Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.
about
Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancerDealing with robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: Current status and perspectivesHigher risk of incomplete mesorectal excision and positive circumferential margin in low rectal cancer regardless of surgical technique.Role of laparoscopy in rectal cancer: a review.Laparoscopy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer reduces short-term morbidity: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Improving the outcomes in oncological colorectal surgeryLaparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical efficacySingle-incision laparoscopic versus traditional multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery--a cumulative meta-analysis and systematic review.Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies.Meta-analysis of the laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast track surgery.Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection in the multimodality management of low rectal cancers.Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study.The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgeryIncidence of port-site metastasis after undergoing robotic surgery for biliary malignancies.Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO)Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a literature review and recommendations from the Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologieRobotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Contemporary perioperative care strategies.Minimal access surgery for rectal cancer: an update.Laparoscopic versus open surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach.Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of short-term outcomes.Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence.Value of multi-disciplinary input into laparoscopic management of rectal cancer - An observational study.Minimally invasive approach to colorectal cancer: an evidence-based analysis.Importance of surgical margins in rectal cancer.Long-term oncologic outcome after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.Intra-operative double-stapled colorectal or coloanal anastomotic complications of laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: double-stapled anastomotic complication could result in persistent anastomotic leakage.The impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes for colon cancer.Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes.Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.Analysis of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) right colectomy reveals a minimal learning curve.Metastatic lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients.Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: long-term results.Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.
P2860
Q24195074-E91BF38B-E82A-4618-B6E9-4FA7516B2B01Q26774696-B246E8DB-D85F-450E-B0C3-5A25059F4304Q30487534-1482BE8C-058A-44EE-816F-BE02B5CCAF1DQ33564097-69094C87-45B9-4D46-A249-4B36CC05AA81Q33695519-356FB042-D69E-49C4-B44A-DB1AFB0DA9AFQ34207797-DFCAED18-AA36-44AE-889B-B0943DC70B7AQ34265852-09D3A63D-050A-4287-80A8-6C6C62541398Q34578065-519CBA7E-9268-4415-A961-4DC9CC953453Q35419094-B2E3E718-7516-4C08-8B57-40B228CC21C6Q35885930-46E0A64A-AB24-4288-AB0A-DCABF5B3BE5FQ36067591-69A6604C-A864-43CC-9757-2A02B68F2DA7Q36151117-513B09BE-1CA8-42D7-8BA3-CEF0D57319A5Q36347525-1D5C4766-6D75-4BCF-A16B-EEFDA150F551Q36357424-A97C8027-CE78-4F63-9EA2-5C02FEC7AA48Q36723979-4B07FAC8-A6D2-4FD9-9366-09FEF699FFF2Q37209813-4CC6B521-A335-48FA-86B1-E85826E2027EQ37965885-A1DFCA1F-37AD-4E4D-8F30-3110DF276054Q37983663-02CCC254-2A86-4F64-AF2F-03F748BAC096Q38061038-556D68D4-32D6-47BB-9C1F-A0A2029B9003Q38160142-57C827A1-DD72-4479-8825-8ACD72F54868Q38178525-02EB4A19-7DBB-4F62-93E0-22BC3B9B863BQ38187006-C4A3FF5B-D635-4958-B0B3-EE05BBAB32F8Q38623889-AFA58005-D3A6-43FD-B2C3-A87B5C29BC5CQ38641794-5261B3C4-6072-4292-9787-96D45FBBDB2FQ38687322-2AFEC87E-5B93-4CDC-8820-EB31EC0981BBQ38775887-F56BB44D-547C-4C24-A162-3ED192C99A68Q38812176-04E0F8CF-8FB1-40D4-9552-9F3799374FC3Q39319330-D9D866E8-F312-4C39-BF9B-A4F08B1B4FBAQ41131518-42E2B764-18DA-4482-913F-788ECE4626C8Q41676482-053F05CD-2E68-4AE3-9717-5AD2780AB416Q41684998-281866EE-3A7C-4303-9CE9-D36F61F4442AQ41714224-26D7FCC3-4907-4F28-8F77-F162691FBD3EQ42613605-6BDD1AD2-2395-4572-A015-5D192AAC9294Q42640998-209D664B-4B9D-4DCF-909A-857F08AE371EQ42659502-DA360E44-BF76-47C5-ABC0-05F35C5BD02FQ42679682-D932C6D7-C5C5-4BBD-A3D6-ABBDDD11C7B1Q42681346-1833AA35-8245-4A7B-8234-DAFFEC2BB666Q44922791-2A38633D-2A53-4B79-98F4-51EE76BA3555Q45171059-7B261750-EB42-4A81-B3BE-D5F2FEECE582Q46000749-91D8257B-C970-49D8-8608-19DBBA604C2A
P2860
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on oncologic adequacy of resection and long-term oncologic outcomes.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@ast
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@en
type
label
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@ast
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@en
prefLabel
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@ast
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Laparoscopic-assisted versus o ...... long-term oncologic outcomes.
@en
P2093
Jian-Ping Wang
Jing-Lin Liang
Liang Kang
Mei-Jin Huang
Yan-Hong Deng
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00384-010-1091-6
P577
2010-12-21T00:00:00Z
P6179
1021717521