Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33971945

about

Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?The Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.Survivorship analysis of 150 consecutive patients with DIAM™ implantation for surgery of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome Percutaneous interspinous distraction device for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical and radiographic results at 2-year follow-up.Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar decompression & foraminoplasty: a 10 year prospective survivability outcome study of the treatment of foraminal stenosis and failed back surgery.Safety and efficacy of a new percutaneously implantable interspinous process device Morphometry of lumbar spinous process via three dimensional CT reconstruction in a Chinese population Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer Minimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the superion interspinous spacer.Bone resorption during the first year after implantation of a single-segment dynamic interspinous stabilization device and its risk factors.A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.Lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius perclid interspinous system.Spinous process morphology: the effect of ageing through adulthood on spinous process size and relationship to sagittal alignment Posterior dynamic stabilization in the lumbar spine - 24 months results of a prospective clinical and radiological study with an interspinous distraction device Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment.The interspinous spacer: a clinicoanatomical investigation using plastination.Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.Change of sagittal spinal alignment and its association with pain and function after lumbar surgery augmented with an interspinous implant.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Interbody Fusion in Low Grade Lumbar Spondylolsithesis: Clinical Outcome Does Not Correalte with Slip Reduction and Neural Foraminal Dimension.Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with microdecompression and interspinous distraction device insertion. A case series.Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based review.Utilization of Interspinous Devices Throughout the United States Over a Recent Decade: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial

P2860

Q21284518-4B1C34D2-E24F-4245-A2C6-8C5215ACFA9B Q26851225-DBBF1DBC-E27A-4C0E-8EE9-139F77965885 Q30318109-C7E3B739-CC6D-4CD0-9728-C47D8B95F220 Q30430735-B633FD66-9F0B-4D53-B66C-58728869C604 Q33589314-F8FDDB89-8EA5-45DD-95C3-F8F7556BA7F6 Q34538614-2C3701C3-314A-4082-9459-713AC03095D7 Q34619126-EFCB578C-F603-419C-9404-5B9921FCE693 Q34955995-11709347-FFD9-41E7-AE87-221FB69C75D3 Q35076079-55F29195-363C-4087-B6E5-89F19281BE0F Q35076103-7BD6BB38-FABC-4B44-B436-51681C7F86DD Q35083975-AAB776C1-6914-4388-90E7-EC86295A2ACA Q35173762-DD72A9CA-EB95-4B95-85D6-F5450414DFE7 Q35233368-56EFB4A3-B8C0-4184-B7D2-26832B29EDC1 Q35444249-40117E11-14A0-4B54-80EB-3CF39028613D Q35630995-333467F1-1536-42F3-B48B-44CBBE722F9C Q35758465-41C4BC4B-70BD-4A62-AA5E-C921D80D2249 Q35789118-C5E77FE3-3BD1-4AB6-B239-940610F1A4AB Q35828745-E3AAC358-36C5-4F46-A082-824BB6D56031 Q35886178-A58F4F31-91EE-452B-B157-39D9E12AC32C Q35916387-F26650FA-3791-460F-A0C3-CE5C17E74103 Q35927716-099E9B20-05C5-417C-8D17-7041B15DF546 Q36144976-3E1BED7B-4359-4B74-A530-0A3303E34B7E Q36151941-558DAEE1-DB68-45E7-9A21-2F095323365E Q37173805-2D94ED2C-5B42-4A50-9F3F-EC8B1CB20139 Q37182471-BB061A6A-1812-42A2-A3D2-E11C16AA6392 Q37503616-CFC378BE-A449-473F-BF57-B6D40EB54FD7 Q37615686-1F5086A9-ADAC-4DB1-A505-A0C63D436D2A Q37660188-69DCA207-124C-4995-A603-B28F9310AB3A Q37897539-F7A017E1-D079-4F55-A82E-46EDEE584436 Q38889936-C2AFCAB7-0ACD-4B08-8815-CD2165AD9917 Q38967550-44F73B18-5F99-4259-9133-F9B1A6442F48 Q40369411-62FD99D8-A40B-4CE7-94AD-4998AA87FC24 Q40959692-7E0DED8E-920E-4A89-954C-553D0E05993B Q42936137-357E1412-8743-4107-A1FA-E0480B3D0017 Q53839698-DE8647FD-6834-4B02-8A6E-2FDAA1CF6CF4 Q55427551-7843BCBE-E058-4BA8-8659-E4BCBA359754 Q59114988-F73535A5-E6A6-4959-956F-18BDC7252555

