Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching

Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34372607

about

The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching.Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.High-risk offenders participating in court-supervised substance abuse treatment: characteristics, treatment received, and factors associated with recidivism.Developmental timing of first drug treatment and 10-year patterns of drug use.Abstinence at Successful Discharge in Publicly Funded Addiction Health Services.The effectiveness of diversion programmes for offenders using Class A drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

P2860

Q34273158-BC2B45A3-30D4-4E67-AA1B-0E0255B8283A Q34512410-542BB8E4-836D-4066-9C63-31A412F9FE9F Q35206905-6044B986-1418-4357-A8A5-A29BB311D0F3 Q36460287-4B1833C5-B3DB-4AA7-91AF-B8EC990898FF Q41646052-30E5930C-6B17-403A-8DD0-569460E0863B Q57700853-09780A67-EEE6-4FBA-80FD-EB2ED6062B4D

P2860

Comparative Effectiveness of California's Proposition 36 and Drug Court Programs Before and After Propensity Score Matching

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34372607

description

2014 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2014 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2014 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2014年の論文

@ja

2014年論文

@yue

2014年論文

@zh-hant

2014年論文

@zh-hk

2014年論文

@zh-mo

2014年論文

@zh-tw

2014年论文

@wuu

name

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@ast

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@en

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@nl

type

label

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@ast

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@en

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@nl

prefLabel

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@ast

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@en

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@nl

P1433

Q34372607-1226FD74-82AE-42D2-96E8-AA61484CC2BB

P1476

Q34372607-8A2287C2-D6D4-4AF9-A00B-C5DAF89D05E4

P2093

Q34372607-1449A9B1-5FE0-4D1E-819F-82EC3187A7E4

Q34372607-273A6954-3D88-4C15-875A-4923D80CC13F

Q34372607-5B42436C-2CEE-4D5E-B857-F1F8C390B8B3

P2860

Q34372607-06A99C0D-38FD-43B6-97E6-A24111570514

Q34372607-137840EB-918D-400E-949E-1E5CE6FBEE0C

Q34372607-19D78ABF-0C47-4864-AEB3-CAE2EE7798D1

Q34372607-25BF93D6-0BBC-4005-A309-C8A552D84F1C

Q34372607-321BB580-FE71-4810-A31C-37799994376E

Q34372607-3E28FC0B-D708-4FC5-B2FB-C92360C5B9B9

Q34372607-3E584AF6-B38F-4C5A-907A-0E4B88714C0C

Q34372607-45AA4C4E-09FF-4635-8DA0-94083400D181

Q34372607-47B75410-3DE2-44DD-8E6D-DA348C39B5A0

Q34372607-52B8A979-AB4D-45BB-9868-F382D9CAE78A

P304

Q34372607-06CA6520-9BEC-4B20-A23E-F81455020F44

P31

Q34372607-B82B74F6-3E85-4809-995F-A2B8750E75F4

P356

Q34372607-250BEF6F-42C3-40DD-8700-AEAEECFDEE87

P433

Q34372607-4107095A-6504-4868-B749-4B41F60C50BA

P478

Q34372607-E8394EFA-B181-41A2-BC6C-554D0D570DAA

P50

Q34372607-4591E451-08B9-4296-8ABB-D9002F5A49E5

P577

Q34372607-85EF59C7-B8B0-4D65-9CEA-6AE50B71733D

P5875

Q34372607-04AB7D5B-69AA-49D5-943E-CFC486067417

P698

Q34372607-EEA3E56C-0A9E-4F59-8D4F-10E12DAD4C3C

P921

Q34372607-ECBCDAF9-03A6-4B69-97EB-7807539723E4

P932

Q34372607-29A1170E-50FD-4D5B-ACA1-2BE4706F7742

P356

0011128710382342

P1433

Crime & Delinquency

P1476

Comparative Effectiveness of C ...... fter Propensity Score Matching

@en

P2093

Darren Urada

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Libo Li

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M Douglas Anglin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Cross-system data linkage for treatment outcome evaluation: lessons learned from the California Treatment Outcome Project

Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research.

Comparing the dynamic course of heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine use over 10 years.

Impact of court-mandated substance abuse treatment on clinical decision making.

Integrating substance abuse treatment and criminal justice supervision.

Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's proposition 36 drug treatment initiative

Promising practices for delivery of court-supervised substance abuse treatment: perspectives from six high-performing California counties operating Proposition 36.

A dozen years of drug treatment courts: uncovering our theoretical foundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm.

A decade of drug treatment court research.

The emergence of drug treatment courts in Australia.

P304

909-938

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1177/0011128710382342

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

60

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Elizabeth Evans

P577

2014-09-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

267744678

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

25342859

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

4203433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string