Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
about
Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A practical guideMusculoskeletal imaging update: current applications of advanced imaging techniques to evaluate the early and long-term complications of patients with orthopedic implants.Correlation of PUV and SUV in the extremities while using PEM as a high-resolution positron emission scannerIs imaging the extremities with PEM feasible? A novel application for a high-resolution positron emission scanner.Comparison and Combination of Dual-Energy- and Iterative-Based Metal Artefact Reduction on Hip Prosthesis and Dental Implants.Biodegradable magnesium Herbert screw - image quality and artifacts with radiography, CT and MRI.Advances in pediatric body MRIMagnetic resonance imaging features of complications following hip replacement: A pictorial reviewMetal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.Radiology of the resurfaced hip.Recognition, assessment, and treatment of non-union after surgical fixation of fractures: emphasis on 3D CT.Spinal fusion-hardware construct: Basic concepts and imaging review.Peering through the glare: using dual-energy CT to overcome the problem of metal artefacts in bone radiology.Postoperative MRI of the shoulder.CT Metal Artifact Reduction in the Spine: Can an Iterative Reconstruction Technique Improve Visualization?Using the dGEMRIC technique to evaluate cartilage health in the presence of surgical hardware at 3T: comparison of inversion recovery and saturation recovery approaches.Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software.Fat-suppressed MR Imaging of the Spine for Metal Artifact Reduction at 3T: Comparison of STIR and Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction Fat-suppressed T2-weighted Images.Advanced imaging technology in surgical innovation.Comparison of Reconstruction Algorithms for Decreasing the Exposure Dose During Digital Tomosynthesis for Arthroplasty: a Phantom Study.Accuracy of specimen-specific nonlinear finite element analysis for evaluation of radial diaphysis strength in cadaver material.Longitudinal Followup of Incidentally Detected Pseudotumors in Patients with Metal on Metal Implants: A Retrospective StudyValue and Clinical Application of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CT Scans after Orthopedic Metal Implantation.Equine ulnar fracture repair with locking compression plates can be associated with inadvertent penetration of the lateral cortex of the radius.Evaluation of metal artifacts in MVCT systems using a model based correction method.Performances of low-dose dual-energy CT in reducing artifacts from implanted metallic orthopedic devices.Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.Carbon fiber intramedullary nails reduce artifact in postoperative advanced imaging.Ankle post-traumatic osteoarthritis: a CT arthrography study in patients with bi- and trimalleolar fractures.Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation.Evaluation of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Application in Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstruction of Spinal Instrumentation: A Single Saudi Center Experience.Value of monoenergetic dual-energy CT (DECT) for artefact reduction from metallic orthopedic implants in post-mortem studies
P2860
Q28072064-EFBB7A89-4C44-4B46-874D-82FEA0F385B1Q30493681-518452E0-6BD8-40B6-B54B-30CFCC914459Q33863472-618D0B1C-E885-4157-86D5-0D218BC711F8Q33863497-C4D4A6DA-999F-4010-9A9A-BEDD74ECEBE7Q35850685-43012D2A-8736-47F9-945D-9F0A6B79C649Q36280281-E0E044DA-2FBF-409B-9C85-F8C0885E3CCDQ36422322-B0D08619-4148-490E-BACA-4594DD5258FDQ37062332-D6260D6A-2266-41FF-B409-659ACF22749AQ37479255-F063A90F-D548-4420-88FA-F84735151144Q37861603-AB4BC4B8-AC0B-4163-AB0A-807835133159Q37967423-8DEDEC9F-6135-428E-8A67-CE1FEB6193AEQ38023857-F033ED1B-488C-436B-B16F-C2A9E8B8FEADQ38179301-75F128E0-01CD-4B82-8F67-83FCC18F5B13Q38206161-60A1027B-9EE4-4AA3-BCE8-62CCE44B4B87Q38385021-AB655126-E499-4680-A327-ED1BF7C00755Q38451467-7AEFF5DE-3271-401F-AB0F-50A42CE8DA88Q38460268-B828DBA6-1905-4BF7-8A33-C5BBF3C12899Q38744695-78ACCA7D-7727-4A60-92B8-39A8DE1EC4ABQ39690994-DC8AA968-38DF-4E72-8142-564BFEBDB3C5Q39947795-AA277E7D-DBD5-4A9D-A1CF-37C0CF2F5A88Q40233130-E1601DFE-78B6-488C-8B1C-A857DC51D73FQ41113050-0F73A3A2-9A74-49B0-B846-A7FF4B9CC89BQ42291717-68A0B386-0AF0-424B-8FDF-E34071187C37Q45793878-D99AA456-99E8-4AD6-859A-F41B4346D6F0Q49069493-8D01383A-C37C-4C9B-8C27-347A7540CB36Q52983984-A775E68F-A3D9-4F48-B787-748D9B94C90CQ53039954-40EFE987-A2CC-4AD8-AC97-62D423C9CBF9Q53172900-C23F0764-479C-45A7-9C77-16D15D728EAAQ53194299-A7BDC166-0BDF-4862-B5C4-990B1BB89D35Q53249066-A3392C51-D8A6-4EA9-9192-57D44661C733Q53695743-267B96DD-CBC9-4F70-81B4-EBCE3C7A15EDQ58000348-ADE88C0F-B087-49A1-A6F7-F165F07CF8C7
P2860
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@ast
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@en
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@nl
type
label
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@ast
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@en
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@nl
prefLabel
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@ast
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@en
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.
@nl
P356
P1476
Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient
@en
P2093
Kenneth A Buckwalter
P356
10.1055/S-2002-23160
P577
2002-03-01T00:00:00Z