal implementation at five community health centers in California.Evaluation Methods for Assessing Users' Psychological Experiences of Web-Based Psychosocial Interventions: A Systematic ReviewThe need for balanced health policies to avoid path dependent medicine.Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies.The Bright Elusive Butterfly of Value in Health Technology Development: Comment on "Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies".Expert knowledge elicitation using computer simulation: the organization of frail elderly case management as an illustration.Integrating Human Factors Engineering and Information Processing Approaches to Facilitate Evaluations in Criminal Justice Technology Research.Information Architecture of Web-Based Interventions to Improve Health Outcomes: Systematic Review.A Strategic Study about Quality Characteristics in e-Health Systems Based on a Systematic Literature Review.Keys to success of a community of clinical practice in primary care: a qualitative evaluation of the ECOPIH project.
P2860
Q21146697-5575C73C-DA07-4D01-9FA3-2C5EEE97B058Q28480437-5439DBBD-D47F-43B8-A166-7168F5422323Q28658531-FCBB0895-C3B2-40C6-91D5-951920EBE9DBQ28658588-70D69F04-A2B8-419E-854F-11F7E53C0E69Q30402008-3EE5E59B-7523-4EE8-A748-B0102B4D74F6Q30410923-E5A6C72C-D67A-4627-A759-BD2FA7F6882FQ30539177-B9F71ECB-FD19-440A-B7DA-6A71EF8F8FEBQ30607871-FEA8FF3E-6D73-4580-9DB5-4DA49A81CD3FQ33582616-A74E4783-456E-4FD3-8390-952038F2B967Q33602125-719D2599-2F12-485E-A42E-AD395D106B78Q33856745-39F02CAF-6A23-4C3E-A067-2617E1FEDCE1Q33861453-7E38A034-09B1-4FFF-821E-0783FFF30111Q33882355-91752177-60E6-4B7D-9F29-2F0F88240997Q34251478-96D8FC41-DC2D-4AEA-AC21-BA0A1D266887Q34334322-ECEDA54F-13C1-44DF-8C4A-E5798137A5B1Q34398384-FC8F1DD1-AB25-4586-A20B-A74A24C9CD27Q34487952-3180C78C-077F-490B-B53D-95B8CADB3EC7Q35693677-4F19C1CC-BE3D-4B50-B428-506159777804Q35918602-B9E03005-8216-4001-88B8-A045FD660F45Q36306786-2C7820AC-AA6F-41B3-849D-5E22F06CDB11Q36519102-C94DDCDF-E66E-40A2-B13C-5F64E0C43F4AQ36527197-63050C3B-A8CB-4DB7-9CB2-155F0C1222FEQ36603091-79B9FBCE-8B07-40E5-96E0-38AD06974A1DQ37016068-F14F275A-5D54-40A0-9287-8393D408B3C7Q37160679-12C20C83-2026-4C75-A69E-3DA1B1780BB5Q37280514-24F8D731-EF22-4BE8-A617-8D1FAC134E58Q38370844-68AAC9D0-B276-48C8-BE17-65B47FA6B739Q38391184-BBE875FC-ECF1-4905-B2D3-DF99A73A7F28Q38649730-D0A350F2-A519-43D8-AD3A-22DB53361BB8Q38766303-0B5DAB6B-7563-4337-88E2-F94717B28D89Q38878447-63A72672-7E67-4AF9-90A6-9BD1187F2852Q38882116-45CB5BFF-B0E6-4175-8E8A-E64CC9EA133BQ41846702-0F7AAE7D-200F-420F-BBC3-6900BD739BA2Q45951592-B0692059-B10E-4342-8659-E6E8AAE2DC08Q47103772-61306B95-6EE8-4C0D-A126-963DC5BD3978Q50705409-3C01EB4D-E83D-4FB1-8344-158B32AACECEQ50922764-DD02BB59-BEE9-4394-A42B-ED48A3334A15Q52644190-1ACADF1A-1574-443E-885A-415CD9421A20Q53190135-E64A3EE5-279C-4618-9608-DB0A911E1B42Q53819710-5E8C0E5C-BD1E-40EF-BA18-71253283742E
P2860
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Նոյեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի նոյեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@ast
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@en
type
label
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@ast
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@en
prefLabel
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@ast
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.
@en
P2093
Jill Russell
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1000360
P407
P577
2010-11-02T00:00:00Z