The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: are judges effective gatekeepers?
about
Can jurors recognize missing control groups, confounds, and experimenter bias in psychological science?I spy with my little eye: jurors' detection of internal validity threats in expert evidenceBest Practices: How to Evaluate Psychological Science for Use by OrganizationsAdversarial allegiance: The devil is in the evidence details, not just on the witness stand.What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: a survey of the courts and bar.Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
P2860
The effects of peer review and evidence quality on judge evaluations of psychological science: are judges effective gatekeepers?
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@ast
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@en
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@nl
type
label
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@ast
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@en
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@nl
prefLabel
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@ast
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@en
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@nl
P1476
The effects of peer review and ...... judges effective gatekeepers?
@en
P2093
McAuliff BD
P304
P356
10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.574
P577
2000-08-01T00:00:00Z