Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
about
Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparencyGathering and learning from relevant clinical data: a new frameworkConflicts of interest among authors of clinical practice guidelines for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusExpanding disease definitions in guidelines and expert panel ties to industry: a cross-sectional study of common conditions in the United StatesConflict of interest policies for organizations producing a large number of clinical practice guidelinesA critical appraisal of the quality of adult dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry guidelines in osteoporosis using the AGREE II tool: An EuroAIM initiative.Clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements in oncology--an assessment of their methodological quality.Characteristics of physicians receiving large payments from pharmaceutical companies and the accuracy of their disclosures in publications: an observational study.Quality of clinical practice guidelines for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusUnderreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study.Managing conflicts of interest in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines programme: qualitative studyCritical Appraisal of the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis.Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a case study analysis of guidelines from the Canadian Medical Association Infobase.Knowledge transfer: what drug information would specialist doctors need to support their clinical practice? Results of a survey and of three focus groups in Italy.Policies on Conflicts of Interest in Health Care Guideline Development: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Conflict of interest disclosures for clinical practice guidelines in the national guideline clearinghouse.Disclosures of conflicts of interest in psychiatric review articles.Financial Relationships between Organizations That Produce Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Biomedical Industry: A Cross-Sectional Study.Trustworthy patient decision aids: a qualitative analysis addressing the risk of competing interestsStandardized Clinical Assessment And Management Plans (SCAMPs) provide a better alternative to clinical practice guidelines.Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review.Conflict of interest reporting in otolaryngology clinical practice guidelines.An explanation of recommendation differences: illustrations from recent atrial fibrillation guidelines.From caveat emptor to caveat venditor: time to stop the influence of money on practice guideline development.Setting the research agenda for improving health care in musculoskeletal disorders.Primary care clinical practice guidelines in South Africa: qualitative study exploring perspectives of national stakeholders.A critical appraisal of the quality of adult musculoskeletal ultrasound guidelines using the AGREE II tool: an EuroAIM initiative.Quality assessment of osteoporosis clinical practice guidelines for physical activity and safe movement: an AGREE II appraisal.Transparency ethics in practice: Revisiting financial conflicts of interest disclosure forms in clinical practice guidelines.Electronic Health Records and the Disappearing Patient.Risk awareness and transparency.Guidelines for the Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Development Process and Methodology.The quality of clinical practice guidelines in China: a systematic assessment.Evaluation of Industry Relationships Among Authors of Otolaryngology Clinical Practice Guidelines.Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines.It's NOT FAIR! Or is it? The promise and the tyranny of evidence-based performance assessment.Developing a Clinician Friendly Tool to Identify Useful Clinical Practice Guidelines: G-TRUST.Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use.Individual and Institutional Corruption in European and US Healthcare: Overview and Link of Various Corruption Typologies.Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust.
P2860
Q24658631-06FF1FAA-0788-4FDD-8334-4DD8D9747CEBQ27318717-7ECA6E77-6F1D-477C-B781-3B94666D4391Q28534390-F4709BBF-A639-40BC-BF32-876BD69F9744Q28682030-65C66545-E25A-4498-95EA-5DF2E450B60FQ28729747-B7CCFB35-5F3F-4624-8AA9-12498973EC15Q33708348-37A5C132-F970-4DA2-880C-BCAFC803E4C6Q34362184-16A95BE9-722E-4F10-868B-8C1A30AE2038Q34421838-454F59CA-D65A-49A5-B9DA-5E1C1B1B9E40Q34663542-32373843-3A9C-4F98-8250-3B011950A380Q34705062-98A47688-FC20-41D0-A4C9-E7173B7E2564Q35220149-A8ADE088-5F69-481E-BED5-A13C4A23105FQ36010776-857D1CED-CDF3-44B6-A891-32D4231DA4D4Q36104646-149208E0-0069-4818-9484-77A0E8F58D8FQ36119076-A43494B3-8210-4A98-8F5D-DDC9DE01C943Q36192761-42BC8090-6EB0-4A48-86AE-6ABC1C6EDCD6Q36380971-755CE8BA-E6E3-45F8-ABE6-980FCCAD31F6Q36579838-80D7A968-7979-4247-A056-6B500F61C07FQ36951441-DD80EDFB-CC25-4AAE-95A1-B7E25A7E3D79Q37251703-B35EAF53-6D2B-49BA-9E0F-6B28440045DDQ37709366-DAF2E4A0-8F99-427B-BEFE-0A06F57F330CQ38092146-60427359-B4B9-4918-9F3F-DC89D701EAD4Q38109033-0A722C1A-0947-42BE-834E-4F27F5DD4A5CQ38167048-70618397-C8EA-492F-AB44-276C4E566914Q38261246-8BC7CBF5-C7D2-443E-8657-768A0B35FF14Q38528612-9A3CB8FE-4298-4174-9FAC-03BF086B944DQ38603386-F484DA87-DC77-47E4-A36E-CE6D7C110B43Q38650020-050576EB-0C32-4EC5-83CC-1704B17CFACFQ38694187-920D92AB-CB07-40D3-8823-8E23AD7C11FFQ40070335-3D2D93EA-F30B-4C40-B594-D6E8875B7367Q40261255-F79A1EE4-0056-486F-B0AE-7AA81281A761Q43169747-A9B5AFD6-3BD8-4FC4-9336-81CD41D830ECQ44514093-B6105EDC-B028-4849-8DF3-AB37220A58C7Q45143020-C54B8864-AB27-4B5C-95D2-E374F9F7EF10Q47186805-CB39AF50-CE30-4D72-9501-41E1D67A5CB1Q48232141-50D9D80C-275B-472B-AE5E-92C0DD741786Q48412414-C69B778E-46D4-4272-872C-69A7932DD9D2Q50146983-C604EC99-EA9B-4735-AEC1-B0D5B263F5CAQ50319654-2EF73CC9-68F0-4ADD-806C-97860CB6F400Q52343836-62E451C4-7FBA-4CAE-9A99-2DD89A2BB362Q53278031-0F8E9E2F-B354-4672-81CF-CE0FB452E4F5
P2860
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@ast
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@en
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@nl
type
label
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@ast
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@en
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@nl
prefLabel
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@ast
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@en
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
Brittany U Burda
Haley K Holmer
Lauren A Ogden
Susan L Norris
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0025153
P407
P577
2011-10-19T00:00:00Z