P2860

Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33971945

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2009 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年論文

@yue

2009年論文

@zh-hant

2009年論文

@zh-hk

2009年論文

@zh-mo

2009年論文

@zh-tw

2009年论文

@wuu

name

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@ast

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@en

type

label

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@ast

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@en

prefLabel

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@ast

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@en

P1433

Q33971945-A929B094-73AE-4C2D-A00E-E63F3AA214F1

P1476

Q33971945-3AABF11F-648E-4BCA-AED9-95E004D3E64A

P2093

Q33971945-2BC2D03D-8C3A-4392-80CA-21DD9CE85F50

Q33971945-2FCBA928-E871-4190-AD2E-485A4BC2EF64

Q33971945-41CCB05B-DDD3-40AF-A24B-E0B678451CA0

Q33971945-518569D2-5B3F-410A-882D-62F6B0462A39

Q33971945-5CEBA9E1-A5A6-48EC-9426-EE9183E97FA2

Q33971945-5F77680C-7041-4753-A4F8-E26366F971A4

Q33971945-7F0EDFC8-C1C2-4F08-891F-14EE7A2E4913

Q33971945-974DFEC5-EAC0-40C8-8E9E-43169BDC772C

Q33971945-F12A479E-C6E0-472C-91F7-884D6224CE40

P2860

Q33971945-15543349-6AF3-420E-BF60-27D042B3FBE9

Q33971945-15604924-6FC2-45B2-BBAB-93F0A9DB07DA

Q33971945-1DE8CAD6-B70C-4143-B543-76B59713D108

Q33971945-1DFE0A6B-A589-48E6-BBC6-EB97C4429614

Q33971945-21BEA389-2095-4E94-9B19-A4DEEE22586B

Q33971945-2950AF6B-A0E0-497A-98F8-10B32BBC03F7

Q33971945-374E83C9-28D2-4E78-AB5A-C26DDA71CB85

Q33971945-492970C6-210D-49AA-B0CD-794496C8DCBC

Q33971945-539DDA71-6444-46D2-9F72-78036C9671CC

Q33971945-61A6BFE1-BDEE-4710-9225-86996BA941DD

P2888

Q33971945-00CFE9D4-4D49-4375-BC2A-1B1A85BC50B4

P304

Q33971945-85B151C6-A4A7-4822-9C47-03D904E567C7

P31

Q33971945-7CF6EF38-42FC-460B-BE7A-991C1A8A43BE

P356

Q33971945-8693E8BE-D5CF-45F0-943A-B90FC5BD88FD

P433

Q33971945-F9647E97-658F-473C-908C-B0C6AA5C0383

P478

Q33971945-B135998C-B336-487C-9F85-E937659D512F

P577

Q33971945-37BB736B-0C2A-4980-B1CA-B883485C15F9

P5875

Q33971945-9DFC1630-EAB0-49C0-BA48-98E3693F10BC

P698

Q33971945-EBA61219-EA6F-4F3C-8BC0-76E34AE45E1A

P932

Q33971945-9776FF80-1FAF-4F68-87D9-5AF011BE8D82

P356

S00586-009-1081-Y

P1433

European Spine Journal

P1476

Interspinous implants (X Stop, ...... rameters and clinical outcome?

@en

P2093

Britta Joswig

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hartmut Stützer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Johannes Kuchta

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Klaus Schlüter-Brust

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marc Röllinghoff

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick Simons

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Peer Eysel

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rolf Sobottke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas Kaulhausen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Clinical practice. Lumbar spinal stenosis

Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography.

Prevalence of symptoms of cervical and lumbar stenosis among participants in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis

Lumbar spinal stenosis: anatomy and pathogenesis.

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR imaging.

Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine.

The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.

Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study.

P2888

s00586-009-1081-y

P304

1494-1503

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00586-009-1081-Y

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

18

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2009-06-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

26326449

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19562386

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2899374

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string