The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34658377

about

The correct episiotomy: does it exist? A cross-sectional survey of four public Israeli hospitals and review of the literature.Mode of birth and medical interventions among women at low risk of complications: A cross-national comparison of birth settings in England and the Netherlands.Variations in childbirth interventions in high-income countries: protocol for a multinational cross-sectional study.No episiotomy versus selective lateral/mediolateral episiotomy (EPITRIAL): an interim analysis.Cutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we?Creating an Optimality Index - Netherlands: a validation study.

P2860

Q38400047-57C576DA-FF97-4DF7-B815-749A0901DD4D Q38657570-55999D81-FFC4-4318-ABA1-52D9F72997B2 Q47546306-AF545082-AA01-47F4-B438-E0BFD0421506 Q48317842-160A1B6B-ACCF-4287-BC75-EA07697C600C Q51273401-B33B227F-A792-4273-8CF8-D05E0030CD51 Q55027992-499513F0-2E03-4C9D-A6BE-13C826B5FC1C

P2860

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q34658377

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@ast

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@en

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@nl

type

label

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@ast

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@en

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@ast

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@en

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@nl

P1433

Q34658377-85335CA1-D74D-4733-9CDD-6CF8D92B8ABE

P1476

Q34658377-9D671823-4A4B-459E-A828-BD0D2AA45ECE

P2093

Q34658377-4A769B6E-8C98-49B8-BE75-F5537D74E67A

Q34658377-4E0E9B78-58EE-4DD5-B130-B43E9DAF62CC

Q34658377-7C705E0F-8EBC-4A2D-B197-D05488DBDC97

Q34658377-829EF9A2-A848-4D9F-A535-B4FF1EA0EBD5

Q34658377-B4795DD1-5349-439D-9F9C-7BC03FDA9690

Q34658377-CC4E5AFA-4022-4F86-A1CA-161FA285C4BD

Q34658377-DBB33194-0711-44EC-86D2-BE605BA5AAC8

P2860

Q34658377-08657F3C-9040-471C-8E70-159F0681C542

Q34658377-0C70B5D8-77FD-403B-A207-563C14803FBB

Q34658377-0F564561-BAED-40B5-97F9-78EE66B3FF6A

Q34658377-2D690FC2-9DB4-4333-AF7B-37D401BBDE26

Q34658377-33BAA27E-332D-431A-9C5E-996B3F5CDFB0

Q34658377-3D3088F9-969F-46E1-B6C9-F9E17E8C5FF6

Q34658377-5A754E7D-A4E3-4AF5-A031-A390327EBD0F

Q34658377-63E02C31-DB38-469D-9655-E686A9434F0A

Q34658377-65254B47-4566-431F-A59E-4E1D584FD392

Q34658377-67C94082-BF20-47BA-8561-25830E9129E8

P304

Q34658377-97BA3317-11B3-4CB1-B6F3-4B9012B9D08B

P31

Q34658377-5B7CAC5B-2C27-40B3-B53E-8BEEFD1D06FF

P356

Q34658377-F4B58474-812B-4313-B3EE-EEB881222B2C

P433

Q34658377-32AEEEF7-575E-4496-B6AA-0587FCB58428

P478

Q34658377-A27335B3-A635-4BAB-AACE-E3860182F267

P577

Q34658377-2F297C0C-E5FC-4503-A54B-542E6D75B72C

P5875

Q34658377-1A0B7B58-D3EF-494D-B229-A8D3839818CC

P698

Q34658377-CCB5D6C8-5D3C-4AC6-B6D9-DD30D94C6B33

P921

Q34658377-5205C63B-1A9D-4AB5-8416-5F9097B12D3D

P356

P1433

P1476

The use of episiotomy in a low-risk population in the Netherlands: a secondary analysis.

@en

P2093

A E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A L M Lagro-Janssen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

A de Jonge

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

C C Geerts

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M Prins

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

M T van Diem

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

T Klomp

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review.

The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants.

Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Episiotomy use in the United States, 1979-1997.

Evaluation of primary care midwifery in The Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER).

Influence of training in the use and generation of evidence on episiotomy practice and perineal trauma.

Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review.

The role of episiotomy in current obstetric practice.

Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.

Is it possible to predict or prevent third degree tears?

P304

247-255

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/BIRT.12060

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

40

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

259350981

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

24344705

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921