Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications.
about
A new standard of care for the management of peritoneal surface malignancyImproving question formulation for use in evidence appraisal in a tertiary care setting: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN66375463]Being uninformed on informed consent: a pilot survey of medical education facultyThe views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversightAn ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethicsSystematic four-quadrant biopsy detects Barrett's dysplasia in more patients than nonsystematic biopsy.A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects.A randomized study of telephonic care support in populations at risk for musculoskeletal preference-sensitive surgeriesAdrift in the Gray Zone: IRB Perspectives on Research in the Learning Health System.Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.Redesigning cancer careWhat should be disclosed to research participants?Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvementPredicting readmission of heart failure patients using automated follow-up callsNarrative methods in quality improvement research.When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge.Diagnosis of MS: a comparison of three different clinical settings.Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care systemModifications of graduate public/community health nursing internships to facilitate compliance with Institutional Review Board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations.An enhanced approach to distinguishing public health practice and human subjects research.Assessing the primary nurse role in the wound healing process.Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research.Do chiropractic college faculty understand informed consent: a pilot study.Ethics Issues Arising in the Transition to Learning Health Care Systems: Results from Interviews with Leaders from 25 Health SystemsInnovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysisThe expanding purview: institutional review boards and the review of human subjects research.Violence and restraint reduction efforts on inpatient psychiatric units.Confronting and resolving an ethical dilemma associated with a practice based evaluation using observational methodology of health information technology.Does academic culture support translational research?The registry and follow-up of complex pediatric therapies program of Western Canada: a mechanism for service, audit, and research after life-saving therapies for young children.Uncovering the common ground in qualitative inquiry: combining quality improvement and phenomenology in clinical nursing research.Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women.Research vulnerability: an illustrative case study from the South African mining industry.Outcomes from implementing systematic antepartum depression screening in obstetrics.Engaging in Collaborative Research: Focus on the Pharmacy Practitioner.Improving safety in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective study of the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access.Quality improvement in primary care: ethical issues explored.When and Why Is Research without Consent Permissible?Research, audit and quality improvement.
P2860
Q24626790-46BB81B4-9656-439D-8E39-2FAF60D30C5AQ24795195-EB711AFF-7A4D-42FD-9197-F9436B220253Q24803674-AD3D23DB-1B43-4729-B1F7-75A1E7628DF3Q28258336-71C95EFD-7634-427A-BDA8-67F133D113D7Q28283192-06404977-EE2A-4F25-9EAD-5A53DE192C5FQ30483755-041884CD-FC99-4F75-B7CA-620A2CC68B39Q30488808-621B393F-D5FB-4DC4-9928-CEC5E68AC02FQ30536155-546554A9-9D1C-40D3-9EFC-5096807178B6Q30830289-337827F2-E437-4A25-B0C6-C0B3C09FA18AQ33430032-41E33F86-259C-46C2-8FDB-980DB7AA7E9FQ33808735-A3FD66BA-1A85-4FAC-ABD6-88AD98E479D9Q34131719-E77A41F1-0472-4F10-9017-E67355F99FB6Q34629608-E9DC87F9-CD92-486D-AE5E-080A2D1695D0Q35424436-FD2CB480-D831-4CFA-A265-65B65A582968Q35528198-2E0EBB10-471C-4100-B158-86413C957A73Q35562007-AF04A030-B841-411C-A599-170A508D4F89Q35569880-EB3BEB5D-DF7E-477C-AB75-1D8E75E5526BQ35780417-0FC1C97C-D656-4E62-B4AB-F7CA481C879DQ36110073-61337C1C-66EB-44F1-B540-C17DC0075810Q36150084-E266AD59-4ADD-4E24-96E7-619F98195E44Q36293193-43CD48E1-B130-46A1-8445-4DF5F939F1DBQ36425557-0A2BF602-203D-488B-8147-2880E5C8D7ABQ36690395-03A5EC20-F9B4-427C-AC9E-403DD51AB9C8Q36787551-0798B6A0-CC87-48CC-AA45-4AA20D849EAFQ36978794-2306B88B-491C-4213-A52F-A8D88AAE1EBAQ37225185-03030546-2285-46B3-AB9E-0461A5D0FEB3Q37269105-9B86AF0C-BAF3-401D-A197-5C34DA3FB087Q37689770-396AC0A0-93D9-4BA0-B84C-F1FBAB000CA1Q38101563-B83411D6-3B6E-44E2-B810-E812A3DCBDC2Q42348217-3D319A2A-9C2F-4B34-AC55-A13F89F260B0Q42737192-5CA71232-FCAE-46E4-9DA5-1E19E5FA8FCCQ47191835-4383FF11-AD98-4C5F-ABA3-B6AD69332F99Q47240207-29EA4155-D2B3-4A97-8078-97F83B6C09A6Q48687632-D24861A2-40C8-4521-9C49-E1138AB08C44Q48720732-9BFB17BA-40FB-4126-8284-6A619559F057Q50317567-967C4931-9431-4A56-A08D-6EED445784FBQ50682400-9422FBE9-E3A9-4D6F-A82C-C87884C6B3B3Q50752540-D852EEEA-2DAB-4093-BEA8-A3B438B01AB7Q51511583-FEEB2B7F-644F-45B5-832C-63962F1845E0Q51920144-44477ED4-CB0B-4EED-B1FC-9C80310FA8D3
P2860
Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@ast
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@en
type
label
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@ast
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@en
prefLabel
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@ast
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Determining when quality impro ...... ia and potential implications.
@en
P2093
D Casarett
J H Karlawish
J Sugarman
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.283.17.2275
P407
P577
2000-05-01T00:00:00Z