Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.
about
Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study.Preprocessing structured clinical data for predictive modeling and decision support. A roadmap to tackle the challenges.Telerehabilitation store and forward applications: a review of applications and privacy considerations in physical and occupational therapy practiceMeasuring up: Implementing a dental quality measure in the electronic health record context.Examining perceptions of the usefulness and usability of a mobile-based system for pharmacogenomics clinical decision support: a mixed methods study.Effectiveness of Implementation of Electronic Malaria Information System as the National Malaria Surveillance System in Thailand.Mobile PHRs compliance with Android and iOS usability guidelines.Human Factors and Ergonomics in the Design of Health Information Technology: Trends and Progress in 2014.User-centered design of multi-gene sequencing panel reports for clinicians.Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.Human-centered design of a personal health record system for metabolic syndrome management based on the ISO 9241-210:2010 standard.Task-specific usability requirements of electronic medical records systems: Lessons learned from a national survey of end-users.Usability, learnability and performance evaluation of Intelligent Research and Intervention Software: A delivery platform for eHealth interventions.Proposing Electronic Health Record Usability Requirements Based on Enriched ISO 9241 Metric Usability Model.
P2860
Q31113899-ACBCC19C-B3F7-488C-A48F-A25C10CEE87CQ31147284-8EE047D7-8E10-4D3B-B4E8-B10A244276D0Q35157545-E49161BC-D77B-444E-B9D3-2199C5ED014FQ36446620-B7FFF0CB-23AF-4A40-8F3C-FB5184D0736FQ36623055-A0369126-5649-4EBE-8884-466192EBA190Q36907113-D6C6BD3E-6C82-45D4-900E-EE3C8BB4981EQ38222597-37867E97-88BE-48AE-A54E-0506E661431FQ38972280-CC3AF192-35D0-4C73-B092-9BE89D81A68FQ41646229-2AC99160-C46C-44AB-9664-3D3A2D26CD88Q47249399-4ADCC8D6-5A46-4489-ABD2-DDCAF0656489Q49540295-4D75D8F7-5140-4F8B-B7F4-38D8A28A3C7AQ50444940-B88B47FC-B1D2-4E25-A524-694BB524E3BBQ50581154-2188714D-FABA-428D-A00A-245974AEA23AQ55118353-9B7516EA-621A-4117-932C-05C870717BBF
P2860
Are three methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@ast
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@en
type
label
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@ast
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@en
prefLabel
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@ast
Are three methods better than ...... evaluation methods in an EHR.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Are three methods better than ...... y evaluation methods in an EHR
@en
P2093
Duong Tran
Elsbeth Kalenderian
Joel M White
Krishna K Kookal
Mark Piotrowski
Muhammad F Walji
Nicole S Kimmes
Oluwabunmi Tokede
Paul C Stark
Rachel Ramoni
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2014.01.010
P577
2014-02-03T00:00:00Z