Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.
about
A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectivenessRelationship between clinical quality and patient experience: analysis of data from the english quality and outcomes framework and the National GP Patient Survey.A patient survey of out-of-hours care provided by Emergency Care Practitioners.Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial.Can the feedback of patient assessments, brief training, or their combination, improve the interpersonal skills of primary care physicians? A systematic review.The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristicsWomen's experiences and views about costs of seeking malaria chemoprevention and other antenatal services: a qualitative study from two districts in rural Tanzania.The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety.The influence of literacy on patient-reported experiences of diabetes self-management supportStructural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program studyDevelopment of the Chinese primary care assessment tool: data quality and measurement properties.Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study.Comparison of Primary Care Experiences in Village Clinics with Different Ownership Models in Guangdong Province, China.Quality of medical service, patient satisfaction and loyalty with a focus on interpersonal-based medical service encounters and treatment effectiveness: a cross-sectional multicenter study of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) hospitals.Health Care User Perspectives on Constructing, Contextualizing, and Co-Producing "Quality of Care"What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' prioritiesWhat determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement.Monitoring clinical quality in rare disease services--experience in England.Comparison of patients' assessments of the quality of stroke care with audit findingsIncentives to increase patient satisfaction: are we doing more harm than good?High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysisA qualitative study of patient experiences of decentralized acute healthcare services.Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices.Assessing Quality of Care and Elder Abuse in Nursing Homes via Google Reviews.Patient Satisfaction and it's Relation to Diabetic Control in a Primary Care SettingIdentifying Primary Care Pathways from Quality of Care to Outcomes and Satisfaction Using Structural Equation Modeling.Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of CareWhat happened? GPs' perceptions of consultation outcomes and a comparison with the experiences of their patients.Development and validation of the Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool.Patient involvement in health care will improve quality.Can patients assess the quality of health care?[Freiburg index of patient satisfaction: interdisciplinary validation of a new psychometric questionnaire to describe treatment-related patient satisfaction].Singing from the QOF hymn sheet: Stairway to Heaven or Mephisto Waltz?How to assess communication skills? Development of the rating scale ComOn Check.Improving the management of hypertension in Kazakhstan: implications for improving clinical practice, patient behaviours and health outcomes.Effect of nurses' work environment on patient satisfaction: A cross-sectional study of four hospitals in Japan.Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis.Patient-focused strategies
P2860
Q30532682-D1D0A021-D3F4-4433-AD6A-9D26C59C99F3Q30665875-66E441E0-A853-490D-BAFD-5267DC15B02AQ33287964-45F42B63-8A74-43B9-A45B-E82BEDA76473Q33347572-92A6154C-B769-47D3-AC70-0C26F3BE931CQ33361796-7CFBFDD8-5316-4383-84CA-83AB71DED23CQ33495749-ABFDE4D6-106B-4726-8D6A-50F2B0271C63Q33724170-E456CC1E-2E98-4B43-AD01-E372C7D3BD21Q34022265-ED5086FF-85A8-48F0-AB27-B2188D917F7EQ34157685-6B793223-42F6-47CA-B6E1-33B17090FBA6Q34474801-29AB7728-39FE-48B5-9B4A-E1F6EFAB0FE6Q34486489-5F06B3D5-EFC4-46A4-B9A5-067EF751F876Q35146054-40622D8F-3E37-4EBA-A579-1D4FAE125CEFQ35819783-8AC9527D-1D8E-4F39-BB27-2151431C1E64Q36240292-5274CB27-0D5E-48CC-945D-CFA426942434Q36325909-4FB29521-353B-4871-BABE-6632708D240AQ36433095-A9A8FD32-A270-45E7-9290-CE8CA454BE29Q36495429-05BEB897-6895-4E3E-A0CC-241464467780Q36809960-65C4E209-3BBF-4C45-8AE8-5594792646EEQ36908228-8D96C5D4-9463-4901-8035-F11FC96B08B3Q37121825-A70E9D68-15CE-400C-8E6F-16E215EFE6D0Q37207680-BC795AA0-FE5E-4EB6-96C9-10F3D43C62DEQ37225185-3F2F4506-518F-4551-8212-3787FCD16DFEQ37281921-F6D8B97C-720A-4D86-B24F-06F7DE1C6A65Q37332961-9B2CC8A9-7A7D-4310-A739-26F404C840ECQ37352059-EB98C9E4-B320-49D2-B794-A0B52C0CE860Q37636166-C73329B3-47A4-4470-8150-CF35E5A32DA2Q37733389-D6712C3F-AD2D-4F25-BD07-8F3564C62600Q38952219-C9E5A3EB-605D-4B69-BE33-E4364CF4107BQ39037919-3FB5C1E6-F158-4C2B-A542-78B8E692BDF6Q39292289-4B0A99F0-F16A-4170-91AF-964C3298E42AQ41142634-8D102CD1-D106-43AF-9A2B-F353205BAD65Q42337538-0A00E175-B2CD-404F-AF14-51F69FC0C79FQ42374989-CB429941-D465-4684-ADF4-77B11F03E0C9Q43594063-6F93A7BA-BDB8-4A37-99DD-68A37DFA6428Q46799146-04D49B20-6233-42EA-BD4A-602ABA3285BFQ47284969-D9870039-281D-48CB-8F43-D4C379E904D0Q47869510-EDD58746-2F0D-4727-A5F8-6D64F96D8D46Q50890898-07BF8955-B16E-43D8-BFD8-D6CD6EBC2886Q55416352-52F6A753-C563-4C20-996A-4F239847AB45Q57404506-388FBEA8-8099-4DBE-A7DB-F2496B2F152C
P2860
Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2006 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
name
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@ast
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@en
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@nl
type
label
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@ast
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@en
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@nl
prefLabel
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@ast
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@en
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
Patients' own assessments of q ...... f care: cross sectional study.
@en
P2093
Richard Hammersley
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.38874.499167.7C
P407
P577
2006-06-22T00:00:00Z