Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
about
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?Clostridium difficile Infection and Fecal Microbiota Transplant.Molecular diagnosis of diarrhea: current status and future potentialDefining the causes of diarrhea: novel approaches.Hospital epidemiology and infection control in acute-care settings.New concepts in diagnostics for infectious diarrhea.Extraction and sensitive detection of toxins A and B from the human pathogen Clostridium difficile in 40 seconds using microwave-accelerated metal-enhanced fluorescence.Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis.Current status of Clostridium difficile infection epidemiologyComparison of strain typing results for Clostridium difficile isolates from North America.Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimensIndeterminate tcdB using a Clostridium difficile PCR assay: a retrospective cohort studyLaboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.Differential immunodetection of toxin B from highly virulent Clostridium difficile BI/NAP-1/027.Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Clostridium difficile infection in patients with discordant diagnostic test resultsAntimicrobial-resistant strains of Clostridium difficile from North America.Development and Validation of Digital Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Ultrasensitive Detection and Quantification of Clostridium difficile Toxins in StoolFalse Negative Results in Clostridium difficile Testing.Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a real-time PCR for Clostridium difficile toxin A and B genes.Outcomes in patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxins.Comparison of a frozen human foreskin fibroblast cell assay to an enzyme immunoassay and toxigenic culture for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.Evaluation of Clostridium difficile fecal load and limit of detection during a prospective comparison of two molecular tests, the illumigene C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi tests.Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity.Clostridium difficile ribotype diversity at six health care institutions in the United StatesDiagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing?Clostridium difficile in a HIV-infected cohort: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomesA low complexity rapid molecular method for detection of Clostridium difficile in stool.Economic evaluation of laboratory testing strategies for hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection.A novel subtyping assay for detection of Clostridium difficile virulence genes.Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.Clostridium difficile infection in 2010: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of CDI.Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clostridium difficile: Changing Epidemiology, Treatment and Infection Prevention Measures.Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.Molecular methods in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: an update.Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the molecular approach.Real-time cellular analysis for quantitative detection of functional Clostridium difficile toxin in stool.
P2860
Q26827536-7DE523F0-B29E-42AC-ADED-9998F5BE2FB3Q30240065-5240B7BC-073D-497B-8E7F-39AB1BFE70C7Q30422560-9E99F728-850C-4614-B97C-D11048BD2170Q30424695-DD297E0A-0800-4244-84D5-2051CA5B69C5Q30429049-233703BA-531B-4933-9345-78FD29AADD93Q30456827-494BBE02-4D45-41DA-82E5-0E9C545599A6Q34097036-2BEA15FB-D479-4199-BD91-1D215E4B504DQ34213457-9CD6E801-FC32-4A2E-A230-E1B71B9DD434Q34285444-4DF247D8-0A48-497E-A7D5-549935DF16DDQ34627447-08BC5F22-F3B3-4718-B240-1D340B9FBA7EQ34628889-E4C0BAA6-7A3B-4074-8077-D2009BADEDEEQ34832564-F9CBA52F-3672-4336-81F6-7BAF217A4216Q35035950-C8A3A404-9277-4334-968F-001819054E2AQ35139786-7E8529BB-F782-414C-8B95-7ED68B9FFE77Q35140090-155B6C51-DC77-41A7-B96D-7E8436892928Q35455312-68151595-4019-4C1E-80FA-F93C524AB4C8Q35867764-D5FC42D1-952B-479F-8295-EA02E78C3396Q36018766-4F0B6C8F-3FB8-4A0A-8F45-8092B553A2EEQ36066827-F4B0DD21-EA1C-49AE-8057-9AC53ABE96AEQ36108285-061D9927-FD98-4243-BEFB-A80E611B0788Q36162408-4E0A3115-C6A7-4CF5-9D94-F86907DFD2FEQ36395224-C2097980-11EF-4C26-9700-C7B4095E0DA3Q36476718-8A3FD0EE-9956-4413-BF61-F1308F1B57B4Q36506325-7DB1EF29-AFC8-4680-A56F-8D9E67281D0EQ36667575-D763DCC2-F982-4D4E-9D39-C07AADF69984Q37026536-11D06728-7FC8-40A9-AE62-6F5D86878B1EQ37035829-21FEA415-2DDD-4371-96E2-8250A4D92CE0Q37120875-CE932F81-A1A1-4C82-802F-2CF701F8C0E5Q37432696-34F6219D-67DE-4AF0-BC15-FDF684EEA0FBQ37452494-33DDBC8C-ECB9-40A5-AF71-065E1ACD3FE1Q37546208-629A6736-1301-4F18-869E-B60130FB03CAQ37608243-D0D25884-7429-4D1D-AB7A-C1E69A6F9EBFQ37633859-074FE01E-DC24-4A84-9F6C-EEBC19668AF9Q37835698-18708A8F-82BE-43E1-861D-B8CD4E966206Q38024184-0329BBE6-B2C7-4DB1-A11C-EAB7D888902EQ38051245-6303A93E-00AC-40E3-8441-97BD0C9A8E48Q38068605-9E289C8A-CFA4-4A0D-B88E-5253D907AD21Q38142247-C0E62193-9499-4D1C-93C4-73377699861EQ38165197-FAF3C99B-9CB0-44C5-98A4-2080A34570E8Q38197671-E9129717-146C-40C4-B510-B90D71DBF5B7
P2860
Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@ast
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@en
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@nl
type
label
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@ast
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@en
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@nl
prefLabel
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@ast
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@en
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Impact of strain type on detec ...... enzyme immunoassay approaches.
@en
P2093
Alice S Weissfeld
Andre Dascal
Christopher W Woods
David H Persing
Edith Wong
Elizabeth M Marlowe
Ellen Jo Baron
Fred C Tenover
Jim H Nomura
Joseph Whitmore
P2860
P304
P356
10.1128/JCM.00427-10
P407
P577
2010-08-11T00:00:00Z