Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial.
about
Esophageal surgery in minimally invasive eraCurrent management of esophageal cancerMorbidity analysis in minimally invasive esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer versus conventional over the last 10 years, a single institution experience.The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus.Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers.Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Preoperative chemoradiation with paclitaxel-carboplatin or with fluorouracil-oxaliplatin-folinic acid (FOLFOX) for resectable esophageal and junctional cancer: the PROTECT-1402, randomized phase 2 trial.Meta-analysis of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma.Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based AnalysisLaparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution.Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.Management of early-stage esophageal neoplasia (MESEN) consensus.Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.Inflammatory response in laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gastric cancer.Hybrid and total minimally invasive esophagectomy: how I do itPattern of Postoperative Mortality After Esophageal Cancer Resection According to Center Volume: Results from a Large European Multicenter Study.Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.Impact of laparoscopy on the prevention of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study.A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: approaches and outcomes.Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy vs. open esophagectomy: a matched case analysis in 120 patients.Assessment and comparison of recovery after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: an exploratory study in two centers.Principles of esophageal cancer surgery, including surgical approaches and optimal node dissection (2- vs. 3-field)Multicentre study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I and II oesophageal cancer.Changes in oncological outcomes: comparison of the conventional and minimally invasive esophagectomy, a single institution experience.Outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone position with laparoscopic gastric mobilization for esophageal cancer.Oncological feasibility of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: a single-institution comparative study.Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery.Discrepancy Between Clinical and Pathologic Nodal Status of Esophageal Cancer and Impact on Prognosis and Therapeutic Strategy.Minimally invasive esophagectomy with extracorporeal gastric conduit creation--how I do it.Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in esophageal cancer patients: a feasible and safe access for nutritional support during multimodal therapy.Comparison of perioperative outcomes following hybrid minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Risk factors for pulmonary morbidities after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Effectiveness Trials in Esophageal Cancer Resection Surgery.Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.Robot-Assisted Hybrid Esophagectomy Is Associated with a Shorter Length of Stay Compared to Conventional Transthoracic Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Study.[Endoscopic and surgical treatment of early gastric and esophageal carcinoma].[New S3 guideline for esophageal cancer : Important surgical aspects].
P2860
Q26769068-3E8CE9DE-4BD7-49FD-AA43-7A53110C1998Q33658207-34A17428-CAB8-44A9-82F1-30B1BC5676FFQ33837985-B85FA5EE-21E1-4B29-81EF-8437A273D812Q33854596-EA7A308A-5B62-4046-9E8D-E5B8FAA78D3BQ34380645-5551F4C8-B1BD-4F64-834D-0DA8DD21B2BCQ35256054-AF612EDB-F9BF-4E4E-95D5-144123ED664BQ35701804-1A2B3A69-5004-4E36-99B7-5F706519717BQ36021874-9F86ABF5-9E62-4B2A-B86F-742EB4B23A24Q36410500-71ED8536-F32B-4363-8714-0D107B3A4EF6Q36952530-80095E7E-0840-4BC2-AB26-82232CCA9FB4Q37481579-DDFC1A1E-3A4C-4EFF-8A6E-4323D62DB4CEQ37596192-6BD601FC-ACDD-4445-9629-F7435B9103AEQ38038486-59644EBA-03D4-484B-8D5B-A08C418A5C16Q38150209-1F1AE16A-CF40-4347-9D1C-5A51E48F404DQ38152969-D46A738D-E955-4AD3-B6F5-663D61C43F5DQ38213875-3B72E6C7-B349-4AB8-BBE5-11C6AC401B13Q38368788-ACC603B4-A193-4680-924B-B23113577D8AQ38392465-12C822FE-7826-4C09-88E4-AA41AEBE6016Q38610362-3DB4DC5B-19E1-4D5A-BEA4-AB95352CB33BQ38639617-438FDE20-C5D8-4F30-B2FD-B8C157747805Q38712797-9D1B449B-3D7F-4FA4-8B45-EC9C1E7AF360Q38892869-315ECEF8-03CD-4CFB-9BAE-33A804A05D71Q39023031-57B26F27-3ADD-49FF-9879-CB10302905E3Q39201867-345AB475-E565-4D8D-89B5-79C82CB265C4Q39265697-3909DE2B-5A52-4E8F-A630-4E2F4DB6839DQ39867686-B0C6F734-8DD9-415F-81F1-F091C99B7B43Q40581421-AF206E9B-BE82-47A3-B8D5-2168DB2E492DQ40735603-AC310FB4-4730-4243-BBF8-0635FB772749Q42620901-41C7C4F9-7334-4AE1-9402-88A9D0EC5A61Q42630983-823AA248-3333-4CAA-9ED1-DD4BE3EC345CQ44345567-90905D90-875D-4EDD-9F08-8762A7EBB0B6Q44781412-76202069-4B7B-455F-A318-A14F6C58DAD1Q45818724-CBB8C09A-2331-49EC-B0BC-ED895F143B43Q47109626-E6D517A9-E1A0-44A6-8975-59771226928AQ47255951-69AA11F3-CBBB-4301-8B73-61CB4F733451Q47950880-7FB4AD5F-FEB9-4CB6-8F86-AD42CCF3E381Q48118094-4B27CB34-9280-45C1-9632-E9A2BE9B11E5Q48180446-F2FAE6F1-E4A0-441B-A1F6-73F1F35F20A3Q50129952-96B0571F-839C-42F0-BF64-0A4621477C83Q52849942-AA553AB2-917C-438A-982F-6601D1159D13
P2860
Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
name
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@ast
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@en
type
label
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@ast
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@en
prefLabel
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@ast
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Open versus laparoscopically-a ...... se III trial - the MIRO trial.
@en
P2093
Christophe Doddoli
Christophe Mariette
Cécile Brigand
Denis Collet
Franck Bonnetain
Frédérique Peschaud
Guillaume Piessen
Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Jean-Yves Mabrut
Michel Prudhomme
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2407-11-310
P407
P577
2011-07-23T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1014159533