Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
about
Coexisting hybrid malignancy in a solitary sporadic solid benign renal mass: implications for treating patients following renal biopsy.Omental Nodular Deposits of Recurrent Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Seen on FDG-PET/CT.Pathological characteristics and radiographic correlates of complex renal cystsRelating prognosis in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma to the chromophobe tumor grading system.Diagnostic approach to eosinophilic renal neoplasmsOverexpression of IL-32 is a novel prognostic factor in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinomaRenal cell carcinoma: risk assessment and prognostic factors for newly diagnosed patients.MCM - 2 and Ki - 67 as proliferation markers in renal cell carcinoma: A quantitative and semi - quantitative analysis.2009 update on the classification of renal epithelial tumors in adults.Advances and controversies in grading and staging of renal cell carcinoma.Multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI: single-slice versus volumetric quantification of tumor enhancement for the assessment of renal clear-cell carcinoma fuhrman grade.Grading of urologic tumors: is it still useful?Percutaneous renal tumour biopsy.Outcomes of curative nephrectomy against renal cell carcinoma based on a central pathological review of 914 specimens from the era of cytokine treatment.Gleason and Fuhrman no longer make the grade.Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Validation of WHO/ISUP grading.[The WHO/ISUP grading system for renal carcinoma].A prospective risk-stratified follow-up programme for radically treated renal cell carcinoma patients: evaluation after eight years of clinical use.Renal cell carcinoma histological subtype distribution differs by age, gender, and tumor size in coastal Chinese patients.Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 53 cases.Fuhrman grade [corrected] has no added value in prediction of mortality after partial or [corrected] radical nephrectomy for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma patients.The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases.Prognostic Value of Clinical and Pathological Features in Chinese Patients with Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 10-Year Single-Center Study.Correlation of CT imaging features and tumor size with Fuhrman grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Clinical behavior of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is less aggressive than that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, independent of Fuhrman grade or tumor size.Characterization of Fibromuscular Pseudocapsule in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Does the Fuhrman or World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Grading System Apply to the Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma?: A 10-Year Single-Center Study.Correlation between CT perfusion parameters and Fuhrman grade in pTlb renal cell carcinoma.The ISUP system of staging, grading and classification of renal cell neoplasia.
P2860
Q33851709-88B42D4F-BF34-489B-9B4C-AF5B87637AEDQ34376790-83B30C89-B019-43EF-8CFE-A68DEA5CCF84Q35111920-8F738DD1-CD8F-4EF2-9D6C-DE46A171FEACQ35150993-995EB559-9560-4345-9862-A7F586011EC3Q35155653-C315C8B4-79A7-441F-A1DF-0665F845EA7FQ35995303-515859A4-C2E3-4A14-A034-393B5AFA4256Q37321213-25E062B8-E595-4834-8D70-951DFE496869Q37426976-D7FC96F6-51E8-4B70-9D6F-0FE6D27525F8Q37488430-79F94486-F751-40BD-A6C2-30C2D550EEC6Q37507522-B07A4F0D-C1C1-4762-93DF-E1FCABE96665Q37708077-865E6ADC-C1CD-4943-95BB-125F36680210Q37756385-D3AAC029-4B51-45F4-B678-0C4D60C5B1A1Q38231652-C8488E7A-63DD-44E6-8F13-E9759C6BFC7DQ38485628-53D8C9AB-52D8-4BA0-A949-32D86CC5FEADQ38565256-89E1E426-01F5-4FBF-B475-4CD88E567F06Q38674090-C6AC7CFD-1426-4FF0-8488-95F5496A985DQ40714570-36AC2286-9C67-41ED-8740-96E426F36674Q40883396-1627E553-B5EF-4DC3-B1A5-FE1375C95BD7Q42700879-F3047C1B-C5A1-40AE-8C4A-B0CF4CEEFE8CQ44091918-5CFCF175-1ADA-46DD-B529-CF13595D69D5Q44461958-87C72E83-8111-4A46-BC34-FB852E60F5F0Q45208965-9F602F7E-9DED-4103-B6D7-7F107912AF8EQ47119931-A6C5C7D4-3D6D-487A-AB4B-518621C512DCQ47300583-DC542B3F-22BD-4FAF-AA00-260C3BF43054Q47439191-DEF84919-F999-41DF-9D88-42D777C208B2Q49120958-806A50AF-3A4B-4F72-A4BE-B375B9B6C6BEQ52640027-2522B428-0678-4B8B-963D-D4B3F38B1642Q52957587-72B2A268-FDA3-4DF4-8EA5-9642A5A58378Q53097603-685BA039-A4C4-4B28-AAD2-943B11E3EFA5
P2860
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@ast
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@en
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@nl
type
label
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@ast
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@en
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@nl
prefLabel
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@ast
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@en
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
@en
P2093
Brett Delahunt
Guido Martignoni
John N Eble
Margaret R E McCredie
Peter B Bethwaite
T William Jordan
P304
P356
10.1097/01.PAS.0000249446.28713.53
P407
P577
2007-06-01T00:00:00Z