The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
about
On going back to nature: a review of Seligman and Hager's Biological boundaries of learning1The "where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting responseAn omission procedure reorganizes the microstructure of sign-tracking while preserving incentive salience.Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission trainingTemporal distributions of responding during discrete-trial omission training in ratsDiscrimination and differentiation of response number in stimulus directed pecking of pigeonsPsychophysics of key-peck duration in the pigeon.Changeover delay effects on topographically tagged discriminative behaviorChoice as a dependent measure in autoshaping: sensitivity to frequency and duration of food presentation.The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement.Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.Autoshaping and automaintenance: a neural-network approach.Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.The cognitive architecture of anxiety-like behavioral inhibition.Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.An Analysis of Feedback from a Behavior Analytic Perspective.Algorithms for survival: a comparative perspective on emotions.Effect of varying the duration of grain presentation on automaintenanceThe effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon.Response additivity: effects of superimposed free reinforcement on a variable-interval baseline.Responding under positive and negative response contingencies in pigeons and crowsAcquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingenciesMaintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for foodTopographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.Contributions of elicitation to measures of self-control.
P2860
Q28768663-5CB17915-1C6E-48D1-A5F3-B129814FCCD8Q30501875-FA29A4C3-B62F-4BF6-962C-9EE0322C5B7BQ30727914-29E1CE68-4B88-438A-A972-875FB9DDA72BQ34266299-0D959CDB-4508-4073-9A66-D0E2A0DDE159Q34266435-A9538A78-EFD8-4A7E-8984-618578F5082BQ34266718-1196087E-FDC2-46EC-A6C3-83BF0E13D3A1Q34266731-E586E2B0-03E5-4A18-87F4-219806A0D7F1Q34267015-4BE8D369-5F47-4011-B342-AE91E829AD10Q34267022-1DACFE83-83ED-4A99-9B5F-E035AB4D13F9Q34267069-4F499293-E716-4219-8E1D-DAB92D862580Q34267383-5C53C761-9068-480B-87D8-86B169A2956BQ34267579-23F3F50E-03F4-462B-9516-F796F8373ADFQ34268068-3822A58D-FFE2-4EFA-8A5D-DF3EA3AEF837Q35888927-505D7D9F-271D-4313-9A12-622A0BDF1884Q37067331-A983E30F-404E-4F76-9F26-757565E99701Q37527348-92481F30-E29D-45CE-A81F-52D2E46D3B8FQ38582099-5EAAD00C-7599-4115-8E0E-D67D785B33B5Q38949118-0738B064-8643-4861-8A4F-A4E6D8C20DF8Q39209685-4CE86561-A64F-4384-BFCF-EF6145D74B73Q41355222-C72DCEF3-3542-4482-ADC6-4136E355573EQ41358968-6CA05764-1BBA-424A-B779-BDA2BF925DC0Q41371929-6704B482-7A2E-4A65-916A-2E2FB52E707BQ41385919-AAE5F1A7-DC8B-4C5B-A37B-349EB24592C9Q41388975-7FA40A2E-CE20-4435-8D59-7B12950D4F47Q41390990-23BE7B28-3913-43CE-A03A-44CD2DBF13B4Q41394403-8EB3B994-9AE6-4924-BB06-FA1C755CB782Q41394507-1D61BE97-9A6E-4C8B-82FF-D324856844BDQ41410109-D2518BED-AF42-40FB-BC90-CE29208528DAQ41412465-E275E147-D861-4C0A-95BB-AA745E7D5963Q41421125-DF0B809B-8575-4369-93E8-BA802E5A30F7Q41446812-DDE453A6-1AA2-47B2-A94E-D7B1510C7AD6Q41451425-1D940C4A-7336-4713-A90C-30BA2C760B71Q42012726-7B511551-59E9-4C5D-8F2C-B29DF11CDC0EQ43087217-5562464A-7469-4236-94E9-D21B50DAD787
P2860
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
description
1972 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1972 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1972 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1972年の論文
@ja
1972年論文
@yue
1972年論文
@zh-hant
1972年論文
@zh-hk
1972年論文
@zh-mo
1972年論文
@zh-tw
1972年论文
@wuu
name
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@ast
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@en
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@nl
type
label
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@ast
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@en
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@nl
prefLabel
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@ast
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@en
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance
@en
P2093
Schwartz B
Williams DR
P2860
P304
P356
10.1901/JEAB.1972.17-351
P577
1972-05-01T00:00:00Z