Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients

Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33797377

about

Towards generic online multicriteria decision support in patient-centred health care Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.Appraising the holistic value of Lenvatinib for radio-iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: A multi-country study applying pragmatic MCDA.Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada.The EVIDEM framework and its usefulness for priority setting across a broad range of health interventions Does technique matter; a pilot study exploring weighting techniques for a multi-criteria decision support framework.Exploring the perspectives and preferences for HTA across German healthcare stakeholders using a multi-criteria assessment of a pulmonary heart sensor as a case study.'Real-world' health care priority setting using explicit decision criteria: a systematic review of the literature Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).Can the EVIDEM Framework Tackle Issues Raised by Evaluating Treatments for Rare Diseases: Analysis of Issues and Policies, and Context-Specific Adaptation.Multi-criteria decision analysis for setting priorities on HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand.Field testing of a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework for coverage of a screening test for cervical cancer in South Africa.A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach Steps toward improving ethical evaluation in health technology assessment: a proposed framework The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking A pharmacogenomic approach to the treatment of children with GH deficiency or Turner syndrome GrowthHormone Research Society workshop summary: consensus guidelines for recombinant human growth hormone therapy in Prader-Willi syndrome.Introduction of new technologies and decision making processes: a framework to adapt a Local Health Technology Decision Support Program for other local settings.New technologies and surgical innovation: five years of a local health technology assessment program in a surgical department.Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review.Approaches to economic evaluations of stroke rehabilitation.Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.How to use multi-criteria decision analysis methods for reimbursement decision-making in healthcare: a step-by-step guide.Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: a systematic review.An Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Method to Rank the Critical Success Factors of Implementing a Pharmacy Barcode System.Making Good Decisions in Healthcare with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: The Use, Current Research and Future Development of MCDA.Eliciting societal preferences of reimbursement decision criteria for anti cancer drugs in South Korea.Developing a decision support system to link health technology assessment (HTA) reports to the health system policies in Iran.Which criteria are considered in healthcare decisions? Insights from an international survey of policy and clinical decision makers.Health Technology Assessment and Appraisal of Therapies for Rare Diseases.Development of a Framework Based on Reflective MCDA to Support Patient-Clinician Shared Decision-Making: The Case of the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NET) in the United States.Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) and efficient health care decision making with multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): applying the EVIDEM framework to medicines appraisal.PATIENT-CENTERED DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR QUANTIFYING PATIENT PREFERENCES.Determining the Value of Two Biologic Drugs for Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases: Results of a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis.HTA and MCDA solely or combined? The case of priority-setting in Colombia Can reflective multicriteria be the new paradigm for healthcare decision-making? The EVIDEM journey Stakeholder involvement in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

P2860

Q30352572-F415E4CA-9C0E-4E72-A561-D8089B4AC8AB Q30396161-58ED50AD-5CF8-4755-B2A6-DF468DDA1CFC Q33568653-4C2598AF-7072-4D6B-A6A6-8B74033ABD8B Q34086884-E3584F9C-CF1F-4DF7-B611-6586F3EC4E41 Q35339248-86D34707-6DF5-4680-A546-BEA3A3D93F99 Q35521438-4E053DD5-7907-4534-A9A8-5EB47B45EE36 Q35583822-56652E31-2A19-4415-844C-8F8B6F83A056 Q35610452-BC155E63-5960-493C-BF6F-0D2549AFDE7E Q35685387-0742DA55-EB41-4E0C-A477-727F413D3B63 Q35835153-898B3079-0F36-4F03-820F-9FBF1AA09B95 Q35847949-BB7896EC-E82B-4E69-9734-01ACA0E38BA5 Q35898829-9B82AE7A-5623-4838-B637-A30C8FF93504 Q35986702-163B01A9-36F5-4D3F-8F8D-D8F099F5E94E Q36042241-81678F11-7A6A-4492-BC06-D2FF05553DB8 Q36070736-453096FF-54D0-477A-8136-1768620F8220 Q36390478-06871861-A59B-432F-B1AE-D61E81F2FB27 Q37065683-F9257A78-8923-483E-8807-EFE37AD10734 Q37213617-51566CF2-BB3F-4DB4-9D67-97771C1334BF Q37332815-F8DE94F4-3D41-45E1-BD8C-91B60446BAF6 Q37939046-471FD0F3-6048-4416-A206-4E998D9CD4FB Q38001813-DC36D5E7-19C6-48B0-AA67-B1E9637A04BE Q38092231-634CB193-6E2C-4AEE-A521-BBE6AEF7C507 Q38117161-89239CAF-354E-4BA6-8AD0-E78B733190B2 Q38170437-8BC37486-EBCD-4143-8A53-DAABE7916B60 Q38195639-6E94AC63-CD15-43FB-BB6D-A7EE0AE04AF7 Q38710423-30ECAF44-D6A8-4103-8A72-D4C396AE7254 Q38947965-6D282075-0F50-4CDF-92EC-544B6B574E49 Q39055438-C6BEFD62-AB4F-4322-B678-B9D8EB2734D6 Q39063322-7C4EA855-FE43-4F49-B271-863B7C396A51 Q44234115-A88E4CF9-4F40-4E09-A67F-5DAA4E7D1671 Q47583991-4D869A6D-CA73-4C93-B4CC-72748F966D50 Q48360739-FF95A8F6-882D-4B0D-994C-268EF5D31551 Q48572824-C4B17F89-5D5C-4E4D-BF67-5FC0C6464969 Q49581829-8DB5F81F-C5EA-4B13-8ED4-317321B8FEFF Q55360994-9A5A5D00-763D-4796-9D62-3F52540CBD09 Q55430845-A41CD534-7BC9-4547-9FAA-F78397C05DF2 Q59130346-E1F22DE3-9E72-4239-B168-F09813C7845B Q59130348-F4BBB41E-780F-43C2-8905-52FD9C340614 Q59137023-9D18A1F7-70D7-4BA4-B5DB-EA5D4175FD10

