Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
about
Are phenomenology and postpositivism strange bedfellows?The development and evaluation of mutual support groups in long-term care homes.How nurses understand and care for older people with delirium in the acute hospital: a Critical Discourse Analysis.Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology.ParticipACTION: Baseline assessment of the capacity available to the 'New ParticipACTION': A qualitative study of Canadian organizations.Preserving personhood of individuals with advanced dementia: lessons from family caregiversImproving validity of informed consent for biomedical research in Zambia using a laboratory exposure interventionParents' perspectives on safety in neonatal intensive care: a mixed-methods study.Coping with preclinical disability: older women's experiences of everyday activities.Handoffs and Patient Safety: Grasping the Story and Painting a Full Picture.Tobacco document research reportingTe Pākeketanga: living and dying in advanced age--a study protocol.Enhancing the Ethical Conduct of HIV Research with Migrant Sex Workers: Human Rights, Policy, and Social Contextual Influences.Managing Matajoosh: determinants of first Nations' cancer care decisions."Sometimes I've gone home feeling that my voice hasn't been heard": a focus group study exploring the views and experiences of health care assistants when caring for dying residentsGrowing Up Before Their Time: The Early Adultification Experiences of Homeless Young People.Pulled in or pushed out? Understanding the complexities of motivation for alternative therapies use in Ghana."Eyes that don't see, heart that doesn't feel": coping with sex work in intimate relationships and its implications for HIV/STI prevention.Nurses' perspectives on the intersection of safety and informed decision making in maternity careTechnology-Enabled Remote Monitoring and Self-Management - Vision for Patient Empowerment Following Cardiac and Vascular Surgery: User Testing and Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendationsEnd-user involvement in a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research of non-pharmacological interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder delivered in school settings: reflections on the impacts and challenges.Seeing it through their eyes: a qualitative study of the pregnancy experiences of women with a body mass index of 30 or more.How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.Adolescents' Perception of the Psychosocial Factors affecting Sustained Engagement in Sports and Physical Activity.Structural and Interpersonal Benefits and Risks of Participation in HIV Research: Perspectives of Female Sex Workers in Guatemala.Allocation of Rehabilitation Services for Older Adults in the Ontario Home Care System.Can't buy my love: a typology of female sex workers' commercial relationships in the Mexico-U.S. Border Region.Evaluating the impact of Mexico's drug policy reforms on people who inject drugs in Tijuana, B.C., Mexico, and San Diego, CA, United States: a binational mixed methods research agenda.Protocol for the evaluation of a digital storytelling approach to address stigma and improve readiness to seek services among veteransExploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups.Unmasking identity dissonance: exploring medical students' professional identity formation through mask makingShedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking.Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research.Issues of representation within qualitative inquiry.Health care needs assessment among adolescents in correctional institutions in Zambia: an ethical analysis.Sociocultural hegemony, gendered identity, and use of traditional and complementary medicine in Ghana.Sustaining hope as a moral competency in the context of aggressive care.Nursing children after a disaster: a qualitative study of nurse volunteers and children after the Haiti earthquake.Contraception knowledge and attitudes: truths and myths among African Australian teenage mothers in Greater Melbourne, Australia.
P2860
Q30333387-0C66F2DD-6090-4EA1-B8FA-134697857F22Q30361917-508CDE52-D6E9-4A3B-B855-76EA49F19FB0Q30415999-86DE0D28-C448-4364-982D-97AFC2567DB6Q33439961-6D39040B-7EE0-44CB-AD40-0E5066FD3B5DQ33552621-30D42B99-08C5-4604-86BA-72B156942E8DQ34257192-FED8883A-026E-4098-B6FE-C39F5475D6E2Q34257927-F6CC180C-144F-4D5F-B6F1-323DA4258EE0Q34345271-753DF380-3DAF-430E-A933-69AEBB904850Q34675006-A51C8A81-32CE-4A3B-B79B-4A133D3A6426Q34744584-F85194C7-6AED-4556-9746-558C11F09D74Q35539584-79F1A024-5D17-479A-A6A4-E08D458EB7FEQ35874794-90A41492-B886-4284-9CE7-4369CCBAA617Q36012159-D4D382DD-617F-41DF-B13B-376FDF527DAAQ36107234-3AF4344B-5FBD-4DFE-80A2-E76AFDA5F8CBQ36108240-ED09F634-53BA-4630-9E89-39EC621E3147Q36701214-F7F42262-8853-427B-96B8-7E94D205D387Q36731675-4EF104D0-2BF1-4A69-872C-784B7F447027Q36824993-1090AEC4-AB58-4F91-A6F4-9C92B0A53B4EQ37205230-F4479A7A-B1D9-4C35-9673-B84AAB99B54FQ37207761-40E8ED69-BEA0-4AF1-B2F9-AA5D74F2A0C1Q37216051-8770E4D2-CD4A-4B84-9D63-580FBD1CB18FQ37316547-8EC05C62-2430-490A-9621-D2C78CC2F512Q37321395-8C8FE62A-7FA9-41C9-AF5F-4F9FD9EDEF07Q37329321-2796EB1A-B086-4923-AD4C-E3A6C8916055Q37341478-B5A686B7-056F-4BB8-9CCA-64FECDE44CF2Q37407387-A6C3A3DC-8A75-45BF-8EB4-112A219C5E18Q37445853-3B7106D8-62EF-4992-92A9-842EBC030740Q37473187-65768D53-F1F2-46AE-A24C-622625C1C3F1Q37620940-8F466F5C-D5C1-41F3-97E3-25761176164CQ37649101-20AB6362-07DD-4520-B6B8-1C4D29A3640AQ37681998-8D443628-C5F1-41E3-A5DC-7D50DD9C1401Q37740391-62B28D99-3B45-42E9-A439-FB6CE3D3B4F5Q38439082-BEE589DA-3327-4228-A9B5-BF5AD22870FBQ38508784-FAC77F8E-A3BF-4564-909A-BCBF36FAAB75Q38521703-2EA4A6E6-0F0A-4667-ACC1-E8F361C6F116Q38613705-5859291A-404F-4C16-B73E-C24AAC0CDCDCQ38826999-8108F38A-300C-48B0-96E0-FA33FEA97BC2Q39113020-BBC39935-9491-4BC0-8459-2FE2039D59ACQ39223820-A35260E7-C864-4A9A-BD13-582CBE68FA5BQ39302057-EDB1F6F1-070E-4164-9CDA-9A53E1933423
P2860
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@ast
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@en
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@nl
type
label
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@ast
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@en
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@nl
prefLabel
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@ast
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@en
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/104973230001000308
P577
2000-05-01T00:00:00Z