Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
about
The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour InductionInduction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trialInduction of Labour: Change of Method and its Effects.Current pharmacotherapy options for labor induction.Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening.Misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction in premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of pregnancy.Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.Timing of sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol for induction of labor.Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.The effect of a Foley catheter balloon on cervical ripening.A safety review of medications used for labour induction.Improving maternal and perinatal outcomes in the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a vision of a community-focused approach.A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2.Oral misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol and Foley's catheter for induction of labor: A randomized controlled trial.Comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus vaginal isosorbide mononitrate for labor induction.Effectiveness and safety of double-balloon catheter versus intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate for termination of second trimester pregnancy in patients with liver dysfunction.
P2860
Q26771530-3D29756C-7C69-42CF-A5A8-E53B313A7F85Q34626347-CC6F05EA-64DA-4377-9E32-D218D3D45A4BQ35428047-252B048E-78E0-481C-9624-DBB9AB8D3E3EQ38042160-910CBEC0-FB2E-448E-AD23-36156945930AQ38385692-010A5BF5-6148-4298-AC6D-CFE8BA042D32Q38539260-524765D4-ABB9-43BD-9CB1-5269DDC82EA0Q38596923-03343845-A580-4439-BCC5-D237B6149817Q39376175-7A8A8EDD-B9BF-4B28-B9FD-CCB38F6F8EB9Q42688922-38FDA2F7-DA18-482E-B5C2-935A60F0A8E0Q43917691-38A7C52D-D43B-4C64-8849-51D2EDE47F8CQ46227982-26E025DF-5FC1-477F-8F5F-8601917777A8Q46322898-CF60DC19-B160-4DE3-95A5-494779F2C8B2Q46461281-841EEFB0-B880-4CFB-959A-1510D262C69FQ48198429-2C2A437F-61B1-4990-9250-EC2B55F851DEQ48248881-5234E7F7-5EE3-402B-9D8A-9453AE000B59Q48351036-EAF7DDB9-7D05-421A-A978-A61867518DFEQ50584524-CDA0D6C4-F347-44B2-8A74-6DA8AE1300C1Q53316051-0DFC57EA-0CE9-42EF-A6DA-9E0124B9FB2D
P2860
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@ast
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@en
type
label
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@ast
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@en
prefLabel
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@ast
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis.
@en
P2860
P50
P1476
Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis
@en
P2093
D H Saltzman
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1471-0528.2011.02905.X
P577
2011-02-18T00:00:00Z