Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33929096

about

Metal backed fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties using minimal invasive surgery: a promising outcome analysis of 132 cases.The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial Letter to the Editor: The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial Minimally invasive Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in young patients.Are TKAs Performed in High-volume Hospitals Less Likely to Undergo Revision Than TKAs Performed in Low-volume Hospitals?Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases.Medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty: technical pearls.Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?40 years of the Oxford Knee.Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties are Performed on the Patients with Radiologically Too Mild Osteoarthritis.Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.Outcomes and early revision rate after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: prospective results from a non-designer single surgeon.3D printing and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons?

P2860

Q35728782-851307B9-CECC-44A8-9622-4E71B224F28A Q36391551-4C9BDD02-A42A-491C-8E56-13E3262B21C3 Q36391612-3B1C6BB5-9A44-44AF-9E19-C1661769545B Q38469009-38D6E9BC-E7DE-426A-8EEB-2B0566FD6530 Q38628036-47CBE502-5036-4B81-B07A-1C31CD9DE037 Q38955123-CE90E7AF-DCF6-4D63-93C9-6230396FFA0D Q38968163-CAE9675E-8281-4D02-8699-66EF5769328B Q40052963-B6D13F52-84A4-4570-A4D5-F2C449349EFB Q40277323-370E2677-267D-4806-8910-F710DC186A21 Q40289997-7A6AC656-C455-4324-81D7-D3F469AC0BA0 Q42388411-3A4F38B8-3C99-43D5-AEAD-9409C5077B26 Q47157869-0BB6C18D-2436-45C0-9B8A-2310FBE1365A Q47396404-229F15DD-2E66-4FAF-A9D9-067D5E635561 Q48113771-34B4B44E-49AD-4282-A606-345C499848E6 Q49561146-5732DA3C-DFEC-4930-83BB-F560908493D2 Q55021723-4EF1EF6B-0339-49EE-8BDC-A040139F0B1D Q55310995-2EEB11B1-2B45-42DA-98FF-F51FF3671495 Q58766066-18E37398-3123-488F-8B4D-6417943175EE

P2860

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33929096

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2014 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年学术文章

@wuu

2014年学术文章

@zh-cn

2014年学术文章

@zh-hans

2014年学术文章

@zh-my

2014年学术文章

@zh-sg

2014年學術文章

@yue

name

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@ast

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@en

type

label

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@ast

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@en

prefLabel

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@ast

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@en

P1433

Q33929096-AA2F24C3-4507-4E9F-8BCF-03CA17E29766

P1476

Q33929096-671187BB-066B-4AB1-B464-53C6D17DFDBD

P2093

Q33929096-1ED49153-A3E5-4E1F-BB34-25E689525C6D

Q33929096-5E4C439E-0442-4901-868C-0D0C38A1EBB0

Q33929096-9A92ABB2-6569-4FC6-A8F3-E56D7A1FC85E

Q33929096-CDBA9664-AEF9-4E93-9DA6-D1D343B1CE65

Q33929096-DB07039E-4969-40A8-8A67-B1C037642B34

P2860

Q33929096-049640B2-5CE0-4782-B382-30F6976E6958

Q33929096-190A2BFD-0033-439F-A0B1-23F6D4D2EF76

Q33929096-237985FE-B3F9-4A67-A200-4BAAC21A246B

Q33929096-24F499F2-58F8-4A3E-A3BB-9596A9F9410A

Q33929096-253A0D6C-F5C1-4D8F-8DA5-9EC465EA793C

Q33929096-3756984E-EB2E-4D17-95DA-7BF958C20D72

Q33929096-41B213EC-FAB3-4617-B700-7845039D9105

Q33929096-44579420-E490-4837-AEE2-87A31178E6F5

Q33929096-4EBEEFFB-0DCD-404B-B705-91ED0EF0E6DD

Q33929096-600BD957-B6F7-4625-8BF9-368CD262885F

P304

Q33929096-E7FB3B3E-A7F6-4775-A746-791D04A373CE

P31

Q33929096-66B6D3D4-A6A0-48FE-BF9A-6FEB317BB2E9

P356

Q33929096-EA310A0C-81CE-4873-AE0C-C01720FBC564

P433

Q33929096-3DCF714E-9556-4DF5-B25E-60D7D5E5AC51

P478

Q33929096-14CC03C3-6813-425E-B0AE-7AAE3168A533

P577

Q33929096-7E0DE04A-8706-490B-824A-038EA2483D67

P5875

Q33929096-9F9955FA-D047-437E-8E1D-9C0E2F4738F9

P698

Q33929096-763180CC-2FF1-4EB7-88E7-2B7E3FA254F1

P932

Q33929096-2B11CFC6-4AC5-4351-BFF8-2921CBDF9967

P356

17453674.2014.920990

P1433

Acta Orthopaedica

P1476

Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

@en

P2093

Birgitte Espehaug

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kari Indrekvam

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Leif I Havelin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mona Badawy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ove Furnes

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register

A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data.

Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data

Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear.

Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty?

Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a minimally invasive surgical procedure.

Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements.

P304

342-347

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.3109/17453674.2014.920990

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

85

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2014-05-21T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

262530363

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24847789

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4105763

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string