Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33956298

about

Effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence: a systematic review revealing research gaps Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primary care.Limited impact on endoscopy demand from a primary care based 'test and treat' dyspepsia management strategy: the results of a randomised controlled trial.The Data Protection Act (1998): implications for health researchers.Implementation salvage experiences from the Melbourne diabetes prevention study.Improving response rates using a monetary incentive for patient completion of questionnaires: an observational study.The external validity of published randomized controlled trials in primary care.Feasibility and acceptability of TRANSFoRm to improve clinical trial recruitment in primary care.Methods for determining disease burden and calibrating national surveillance data in the United Kingdom: the second study of infectious intestinal disease in the community (IID2 study).Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review Introducing case management for people with dementia in primary care: a mixed-methods study.Bridging the gap between basic science and clinical practice: the role of organizations in addressing clinician barriers A cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of eHealth-supported patient recruitment in primary care research: the TRANSFoRm study protocol Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions.Errors and adverse events in family medicine: developing and validating a Canadian taxonomy of errors.Disease management programme for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and heart failure in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Preventing and Lessening Exacerbations of Asthma in School-aged children Associated with a New Term (PLEASANT): Recruiting Primary Care Research Sites-the PLEASANT experience Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.Learning from failure--rationale and design for a study about discontinuation of randomized trials (DISCO study).The TrueBlue model of collaborative care using practice nurses as case managers for depression alongside diabetes or heart disease: a randomised trial.The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.What Study Design Should I Choose?Maximising recruitment and retention of general practices in clinical trials: a case study.Results of a randomized, prospective, double-dummy, double-blind trial to compare efficacy and safety of a herbal combination containing Tropaeoli majoris herba and Armoraciae rusticanae radix with co-trimoxazole in patients with acute and uncomplic Why do GPs exclude patients from participating in research? An exploration of adherence to and divergence from trial criteria.The views of dentists on their participation in a primary care-based research trial.Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials.Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland.The research needs of primary care.Impact of a deferred recruitment model in a randomised controlled trial in primary care (CREAM study).Asthma, disease management, and research: attempting to unravel a Gordian knot.Magnitude and characteristics of clinical trials in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional analysis.

P2860

Q26862555-CC0D75A9-59C5-4A67-84CC-2C2E3FE75D4B Q28366114-78F179AF-570A-469A-818F-81C6BACCADBD Q30482183-2821EB38-924F-4607-BEF0-45A3D29C90F5 Q30483074-B6883C4E-7CB1-4660-B661-2AC740B9D55D Q30659508-6116BB47-C755-46DB-B9A9-EBEE9EA961FE Q31095274-812F12C2-CA31-41B5-BB1C-44B72F80EF29 Q33275857-FDC6C8AF-49F0-4243-9343-E3CAE7BE1453 Q33400855-5A437A9F-274E-40AD-9197-EA9B5D908192 Q33446470-B082E6FC-13F9-4390-B629-BF0F8F128904 Q33571646-4908CB78-75AD-4BA3-951D-09FC86565504 Q34121705-05CD5958-4227-494A-B713-C5060C1FD206 Q34452636-757BB265-0BA6-4670-89B9-0A0692773988 Q34916145-CBA18358-352D-4DD4-BACD-DD1FCD0507C3 Q35052981-7153363C-D38E-4E47-8A60-CD46126A8FA8 Q35517881-C2B69AED-29CE-4342-A369-0D952E9B1F77 Q35941831-DE104BB7-6261-4D50-ACF6-C8126FA8BD3D Q36057220-6D075CB5-72EC-43FC-A7F8-6EEFDD6A3ABD Q36273119-643AE95B-7954-45C9-85E8-2AFFF473720F Q36482552-CE782058-A9CA-49DE-B8E4-54AE93B0F306 Q36483995-3374AE2E-1709-4F4C-B3F1-2D29EE7CDA2E Q36584126-35A9EB5E-69F1-4CB9-902D-2F8FF85DA867 Q36630078-FD01FEB0-BCF6-4658-BB82-F54BE53BE3CE Q36700515-25E32745-92C1-4A75-9308-79127A10B3E0 Q36950843-15D1B4A6-3E0E-4096-BA6C-A7BB1EEDAF9D Q37712373-2CB25638-CE27-4A98-8FBD-2C119229E262 Q39233027-A44E6C2B-13EA-4E76-82A1-04024A952F59 Q40074925-423FE7AC-553D-43E1-9CBF-BE028475C6F3 Q40638787-0386B287-92E8-46AF-A315-2B9435F67DE9 Q42650089-128C2109-32A2-44EA-A15E-66C1E947F656 Q42787367-8ECD1C92-95B3-40A8-BBF2-8ED5DD238659 Q47121934-98D891A6-CF66-4139-8389-626D6A6C63A5 Q49294397-9DF1874C-1CE5-4BD5-9BF1-C24BA64A2ADA Q52562536-66921D0D-B12A-4DA6-B0EE-090328969F2E

