Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34537423

about

Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology Robotic single-site supracervical hysterectomy with manual morcellation: Preliminary experience Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.Robotic liver resection for malignancy: Current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications.Introduction of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: impact on complications, costs and oncologic outcome.Clinical comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy procedures for endometrial cancer patients.Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial.Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Authors' reply: Economic evaluation of robot-assisted hysterectomy: a cost-minimisation analysis.Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.Effects of transversus abdominis plane blocks after hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

P2860

Q24187376-1E2452BE-5D35-43AB-8D30-8FB993AB8B50 Q33695946-F23461CC-7E67-4C18-88DA-05017137B940 Q33941572-F5CB9510-B074-4212-B4C1-E170ADA8A430 Q34259038-21FD9A5B-1161-48B8-85FF-A5E7DF1426BC Q35745679-06A61D53-D386-4367-9DE8-0E73B62DF977 Q38210296-0E8D5AB9-11D9-4934-BD42-4DA93628DD10 Q38539586-6A50F2D4-A047-439B-A38A-032BF7F96A8B Q38967676-3E7ED239-65EE-46BE-A4BB-EB72AC57F528 Q38998348-89D6D189-49FF-4734-A6C6-30F5DF4370C8 Q43599438-1ED8CA95-FE6D-445D-B316-572777E39C26 Q47695904-41FEE780-8D0A-40AF-9FE1-A931A524BC40 Q48184410-4C0CA934-494C-4899-A3CD-25A30BCDE7B8 Q50988804-CFF63D13-64FB-4C5D-9E12-0C9121BD06BB Q55261134-68124520-1D68-4184-BE59-94A6A2274327 Q58698697-8F28182F-9F08-48C5-92A1-662412A4DED9

P2860

Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34537423

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@ast

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

type

label

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@ast

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@ast

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@en

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... atic review and meta-analysis.

@nl

P1433

Q34537423-EBDED816-1D86-4236-B2CB-343E72C6F74A

P1476

Q34537423-35FF5688-DC28-4E1C-9137-8FB3123369CC

P2093

Q34537423-27C6BF5F-59F5-42F8-9A0D-16D79EDB0FEC

Q34537423-311AE699-9FF8-4B46-8E07-EB3226C0A815

Q34537423-386E7140-05A2-4881-8E9A-6E2C91E9C85E

Q34537423-5C2B2540-425D-469C-B754-21CD7B91BE6A

Q34537423-A617E763-8A16-4CDD-A727-550FECD9B14D

Q34537423-B3441BB4-7336-42FB-AB3F-2596039C7E02

Q34537423-E606638B-4241-443C-9861-939D9B62C57C

P2860

Q34537423-004C82D5-8CC4-4085-9045-AC66D2843CFD

Q34537423-03BDE01E-A643-4003-AF1E-BEFC730FBE04

Q34537423-0DDCC9CD-BCA1-4659-8292-59768207C763

Q34537423-0E456DEC-6412-4437-82EE-7E9B479FC936

Q34537423-191EBA2B-1873-430F-AE14-BDA33DCD58A8

Q34537423-1CBDF1FA-2995-41BD-BCDC-65BB27A160EF

Q34537423-1F22301E-72AD-47A6-AFBB-1874D5EC0E62

Q34537423-2374715B-9BBD-45EE-8112-87D859DCE2FB

Q34537423-29592087-AF72-4668-91FE-7C1174175FE0

Q34537423-2B21F2A2-3FAE-4B5A-8374-6FD3B37451B0

P2888

Q34537423-2C928E38-9D22-44FE-9421-D4EFB0C94799

P304

Q34537423-ED962CB6-0AE8-4DFB-99AD-4EA15DAB3650

P31

Q34537423-6EE866E4-E889-44AD-92E1-659FED77741B

Q34537423-b61b3fef-57c0-493c-92fb-a1c070d7738b

P356

Q34537423-3D324E01-17A9-40B2-BA1D-8121D76C69A5

P433

Q34537423-1B135568-5461-4670-A468-5DAF8895A9C1

P478

Q34537423-BE2E3EBF-74DA-425B-86C3-F7647A086B09

P50

Q34537423-38222C4B-653B-4E11-9933-84587589F966

P577

Q34537423-2FB7D861-4B17-4471-B596-105FD257EA7D

P5875

Q34537423-ABB17821-1A33-4AB7-B260-B681C1833EA7

P6179

Q34537423-1781EB0A-8C43-413A-87B0-78303EF95866

P698

Q34537423-4F00F7CD-FF72-40DA-9542-436A87961F96

P921

Q34537423-68591A85-EFD4-4EA7-B037-295C594B49EC

P356

S00404-012-2681-Z

P1433

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

P1476

Robot-assisted hysterectomy co ...... matic review and meta-analysis

@en

P2093

Barry A O'Reilly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Conor Teljeur

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Martin Flattery

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matt Hewitt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michelle O'Neill

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Máirín Ryan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Orfhlaith E O'Sullivan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.

From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve

Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Rate of vaginal cuff separation following laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy

Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.

Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.

P2888

s00404-012-2681-z

P304

907-918

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00404-012-2681-Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

287

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Patrick S. Moran

P577

2013-01-05T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

234069628

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1035758111

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23291924

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921