Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens

Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34042389

about

Prevalence of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Netherlands: retrospective analysis of samples from an established cohort Prevalence of human xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related gammaretrovirus (XMRV) in Dutch prostate cancer patients Critical evaluation of HPV16 gene copy number quantification by SYBR green PCR.Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.PIK3CA-mediated PI3-kinase signalling is essential for HPV-induced transformation in vitro Acquisition and persistence of human papillomavirus 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-18 among men with high-HPV viral load infections in a circumcision trial in Kisumu, Kenya Epstein-Barr virus mRNA profiles and viral DNA methylation status in nasopharyngeal brushings from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients reflect tumor origin Can quantifying free-circulating DNA in plasma be used to identify subjects with high-grade pre-invasive endobronchial lesions?Comparison of GP5+/6+-PCR and SPF10-line blot assays for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in samples from women with normal cytology results who develop grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Persistence of HPV infection and risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a cohort of Colombian women.Zip Nucleic Acids: new high affinity oligonucleotides as potent primers for PCR and reverse transcription.Higher HPV16 and HPV18 Penile Viral Loads Are Associated With Decreased Human Papillomavirus Clearance in Uncircumcised Kenyan Men.Epstein-Barr virus-targeted therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Detection of the Escherichia coli pathogenic gene eae with three real-time polymerase chain reaction methods.

P2860

Q24641871-F4E8DF1C-9EF4-4E9F-9D58-CF63FA049115 Q28294334-71E2AEAD-7B66-4D0E-8E9E-BB3BAAC5333A Q33354767-29C141E9-4835-47CA-A7DE-D62CE154CB49 Q35073445-E073966A-3A60-4E09-99FA-624699F0B79A Q35089274-57A660B9-A2A1-4077-B9F3-837A6F6D069D Q35474263-8AFBE765-2A8C-4AE7-8B39-C75EFB5FC76E Q36124331-EB390A40-C881-4827-B7FA-A251681603B8 Q36919313-CDC259FA-C0BE-4C78-850B-A6228952F3CE Q36933532-FBFD8AA6-3C81-4D36-A2D8-F96490863AC0 Q37160670-14476159-E555-496C-86C7-F4DF1A599810 Q38351257-415284D0-889B-426D-8AFE-2F4A40609EDC Q40579967-12B5361B-3A4F-4E18-9C84-BA6F2BC19FA4 Q42145376-5FD56FB2-20AB-4FA3-857D-F079D69EEAF5 Q50681358-318A8EE0-A634-4356-AFC6-76FE20C59AF8

P2860

Comparison of three different PCR methods for quantifying human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in cervical scrape specimens

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34042389

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2005 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年論文

@yue

2005年論文

@zh-hant

2005年論文

@zh-hk

2005年論文

@zh-mo

2005年論文

@zh-tw

2005年论文

@wuu

name

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@ast

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@en

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@nl

type

label

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@ast

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@en

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@nl

prefLabel

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@ast

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@en

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@nl

P1433

Q34042389-BB21ACED-15FE-4521-B180-FF7F82213358

P1476

Q34042389-61A60D53-68B4-4D29-AA7C-9F93FF2AA2FD

P2093

Q34042389-050B98DA-CBC1-424D-B08F-092CC590D2E1

Q34042389-102BE04F-DA17-4C72-B36B-96220C2804C6

Q34042389-53918DE0-E14C-4EFD-ABD4-CFFC99B1DA1E

Q34042389-8A6956D3-3804-4465-ABB8-80D38D079245

Q34042389-9B1C7163-4ECE-451D-A128-730F07F1D21E

Q34042389-F24B1BB1-7E11-47E3-A457-C2D8C8417357

Q34042389-F55C9A39-2080-44CD-8D03-D4AA3E85A44B

P2860

Q34042389-2EC1A0C7-A7DA-4C27-83AA-38E42960EB40

Q34042389-3D81B76C-C5AE-41EB-8FB0-F73779B21BDA

Q34042389-556AABE7-1A38-45DB-B149-880B1CEF729F

Q34042389-567AB6B5-E0DE-4181-B759-9343D0A1D634

Q34042389-7673DE58-D0A6-4E2D-A4E8-40D1FBA58216

Q34042389-9B1FFD75-ED7A-44D8-82E0-3962791EB73C

Q34042389-A0F84A96-F958-4A66-8B8E-F59C1BB28886

Q34042389-A1600722-3A3D-44A3-81F4-15791B1F0D40

Q34042389-A965031F-4712-4A15-8C52-ED2506C4B810

Q34042389-B98CEB00-2EFE-440F-AAC3-466171E6CB80

P304

Q34042389-E8891C4B-32B5-46C6-85F6-6C7466C110D0

P31

Q34042389-22782770-4DCA-4ADB-98D0-1A8C7005D6DC

P356

Q34042389-688401CA-4D17-43E3-87D8-915DF2C67195

P407

Q34042389-411DA2F0-290C-44CC-9723-702936D3D24E

P433

Q34042389-11F4988C-F860-4C9A-B033-4F7212414BE2

P478

Q34042389-A236B32B-0280-4405-8258-081768034F02

P577

Q34042389-286953D8-53D7-4FD3-9581-25FE9D31FFD6

P5875

Q34042389-7B755A76-39AA-4E50-9D58-ADCCD24D3FA5

P698

Q34042389-17027CB9-8B71-4518-AF46-217C0C442831

P932

Q34042389-81A3CE77-6C8E-4190-9286-DCBC1C807F78

P356

JCM.43.9.4868-4871.2005

P1433

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

P1476

Comparison of three different ...... A in cervical scrape specimens

@en

P2093

A J C van den Brule

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A T Hesselink

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

C J L M Meijer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Berkhof

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M Molano

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P J F Snijders

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Z M A Groothuismink

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer

Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide

GP5+/6+ PCR followed by reverse line blot analysis enables rapid and high-throughput identification of human papillomavirus genotypes.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA copy number is dependent on grade of cervical disease and HPV type

The clinical relevance of human papillomavirus testing: relationship between analytical and clinical sensitivity.

The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996.

A general primer GP5+/GP6(+)-mediated PCR-enzyme immunoassay method for rapid detection of 14 high-risk and 6 low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical scrapings

Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study.

Comparison of quantitative competitive PCR with LightCycler-based PCR for measuring Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in clinical specimens

P304

4868-4871

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1128/JCM.43.9.4868-4871.2005

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

43

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-09-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

7616636

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

16145162

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

1234115

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string