Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure.
about
The Latent Structure of Autistic Traits: A Taxometric, Latent Class and Latent Profile Analysis of the Adult Autism Spectrum Quotient.Risky business: factor analysis of survey data - assessing the probability of incorrect dimensionalisation.Combining Parallel and Exploratory Factor Analysis in Identifying Relationship Scales in Secondary Data.Validation of the revised piper fatigue scale in Koreans with chronic hepatitis BExploration of ecological factors related to the spatial heterogeneity of tuberculosis prevalence in P. R. China.Exploratory graph analysis: A new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research.Developing a clinical teaching quality questionnaire for use in a university osteopathic pre-registration teaching program.Therapist perception of treatment outcome: Evaluating treatment outcomes among youth with antisocial behavior problems.Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Leeds Attitudes to Concordance II scaleThe Complex Trauma Questionnaire (ComplexTQ): development and preliminary psychometric properties of an instrument for measuring early relational traumaImproving outcomes for caregivers through treatment of young people affected by war: a randomized controlled trial in Sierra Leone.Placental epigenetic patterning of glucocorticoid response genes is associated with infant neurodevelopment.The Use of GDS-15 in Detecting MDD: A Comparison Between Residents in a Thai Long-Term Care Home and Geriatric OutpatientsAn Examination of the Partner Cyber Abuse Questionnaire in a College Student Sample.Czech version of OPQOL-35 questionnaire: the evaluation of the psychometric properties.Psychometric properties of the Symptom Checklist-90 in adolescent psychiatric inpatients and age- and gender-matched community youthCharacterizing Early Maternal Style in a Population of Guide DogsAn inflammatory gene signature distinguishes neurofibroma Schwann cells and macrophages from cells in the normal peripheral nervous systemMeasurement properties of the chinese weinstein noise sensitivity scale.Development and Testing of the Nurse Manager EBP Competency Scale.Temperament and problem solving in a population of adolescent guide dogs.The current state and future of factor analysis in personality disorder research.Development and Initial Validation of the Five-Factor Model Adolescent Personality Questionnaire (FFM-APQ).A Factor Analysis Approach for Clustering Patient Reported Outcomes.Development and Validation of the Dissociative Symptoms Scale.The Polish version of the Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire: an exploratory structural equation modeling approach.The Structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory With Binary and Rating Scale Items.The Math-Biology Values Instrument: Development of a Tool to Measure Life Science Majors' Task Values of Using Math in the Context of Biology.Nursing students' attitudes towards information and communication technology: an exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic approach.Development of a Microsoft Excel tool for applying a factor retention criterion of a dimension coefficient to a survey on patient safety culture.A structural equation model of the relationship between insomnia, negative affect, and paranoid thinking.Validation of the Polish version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire among women.Cognitive manipulation of brain electric microstates.Development and Initial Validation of the Multicultural Personality Inventory (MPI).A critical evaluation of the validity and the reliability of global competency constructs for supervisor assessment of junior medical trainees.Accuracy of Revised and Traditional Parallel Analyses for Assessing Dimensionality with Binary Data.Type I and Type II Error Rates and Overall Accuracy of the Revised Parallel Analysis Method for Determining the Number of Factors.Persistent neuronal activity in human prefrontal cortex links perception and action.Relative Accuracy of Two Modified Parallel Analysis Methods that Use the Proper Reference DistributionA Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validation of the Vulnerable Attachment Style Questionnaire
P2860
Q30828803-9011641F-1893-421F-B9A0-D7B8F0D296B5Q30912426-E4E790DD-A52C-48E8-8D54-E1E16DB27D8BQ31009975-74223D22-DFD5-422E-8BFD-0829DBC3D673Q33718992-DD79BCF1-D02F-41A8-B2FE-9BA73E08564EQ33756001-C0EF04F1-C6EA-4F11-99B3-A31C56C011DDQ33782601-2C33C1DB-F0D7-4ADA-835B-560E1FF0B9A1Q35605746-6FD005FD-338D-430A-86D7-399178844607Q35706261-36591B5E-826F-445E-9EBF-B95F609BC771Q35732652-F8E3E808-E7C8-482B-A920-E6AD2486365BQ36014108-A356814E-8E60-4B22-9088-0AC9D2595C71Q36347010-1E6EB018-EE05-4FC0-94A3-8CC4381E5DC4Q36636142-ECEB662A-3A88-4540-B0EB-9E3A179B03EEQ36695993-4874928F-F2C1-4A8E-AD5F-D61DB73890E6Q36710764-F5817441-9B78-4166-A5B4-3D7A577A868CQ37018196-3794E601-2A17-45B5-9EA0-3E56C39F72CAQ37096866-C6B980B9-FA25-4CC4-B7B3-6D9698455CBEQ37634726-FA4E2640-D228-43F7-B61D-4376A21BA64AQ37678642-B6BBF33D-344E-455E-BEF1-1A84D5C3A371Q38620661-EA54FDC0-ED66-4120-A8BE-110B835B612FQ38635493-9751DCD7-144C-41E6-A0A6-B1FD8B4B5056Q38684890-9D77699A-1489-4697-BE84-025DFC1EC4CDQ38775321-9BC4A18C-EA57-4233-97CA-C364A10D614DQ39248213-2498A3B2-973D-444D-906D-B0316A076F1CQ39428906-D872D4F2-79C9-4D40-981D-04A9D82B4D43Q39766769-5D399637-7DC0-48EE-89C7-4A6C76EEE68BQ40727208-FBA25880-333D-4FA0-8CAD-6698084DF8D3Q40943957-B37EC6C0-C240-4EDE-ACFC-76C90B03AE86Q41560038-0A733B6A-CF74-497F-AC8C-D44BA8546422Q41586910-E0D2A38D-64A3-46BA-8B43-DD0F3B78CA70Q45136960-65348BCD-78AE-4D0A-8499-BEFC8B0B73C2Q45363836-59F9E52A-D255-4124-85C6-EBD11E4CB781Q48064754-B81DBA63-6812-491B-B6C7-DA618EEF2488Q48464151-7601A6A7-BE39-4B93-8CFC-F917E3EBD499Q50756158-28FE050D-77B6-4298-88AF-CFCF0D9D0C5DQ51304536-A0C09392-31B0-4804-B3CA-609590FD9515Q55055624-29B0DEE9-C7F2-41F7-8099-30616FFAFCA1Q55333520-BF378F17-0F6B-4ADD-8CCC-858A77AECDDAQ55453055-AFA8A875-17DF-45A2-9114-B2050691FECBQ57172004-4B8AAE3A-AD19-4B06-A369-564E5970E3B1Q58220950-35C71CC7-5216-4B1C-83B7-51E92BF83475
P2860
Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of known factorial structure.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@ast
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@en
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@nl
type
label
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@ast
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@en
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@nl
prefLabel
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@ast
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@en
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@nl
P356
P1476
Determining the number of fact ...... of known factorial structure.
@en
P2093
Brendan Roche
John Ruscio
P304
P356
10.1037/A0025697
P577
2011-10-03T00:00:00Z