Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
about
Thoracoscopic approach to lobectomy for lung cancer does not compromise oncologic efficacy.Surgical strategies in the therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.Surgical treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis: is video-assisted thoracic surgery "better" than thoracotomy?On the article "prospective study of quality of life after lung cancer resection".
P2860
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
description
2009 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2009 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2009 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2009年の論文
@ja
2009年論文
@yue
2009年論文
@zh-hant
2009年論文
@zh-hk
2009年論文
@zh-mo
2009年論文
@zh-tw
2009年论文
@wuu
name
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@ast
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@en
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@nl
type
label
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@ast
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@en
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@nl
prefLabel
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@ast
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@en
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy debate: the pro argument.
@en
P2093
Frank Detterbeck
P2860
P356
10.3205/TSS000018
P577
2009-08-03T00:00:00Z