about
My 21 years with the Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, with observations on editors, editorial boards, authors and reviewersBioanalytical inaccuracy: a threat to the integrity and efficiency of researchClassical peer review: an empty gunEnhancing the reporting and transparency of rheumatology research: a guide to reporting guidelinesSystematic survey of the design, statistical analysis, and reporting of studies published in the 2008 volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and MetabolismIncongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papersUnjustified restrictions on letters to the editorQuality research in healthcare: are researchers getting enough statistical support?Misuse of statistical methods in 10 leading Chinese medical journals in 1998 and 2008Coagulopathy and transfusion strategies in trauma. Overwhelmed by literature, supported by weak evidenceLook back in anger - what clinical studies tell us about preclinical workReviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewerAdequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort studyReply to "Ten simple rules for getting published"Evidence-based (informed) macro practice: process and philosophy.Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: flawed trial.The use of propensity scores and observational data to estimate randomized controlled trial generalizability bias.Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency.Extracts from The Cochrane Library: Nasal saline irrigations for the symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis.Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact medical journals.The future of environmental DNA in ecology.To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of self-help interventions in tinnitus.How I review an original scientific article.What do letters to the editor publish about randomized controlled trials? A cross-sectional study.From Research to Practice: Which Research Strategy Contributes More to Clinical Excellence? Comparing High-Volume versus High-Quality Biomedical Research.Poor quality in the reporting and use of statistical methods in public health - the case of unemployment and health.Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysisApplication of biostatistics in research by teaching faculty and final-year postgraduate students in colleges of modern medicine: A cross-sectional study.Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review.On improving research methodology in clinical trials.No short-cut in assessing trial quality: a case studySuccess at publishing in biomedical journals: hints from a journal editor.Reporting of health promotion research: addressing the quality gaps in iran.Introduction to the special issue on improving neuropsychological research through use of reporting guidelines.Overoptimism in the interpretation of statistics: the ethical role of statistical reviewers in medical journals.The statistical reporting quality of articles published in 2010 in five dental journals.A retrospective analysis of reported errata in five leading medical journals in 2012
P2860
Q24282599-511989D8-EAA0-4C8A-AB2D-5E20B8266D9FQ24282601-CF959698-E6DF-4425-8213-32935D39D517Q24288896-2668CC75-C2D3-4225-B32F-F3D62D58AAF9Q24288897-73D4849B-4BDD-4BA7-9E56-B4F30FB80CACQ24289348-0264990D-08C4-4182-AECC-EAEB894774D5Q24799771-21538537-7518-4C95-B3D0-05D6494DDC7EQ24810061-2002F0D3-BF92-4FF3-AC83-CDB680017C0FQ25257164-D8AC7497-8810-44BD-8D6F-BBBC218E1473Q27026897-E650B12B-4C6D-4690-B264-330DAD1E154BQ28082573-5F2C6EF1-20E6-4950-9858-AF6BC78BDE3FQ28677000-8E908A82-81BC-41BB-BD71-E51B36F3EF3AQ28703872-BDFA4A8A-C5E1-4284-8D79-7F5106E79198Q28749806-6A93F0B9-DEE2-4339-9F6A-C25BF408F65DQ28974719-B96E6801-F084-477B-894C-E3B2B6989CBAQ30373562-57EF43F6-9EB7-43BC-A99F-0582E0094E59Q30504139-E37B3B92-3C70-467E-A8B8-AEE2F963639EQ30611719-3DA49509-CDE5-4C7D-A90F-1A139975682CQ30830681-F2886504-AC91-4498-83E3-DB33F3481E7EQ33256120-31A7BF43-680F-459A-A622-B1C8B147CE57Q33300828-CB6C999E-6385-4AA8-A779-7D9E711B7B00Q33312477-447FD827-6BE3-440F-91E7-BA89338853E1Q33997882-36C124A1-58AD-467F-875A-621424A6E1F3Q34225612-0DA2CA88-00FD-4C60-A729-21D05F0A8529Q34309006-EAF28A2F-04B0-4D4E-941E-D8833EBC71BAQ34777033-0FB664FD-5A8C-4A88-91C1-576F1774069FQ34962898-FD9E6966-F767-4977-B246-C182BA272B8EQ35017203-1D6A5564-BC35-4636-89B3-5C0FD756E247Q35672862-C9FEDA2B-AC61-4EF1-B82B-5635DB4E22F4Q36281501-12F4D630-44FD-4EBF-A6B1-4A863D1D17B6Q36420861-1B8989BD-6739-4FD8-BFA3-95336D516B17Q36855865-38726F25-BCA2-4176-B71B-E5005882B92EQ36895960-A72A90D3-77CD-40E0-9063-137AE68317E2Q36966428-1C28FAD9-14CF-4E84-9AFB-B770EC9EF4F5Q37364134-D28E156B-44C1-4C80-9B85-37E863D74D11Q37405708-6C03545E-4412-4489-B4E3-1E001EF57C81Q37658967-358E50BC-B9EA-4556-B24E-48BD77EF9010Q38226779-E82FAFC5-9815-4612-92D5-580FC290D2F9Q38257409-4B8E0177-8334-4EAE-A04E-753C8B4038D9Q38265397-FC3B941D-9495-4695-B1F4-501481B5EE14Q38272473-AD09188D-D67B-4704-8E3E-251C4D535C7B
P2860
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@ast
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@en
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@nl
type
label
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@ast
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@en
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@nl
prefLabel
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@ast
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@en
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@nl
P356
P1476
Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?
@en
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.287.21.2765
P407
P577
2002-06-01T00:00:00Z