Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34540030
Lurasidone in the Treatment of Bipolar Depression: Systematic Review of Systematic ReviewsNon-surgical interventions for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an overview of systematic reviews.Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopaedic treatment for class III malocclusion: Overview of systematic reviews.Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.An Overview of Systematic Reviews on Prognostic Factors in Neck Pain: Results from the International Collaboration on Neck Pain (ICON) Project.Are current scoliosis school screening recommendations evidence-based and up to date? A best evidence synthesis umbrella review.Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity.A Neuropsychologist's Guide To Undertaking a Systematic Review for Publication: Making the most of PRISMA Guidelines.Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations for Neurovascular Disorders Are Not Based on High-Quality Systematic Reviews.Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewersMethodological quality of systematic reviews referenced in clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of opioid use disorder.Limitations of A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and suggestions for improvement.Interventions to Reduce Adult Nursing Turnover: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.The determinants and consequences of adult nursing staff turnover: a systematic review of systematic reviews.Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship.Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
P2860

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34540030
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2012 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
name
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@ast
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@en
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@nl
type
label
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@ast
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@en
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@nl
prefLabel
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@ast
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@en
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@nl
P1433
P1476
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P407
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
Methodological quality of syst ...... on of two different approaches
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P31
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0050403
P407
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932