P2860

Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33797377

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2010 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年論文

@yue

2010年論文

@zh-hant

2010年論文

@zh-hk

2010年論文

@zh-mo

2010年論文

@zh-tw

2010年论文

@wuu

name

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@ast

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@en

type

label

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@ast

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@en

prefLabel

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@ast

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@en

P1433

Q33797377-F486802F-1FD7-4213-9A19-BFC3F4126890

P1476

Q33797377-EDA932A9-9F20-4CE8-950E-5D6B45E35B91

P2093

Q33797377-75DD9B65-D0F3-42F5-B1CA-E8C1379A3537

Q33797377-83BF6418-6490-4F6D-8036-1EE407B59E0E

Q33797377-D9F4D4C2-836C-4A1C-B6EF-DB46515278B8

Q33797377-E6B39089-C837-4A68-BEE5-45D383495089

Q33797377-EB6318E8-AF01-4701-925E-A18E6B5AD2CB

Q33797377-FB467BE8-0D75-47DB-B697-18A5D5E5C8CF

P2860

Q33797377-090CD095-D3DA-41F5-880F-788620BC94C1

Q33797377-14C2D0BA-8AA9-47D3-9647-DC76DEDDA669

Q33797377-1F3A5DBC-3EF4-4C57-A654-5B7F90B6F972

Q33797377-20435DC7-B5A6-45FB-9DB8-8ED2E100A3BB

Q33797377-2E8E7770-D37D-4939-A934-C18BE81016F5

Q33797377-3250BA62-C923-4AA1-A98B-BA1AE541C364

Q33797377-398CDDE5-5DAE-4CD6-97FD-5F947CC1DBC4

Q33797377-3CF52BAD-11E8-4135-BC51-60B732D5EDE1

Q33797377-4558EBE4-A320-45C4-B7A5-979C5BE882A2

Q33797377-46670FAD-2FD3-4C22-ABF7-5C2E94BAA083

P2888

Q33797377-CAFE8741-9A93-4A16-B5C5-B21C72941AE9

P304

Q33797377-7FA407CE-F493-4AC9-872E-C747866382A1

P31

Q33797377-30655D19-24B5-47B7-B22C-04EABD9FDB8F

P356

Q33797377-1046905D-90F7-4B73-9F88-FD1A4AFADCBF

P478

Q33797377-8113A257-1294-4992-A481-A4AE6A7EFB8C

P577

Q33797377-D17BAE1F-75FC-4BA7-B605-7C5B4A714401

P5875

Q33797377-F5810214-BDFE-4325-873D-638B4F560CBB

P6179

Q33797377-9A35C648-2369-448B-84D7-E239AB996146

P698

Q33797377-084CD1C6-D188-42EE-9B97-B42D01D64782

P921

Q33797377-D2DFC7EC-7FD1-4A0B-B5AB-5435D2C5A1D8

P932

Q33797377-2AB8201A-042F-45FE-B058-C0AA64FDBD79

P356

P1433

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

P1476

Combining multicriteria decisi ...... e for Turner syndrome patients

@en

P2093

Cheri Deal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Donna Rindress

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hanane Khoury

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jean-Pierre Grégoire

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mireille M Goetghebeur

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Monika Wagner

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Recombinant growth hormone for children and adolescents with Turner syndrome

Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability

Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions

One of these things is not like the others: the idea of precedence in health technology assessment and coverage decisions

Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment.

Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking--the EVIDEM framework and potential applications.

Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting.

The ethical dilemma of growth hormone treatment of short stature: a scientific theoretical approach.

Care of girls and women with Turner syndrome: a guideline of the Turner Syndrome Study Group.

Justice, health, and healthcare.

P2888

P304

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/1478-7547-8-4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2010-04-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

43079244

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1012613712

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20377888

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

research ethics

P932

2856527

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string