Comparative effectiveness of water infusion vs air insufflation in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparative effectiveness of water infusion vs air insufflation in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Comparative effectiveness of water infusion vs air insufflation in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34378517

about

Water infusion versus air insufflation for colonoscopy What Influences the Quality of Prevention Colonoscopy?Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of water-immersion colonoscopy.Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion for unsedated colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic constipation in China Technical interventions to increase adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy.Cool water vs warm water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized trial.Use of warm carbon dioxide insufflators does not affect intra-colonic gas temperature and has no effect on polyp detection rate during colonoscopy - a randomized controlled trial.Severity and duration of pain after colonoscopy and gastroscopy: a cohort study.Can Water Exchange Improve Patient Tolerance in Unsedated Colonoscopy A Prospective Comparative Study.

P2860

Q24187843-727FE8E4-9FB4-4EB1-AD37-5C9214DBD659 Q26825430-03F7A809-194D-4873-B197-57204A23C38B Q35692243-C8322A92-CB12-4FC8-9FD2-6C40B0DCC891 Q36606764-234D20B7-20A2-4186-8054-C45471EFF626 Q38972067-EF36EEA7-FF0F-41A6-A1C7-006CD415F000 Q40121514-77AFD06A-2C35-48DA-81E0-2CADC15B9BBB Q40952362-F1DC1D5F-BAB7-44E0-94F1-2DFFEEE53E1C Q41756334-132F8AD4-1B42-4DAD-96E6-5BB34F4783DF Q55527586-2686D990-FE34-4F97-99DF-358B41F4C413

P2860

Comparative effectiveness of water infusion vs air insufflation in colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34378517

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@ast

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@en

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@nl

type

label

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@ast

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@en

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@ast

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@en

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@nl

P1433

Q34378517-10602B5D-05B9-4622-B307-90B75C95582A

P1476

Q34378517-86E3F741-4214-40E8-B584-A38BBEE9A13D

P2093

Q34378517-2F5853B6-96DD-4C7D-A6EB-CF7EF3364483

Q34378517-57B06C24-5700-4300-B507-E09CD2029D34

P2860

Q34378517-09F422BA-8237-4FD1-8B3D-D91ED00FCD07

Q34378517-11C5B4D6-DEED-438F-BFE5-9925ADA3A3AF

Q34378517-379B261A-8648-4FB7-9EA7-DA94B4C0AF21

Q34378517-4C561896-2CAE-497D-A07B-366E4CB7121C

Q34378517-6DC86CF5-D6AB-40F5-A8E5-B17FB19319F6

Q34378517-6F767AD6-C2A0-4141-97BF-CFF75525AE7A

Q34378517-7FCB9495-C2C8-4E74-A170-8DE04873C244

Q34378517-9FB79F27-ABE0-41B4-95C8-5BFB70E1F540

Q34378517-A1D8C956-CF48-4682-B675-97D12E24C4E4

Q34378517-CC98CA2F-19C6-43F0-A5D1-FAD0C812B0CF

P304

Q34378517-66327988-C0DF-41B3-8E79-173BC095E8E7

P31

Q34378517-07070DC2-EFA8-46A8-8315-AC6F6020E9CA

Q34378517-f85ca05e-b78d-4187-b69f-afc9d9c10f00

P356

Q34378517-F050AEBD-0CF7-4C4A-BDA0-CC732F4485C5

P433

Q34378517-B2ACDB07-7636-4E07-80BD-CDE1B090F491

P478

Q34378517-D0D28F7C-3ADE-435D-93ED-84E19718DC97

P577

Q34378517-3FAB3638-2E0D-4EEC-B812-1C8DB3A91F87

P698

Q34378517-42B9FB4A-FBC9-4885-AB88-B0EF3FAFC8A3

P921

Q34378517-2F5B3320-353F-4C81-8053-5A748662B0A2

P356

J.1463-1318.2012.03194.X

P1433

Colorectal Disease

P1476

Comparative effectiveness of w ...... colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

@en

P2093

H U Bing

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

W U Jun

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Options for screening colonoscopy without sedation: a pilot study in United States veterans.

Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy.

A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air insufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation.

CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial.

A randomized, controlled trial to confirm the beneficial effects of the water method on U.S. veterans undergoing colonoscopy with the option of on-demand sedation.

Patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: a randomized trial comparing patient-controlled administration of propofol and alfentanil with physician-administered midazolam and pethidine.

A proof-of-principle, prospective, randomized, controlled trial demonstrating improved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the water method.

P304

404-409

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1463-1318.2012.03194.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

15

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-04-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

22889295

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921