Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
about
Stroke and anticoagulation in heart failure without atrial fibrillation: from risk to opportunity.Predictable and SuStainable Implementation of National Cardiovascular Registries (PASSION) infrastructure: A think tank report from Medical Device Epidemiological Network Initiative (MDEpiNet)Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.Getting (Along) With the Guidelines: Reconciling Patient Autonomy and Quality Improvement Through Shared Decision Making.Clinical Relevance of Rehospitalizations for Unstable Angina and Unplanned Revascularization Following Acute Myocardial InfarctionWeighted win loss approach for analyzing prioritized outcomes.Beyond Composite Endpoints Analysis: Semicompeting Risks as an Underutilized Framework for Cancer Research.Global Outcome in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Health Status Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction After Rehospitalization.Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials in Type 2 Diabetes: Where Do We Go From Here? Reflections From a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum.Quantifying the relative importance to patients of avoiding symptoms and outcomes of heart failure.Blood pressure dynamics during exercise rehabilitation in heart failure patients.The effect of different combinations of vascular, dependency and cognitive endpoints on the sample size required to detect a treatment effect in trials of treatments to improve outcome after lacunar and non-lacunar ischaemic strokeUnderstanding Neurologic Complications Following TAVR
P2860
Q35554746-BFFE0F03-C13C-4A98-A724-C694CD760FFDQ36407121-2315DA51-2FDC-4ED7-83DA-274E6C4355A3Q36837610-8E220D92-7E45-4447-A638-2B4FFB1B26F9Q37036719-AAA30AC1-C4DE-4DCB-B5E1-50BA8AE04FE4Q37240339-ECEC9000-C694-4B7E-A5A8-32CE4B58C90DQ38875938-5084900F-ECDE-4D61-A0C4-A74B956221C1Q39628955-F9AB75D7-97DD-4EF0-9242-D4F02D193270Q40349834-35616AB2-6D3A-4031-90C2-2281D2511961Q47634232-D34FA63C-7B06-4F09-A5B5-205971D22CBBQ47771118-097EDA8D-9C9E-4564-9F40-C6D61A9A2B60Q47834948-8869914E-B96B-4BD0-8EB9-1D729A72F97EQ47867529-B1B193F4-C585-4853-A58A-1F0FE851D80FQ57305057-B7B063B5-274F-4262-8960-BB7DDB0A6089Q57646814-D36CB43A-8A91-4A77-8BA0-229AABB7CE83
P2860
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@ast
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@en
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@nl
type
label
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@ast
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@en
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@nl
prefLabel
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@ast
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@en
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists.
@en
P2093
Brady B Lonergan
David J Cohen
Emily Bamberger
Joshua M Stolker
Kaushik K Jain
Paul S Chan
Philip G Jones
P2860
P304
P356
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006588
P407
P577
2014-09-08T00:00:00Z