A comparison of the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and TTO utility values to changes in vision and perceived visual function in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
about
Impact of Diabetic Retinopathy on Health-related Quality of Life in Iranian Diabetics.Does the type of treatment have an influence on utility values in a glaucoma population?SF-6D utility values for the better- and worse-seeing eye for health states based on the Snellen equivalent in patients with age-related macular degeneration.Impact of Treatment with Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation on Patients' Health State Utility.Assessment of quality of life in patients with visual impairments using a new visual function questionnaire: the VFQ-J11.Preference-based disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument for glaucoma: a mixed methods study protocolCost-effectiveness of eye care services in Zambia.Challenges to time trade-off utility assessment methods: when should you consider alternative approaches?Multivariable Regression Model of the EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire in Patients Seeking Outpatient Low Vision Rehabilitation.Portable electronic vision enhancement systems in comparison with optical magnifiers for near vision activities: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized crossover trial.Response to: Comment on 'Cost effectiveness of collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in the UK NHS'.Mapping the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) to EQ-5D utility scores.Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.Does blindness count? Disability weights for vision loss.Utility values for glaucoma patients in Korea.
P2860
Q33593570-A4C0C7C8-2B5F-487C-ABDC-445C90B394C7Q36052344-CE44C1E3-3B2F-4BC5-85F6-BBBD1C9940D5Q36287461-C2CD6508-D9B8-43A7-AAB1-679E2C698747Q37143758-3CF7A7FC-8E0D-42C7-A229-BA66A3B0EFDDQ37337940-242F2D82-2157-429B-96D9-65180A5FC406Q37454711-D514C975-EDE8-416F-A093-841E5A4CF7F4Q37621881-C53BAC6B-6BFF-4F57-931F-8C259125BB35Q38212030-22A8710B-11AB-4748-9E97-7045E9B67553Q39043149-8B6C94DF-FAAE-4B98-BA38-A4471E30BF94Q41052868-3F1D4F7F-39E6-4A63-AF0B-9167046F4A24Q42355391-2AC40E36-A585-44C8-AEF8-B0EC2C946426Q48084967-51EFE540-1A4F-4F53-A2CD-40145C7D7F2EQ48085550-CEC36A4B-4B4F-4F12-A190-876DDA1BF4D9Q53988214-C3CE2722-A27D-4736-A6D9-CFEB81A2D811Q55314509-6A7B8518-800E-40B9-B82E-2F4BF9872C01
P2860
A comparison of the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and TTO utility values to changes in vision and perceived visual function in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@ast
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@en
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@ast
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@en
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@ast
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@en
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... h primary open-angle glaucoma.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
A comparison of the sensitivit ...... th primary open-angle glaucoma
@en
P2093
Fiammetta Maria Bozzani
Hannah Kuper
Yasmene Alavi
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1471-2415-12-43
P577
2012-08-21T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1001803070