Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
about
Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence.Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.Systematic review of nulliparous women's views of planned cesarean birth: the missing component in the debate about a term cephalic trial.Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.The parturient woman: can there be room for more than 'one person with full and equal rights inside a single human skin'?
P2860
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@ast
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@en
type
label
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@ast
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@en
prefLabel
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@ast
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Caesarean section controversy. The rate of caesarean sections is not the issue
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
1072-3; author reply 1074
P356
10.1136/BMJ.320.7241.1072
P407
P577
2000-04-01T00:00:00Z