Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
about
Bicompartmental knee arthroplastyStudy of surgical indication for knee arthroplasty by cartilage analysis in three compartments using data from Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI)Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee jointThe clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.Onlay tibial implants appear to provide superior clinical results in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Two Year Follow-up of the Preservation Unicompartmental Knee Implant.Innovations in total knee replacement: new trends in operative treatment and changes in peri-operative management.Mid-term results of oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplastyFixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis.High degree of accuracy of a novel image-free handheld robot for unicondylar knee arthroplasty in a cadaveric study.Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a lateral parapatellar approach has high early survivorshipNo long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplastyMetal backed fixed-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties using minimal invasive surgery: a promising outcome analysis of 132 cases.An Analysis of Risk Factors for Short-Term Complication Rates and Increased Length of Stay Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.Is the medial wall of the intercondylar notch useful for tibial rotational reference in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?Correction of coronal alignment correlates with reconstruction of joint height in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched paired study.Proximal tibial bone density is preserved after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Long-term results with a lateral unicondylar replacement.Mid-term results of Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee replacement for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision.Does knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis improve survival? The jury is still out.Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty?Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional techniqueScientific evidence for the use of modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Common causes of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a single-centre analysis of four hundred and seventy one cases.Lateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA): contemporary indications, surgical technique, and resultsIs isolated insert exchange a valuable choice for polyethylene wear in metal-backed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for tricompartment osteoarthritis in octogenarians.Midterm results after unicompartmental knee replacement with all-polyethylene tibial component: a single surgeon experience.The influence of the femoral force application point on tibial cementing pressure in cemented UKA: an experimental study.[Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].Minimum 10-year follow-up results of ALPINA cementless hydroxyapatite-coated anatomic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Influence of the anterior notch in mobile-bearing UKA on patellofemoral radiotracer uptake and clinical outcome.The influence of different sets of surgical instrumentation in Oxford UKA on bearing size and component position.Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?What Percentage of Patients is a Candidate for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement at a Chinese Arthroplasty Center?Glycosaminoglycan Content of the Lateral Compartment Cartilage in Knees Conforming to the Indications for Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
P2860
Q26768164-8974C821-1DB8-43DF-A507-6FBCD2F05B94Q30651618-8957F660-8DDE-4A1A-9462-85977763AB4FQ33805457-F9A42032-3BF9-486A-8F22-C9D9BA60A6B0Q33990056-BB4BB895-6A50-4E82-B89E-BAE62AC577D1Q35126392-F08B98A9-3D31-4256-BF58-5E32E9B48D8EQ35134592-65B836E5-64B1-415A-B1A7-40633DBD9E67Q35149161-64339A82-C63E-408E-9E72-A42A75BFF704Q35182304-113A53BE-21EB-4E3A-96FC-1B3D46438948Q35193661-D738CADE-B27D-4866-B155-BA2138CA8FADQ35334869-6CE116B9-251E-4ABF-99C2-8C04B9C76906Q35613727-0280CB10-7B75-4105-9BD0-2AA1C0154FCDQ35613850-9F37DFAC-436C-47FF-BB5D-85457123F953Q35728782-66638272-AF9B-48C7-8E29-29132287A5B1Q35783236-C90418A0-957E-4E9B-B26A-3206B41C1D21Q35802814-B786899A-98C2-4114-B98B-E3965A46423DQ36353688-4D27C194-CDAF-4432-8946-2BE1A45E93D3Q36484826-36D6F1EE-D274-4C7C-A8E0-1454AB4D303CQ36495871-8E1D92D3-F561-4599-9DE8-B26259D1497EQ36732290-82144626-C270-4D16-A0E6-9FDEEEA19910Q36931285-BF77DCA7-B709-4CF8-82C4-81D3ED36D718Q37207878-310DBB93-8C58-4DEC-94FB-CB98F171BCDDQ37381188-CBA262F7-1D29-40AD-B311-2A247051FC66Q37420984-33B23E31-8425-41F2-BDE5-F1C4E86825DDQ37483456-91BBAD2A-0C4D-4028-8407-3F9D15E31768Q37582954-32429F88-EF7F-4D19-AC00-82AC4A2F2E2EQ37705360-0B3065B8-F573-4C82-BFD5-764ED1548FE4Q37720103-D4D94684-520D-402D-BF7C-4D373B6F0E91Q38171310-18886651-791C-4384-8E38-DC72ED42EEE9Q39108327-1E767E23-24CB-40DC-BD5E-EF094EC53DFEQ39296975-2E15BB41-1A46-4DE4-BFBC-418BDB3BF19EQ39575593-2BB17F44-DDE6-4C19-ACE4-2270AB38739CQ40048620-1306D9F0-482D-4CB0-BC97-746F90F0E78DQ41744513-CA43F1D8-4F73-4481-B4D9-E8233A96D87CQ46427754-209B4EC3-0399-4B3F-9116-5BCA444A2376Q47107933-36BDC977-E8BB-4A37-958B-0AA600820EDCQ47218323-7E3859C4-7F94-45B5-89F2-4AAFC2FCC50CQ48100736-2CEB0C7A-B759-4A75-8827-50BB33F8F479Q49874544-1C1703A2-950E-405D-90B5-BAFC9D30139DQ50038031-9BBCECA8-1786-4752-8022-76A4AF088B47Q51696198-EF0E0E8A-FB17-4658-AD1D-23568DC5E8A8
P2860
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005 թուականի Մայիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2005 թվականի մայիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
name
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@ast
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@en
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@nl
type
label
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@ast
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@en
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@nl
prefLabel
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@ast
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@en
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up
@en
P2093
Aaron G Rosenberg
Craig J Della Valle
Jorge O Galante
Mitchell B Sheinkop
Richard A Berger
P304
P356
10.2106/JBJS.C.00568
P407
P577
2005-05-01T00:00:00Z