P2860

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33956298

description

2000 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2000 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2000 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2000年の論文

@ja

2000年論文

@yue

2000年論文

@zh-hant

2000年論文

@zh-hk

2000年論文

@zh-mo

2000年論文

@zh-tw

2000年论文

@wuu

name

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@ast

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@en

type

label

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@ast

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@en

prefLabel

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@ast

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@en

P1433

Q33956298-4B0B70B3-F74C-4240-8C7E-68959B76B32A

P1476

Q33956298-EBE7F7FC-5CDA-4E30-A3FF-00DCCA7B1618

P2093

Q33956298-02FE8D16-0D26-44D1-825E-A80545C5429A

Q33956298-3905BF23-F557-4C79-A292-26A50DFA081E

Q33956298-3D58AEA6-2515-4DA6-BB63-7A4166479BD3

Q33956298-84C078FD-1947-4801-A906-E96E44DDD5F2

Q33956298-B2CACB57-79FF-4084-A8B0-514B74DB2093

Q33956298-DA0CF303-5FE1-4321-BEE6-614504C84592

Q33956298-FEDD5BB3-7EA1-4C53-8DDD-C17CCD32F821

P2860

Q33956298-091B5F48-DA50-4A75-BD38-7AB149A02703

Q33956298-111BD0CB-9C71-4791-8C31-B1CD4500A630

Q33956298-13557082-8033-4CCC-825C-7325496536FE

Q33956298-138B6A59-81F7-45FE-93B9-A73ED5699B96

Q33956298-22ED3BCC-E437-40F7-A181-CD0BFBF68E74

Q33956298-3E04F250-59DB-4EE4-9A9D-2A26D4200945

Q33956298-4AA36CA6-B73F-439B-A52C-F5B222103B74

Q33956298-4CAE4CE2-93F3-42B0-91A7-A6D13E002EE3

Q33956298-6CEDCBF3-D47F-46A7-A41C-2EF73CC7DED1

Q33956298-81665EF5-9B9B-4BF9-88F7-F1D0BFB6A611

P304

Q33956298-D52C5E52-E91D-4557-BA7F-6EB2E5996682

P31

Q33956298-387ABDC8-D661-43DC-89FD-32A3452B5316

P356

Q33956298-0A34FDAC-9D64-44F3-BB22-0237EFC3597B

P407

Q33956298-3FF7BC70-B5E4-4CF9-9092-07669A85FEE3

P433

Q33956298-A5513D20-4EFE-4A23-9283-CA497DE00CED

P478

Q33956298-5C2BBF9C-A6C1-4C39-8752-A2C2E05CC98A

P577

Q33956298-AE5E22DF-9C3E-47D8-AA82-FB8FDA2D9CAD

P5875

Q33956298-1ECC2C31-57D3-4751-B847-691C36047ED8

P698

Q33956298-64F3DEBE-D170-4F41-8AEB-651FDA2E2913

P932

Q33956298-5850B7CA-0605-49AE-B57B-88B53377A179

P356

BMJ.321.7252.24

P1433

P1476

Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study.

@en

P2093

A M Wearn

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A Roalfe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

B C Delaney

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

F D Hobbs

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

L Roberts

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

S Wilson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

V Redman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group

Differences between generalist and specialist physicians regarding Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease

Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.

Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team.

Conducting randomized trials in general practice: methodological and practical issues.

What are pragmatic trials?

Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.

Cost effectiveness of screening for and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in management of dyspeptic patients under 45 years of age.

Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study.

P304

24-27

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/BMJ.321.7252.24

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

7252

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

321

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2000-07-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

12442805

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

10875830

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

27422

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string