The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review.
about
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screeningGenetic risk and behavioural changeFamily physicians' perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer controlUnderstanding non-compliance to colorectal cancer screening: a case control study, nested in a randomised trial [ISRCTN83029072].What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic reviewColorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectivesInfluences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative studyMethods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups.Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008Geography, private costs and uptake of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a remote rural areaPrevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public: a community survey.Impact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening.Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio programHealth beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey.Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice?Finding the minimal intervention needed for sustained mammography adherence.Enhanced invitation methods to increase uptake of NHS health checks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings.Evidence from community level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findingsIncreasing informed uptake and non-uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic reviewStudy protocol of a parent-focused child feeding and dietary intake intervention: the feeding healthy food to kids randomised controlled trialNon-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.An experience of qualified preventive screening: shiraz smart screening software.Screening: The information individuals need to support their decision: per protocol analysis is better than intention-to-treat analysis at quantifying potential benefits and harms of screening.Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.Influences on the uptake of diabetes screening: a qualitative study in primary care.Evaluating the effectiveness of GP endorsement on increasing participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialThe costs of offering HPV-testing on self-taken samples to non-attendees of cervical screening in Finland.Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.Who gets a mammogram amongst European women aged 50-69 years?Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic reviewBreast and cervical cancer screening in Great Britain: Dynamic interrelated processes.Who attends a UK diabetes screening programme? Findings from the ADDITION-Cambridge study.Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Analysis of the Determinants of Low Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake Among Nigerian Women.Determinants of a GP visit and cervical cancer screening examination in Great Britain.Quality-assured screening for diabetic retinopathy delivered in primary care in Ireland: an observational study.Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.
P2860
Q24234462-4EAC451C-A45F-4687-AE36-139B43E53D36Q24525204-C67A1B56-3B4C-4674-9C4A-E5387D14F558Q24803079-F4DB8116-7B3B-486D-91BB-1C12FC663C00Q25257106-9D73746B-9BC0-4C39-A450-8B3D47A394BDQ26828499-B3A162AC-8830-4889-8FB4-D6CE9531B7E6Q26858827-7196B5E4-AE1B-4D2D-9F2F-A16D7245F506Q27306063-16217A67-DA8B-42B8-87F4-9F3678CCE034Q30540772-8178CE10-2D0A-4515-8ED7-7128FEA533E8Q30619674-D2F4249C-283B-4B07-AEA4-4BFADF813EB6Q30724046-835DAE62-0DFF-4F18-AD8F-A4D0D877BC37Q33237944-0801593A-2503-4B8D-AE21-5259137BDE03Q33255375-125B960F-FBCF-4DB4-8ECE-7704B0ED087DQ33328300-A1B21E0D-A898-4411-B2C5-ECC5C03742D1Q33370644-54E55766-A7D2-442B-8996-AB508D667563Q33651370-8A61B6AB-A8F1-44E3-9AC2-A403EEE85B29Q33792698-AAAF2AEA-818E-418E-8744-80D5D9D8912AQ33890708-B7EF966B-9745-4B16-94C0-5C0AC71B6728Q34129706-3AF76711-E177-4A4B-B07D-06C06566BFAAQ34143757-7571164A-3D09-4324-9303-64BA4C8C9E99Q34163538-14AD2E5E-4BB2-49F0-A033-5B78D54550B6Q34163544-F3A81AF5-19E4-4832-BF81-8EF163A9D1CBQ34255346-2E0A835D-46FB-4970-80A0-8E82873F2422Q34354271-E9F9846D-60CE-4F4A-B11A-AF69D512C5A4Q34436894-1105C7B9-3AE8-4E1E-A798-A51AF3D7C9C0Q34990509-F51A8BE5-4DB1-4B0C-B6AD-2A248DB8CB12Q35134216-93A0787A-4D23-44D7-A539-FE89BDE3506CQ35544843-CD66238E-581A-4B9B-8C4D-03ED5CD1790FQ35788713-C47117E0-7617-4F26-BA65-0066F2E55B4FQ35833928-B180887C-154A-4150-97AD-2EFD6592499BQ35834302-0472F4E3-62BD-48C9-AF0D-7413316AD484Q35974499-D0FD4B6B-5686-4C19-AD3F-848F9457FE79Q36110781-0CC14C0C-0705-43E4-BBCE-E93AEE6CA94FQ36144946-0D9C98EB-B1D6-45B0-9374-EF0B6E8004CCQ36192168-AC0B5C2C-6B60-4C6B-B549-E5B00BC77C92Q36193178-32EBD2D7-CEDF-4727-81A5-42378E80F557Q36251697-BE98E6AD-2A8F-46ED-9501-7EF504AADE9CQ36309858-4F92F228-F0C8-4B85-8E22-A1D383A89254Q36335865-1E2EFDEB-6E64-4A70-A477-805EBA599E85Q36558169-E1435ADF-B2EB-4EA3-B1DF-C33C14E90DB0Q36768607-F2156ACD-1BB3-49B2-8EAE-EF493908FE0A
P2860
The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review.
description
2000 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2000 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2000 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2000年の論文
@ja
2000年論文
@yue
2000年論文
@zh-hant
2000年論文
@zh-hk
2000年論文
@zh-mo
2000年論文
@zh-tw
2000年论文
@wuu
name
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@ast
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@en
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@ast
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@en
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@ast
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@en
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P1476
The determinants of screening ...... g uptake: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P304
i-vii, 1-133
P577
2000-01-01T00:00:00Z