Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35021415

about

Chlamydia and associated factors in an under 20s antenatal population.Sex and sport: chlamydia screening in rural sporting clubs Chlamydia trachomatis infection and sexual behaviour among female students attending higher education in the Republic of Ireland Distribution study of Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in symptomatic patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina: association between genotype E and neonatal conjunctivitis.Chlamydia trachomatis infection and associated risk factors in a low-income marginalized urban population in coastal Peru.Analysis of laboratory testing results collected in an enhanced chlamydia surveillance system in Australia, 2008-2010 Evaluation of sexual history-based screening of anatomic sites for chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in men having sex with men in routine practice.Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female soldiers, Israel Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection among young men and women in Spain LCR testing for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in population surveys and other screenings of low prevalence populations: coping with decreased positive predictive value.Diagnosis and treatment of presumed STIs at Mexican pharmacies: survey results from a random sample of Mexico City pharmacy attendants.Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.Modelling the healthcare costs of an opportunistic chlamydia screening programme.Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae Public health policies and management strategies for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in adolescents in Northern Italy: an observational school-based study Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women, heterosexual men and MSM visiting HIV counselling institutions in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany - should Chlamydia testing be scaled up?Prevalence and risk factors of chlamydia infection in Hong Kong: A population-based geospatial household survey and testing.Trichomonas vaginalis in selected U.S. sexually transmitted disease clinics: testing, screening, and prevalence Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling The importance of chlamydial infections in obstetrics and gynaecology: an update.One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluations Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending outpatient clinics in a large maternity hospital in Dublin, Ireland Chlamydia trachomatis recombinant MOMP encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles triggers primarily T helper 1 cellular and antibody immune responses in mice: a desirable candidate nanovaccine.Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies project A survey on the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium infections in symptomatic and asymptomatic men referring to urology clinic of labbafinejad hospital, tehran, iran.Chlamydia in gynecologic practice.Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.Cost-benefit analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in pregnant women in a high burden setting in the United States.Chlamydia screening for pregnant women aged 16-25 years attending an antenatal service: a cost-effectiveness study.HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis co-detection in young asymptomatic women from high incidence area for cervical cancer.Conjunctival infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexual partners of patients with adult inclusion conjunctivitis.Female genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: where are we heading?Large loop excision of transformation zone procedures used in the management of cytological abnormalities of the cervix.Home sampling and pooling of vaginal samples are effective tools for genetic screening of Chlamydia trachomatis among high school female students in Lithuania.Initial and repeat testing for chlamydia during pregnancy.The pattern of notification and testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Victoria, 1998-2000: an ecological analysis.

P2860

Q33319892-9B5E18DB-DC9F-4FB6-BC05-1510C8593AFA Q33452929-DE070031-1E03-4ABD-9654-06377BB4A463 Q33513729-DBDAAB6F-B610-42D5-8DFE-26E328B6EF08 Q33533970-1BC16106-7086-4CC1-A64E-B6C4CBCBB18D Q33768422-3AB31BD5-96B9-4B81-A63C-73775313CC18 Q33770629-675A70BF-16FA-4599-9288-6CA1197B1734 Q33972061-7C4D71FC-B929-4BD1-972A-D79F9140E436 Q34042322-4B9B3563-2F70-41D6-8DCD-545ABDE7D516 Q34548974-CA66DD75-D6FE-458A-9E4E-4BBCC4C4B5AC Q34966952-3789FEA3-6E32-47A9-84D3-3A29C6B43CA0 Q35530436-C38D1E71-0F63-4C63-88E8-053BF034489D Q35530565-0514116D-F42B-471A-BFDB-D0EE36F9BFF2 Q35531491-E889A642-F53E-49A9-BD8A-E29569924148 Q35531545-DBAB661C-8212-4237-9CB4-74DA56369510 Q35573013-D8E75F2D-AB79-4D54-BD0B-5AAD95049C8E Q35718943-A124FB00-6BDC-4085-92B4-E2547F9F39D9 Q35727770-10578BAB-7E68-4ECC-B4B4-7D513D3707F2 Q35929021-030DB7E2-2FA7-45E7-81D0-CBB8B0753B48 Q35939831-D002E3A2-96C6-41F1-A00C-A9C96E451135 Q36175296-2C19659D-2CD3-46AD-AB3B-767F8C867E78 Q36287488-5DFA1B50-D71E-45DA-AAE6-871C16D02908 Q36368342-E08479EB-ED9E-4920-B012-970632278904 Q36491361-635954D1-8335-4249-ADF8-756CBC848757 Q36721366-6CDC5715-485D-4EDE-959D-6E9B59FD5330 Q36878314-FA2FA368-340D-4711-9CFB-3F90AE214D7B Q36928607-ACA774B7-8E54-4ADD-926E-B201401D92C4 Q36929225-30BDFF6D-D03B-4961-B1C1-F9F57425CC80 Q37006362-F54D8DDC-C056-4FB3-AD90-D52DF45114D7 Q37204439-54BFC37F-B82E-467C-A730-15EF8DF7BA01 Q37608361-26FB1033-DA84-4DE1-B914-2296A2F3D2DD Q37614736-A1498ADD-F38F-45B4-83D4-DEBF968F9B8A Q37650849-C2E2DDEE-73DD-4832-9246-92E827810C03 Q37839299-A96DCDDF-5AA4-44DE-AA91-254CA68D0DA9 Q37843753-D5C1DAA2-EE45-4E18-AA05-F9D4C221056B Q37844703-9B2C8ABC-8FC2-4997-9BAB-22A248EC2654 Q37849297-CE6F2029-BA96-4C2B-98E4-51F641A68B1A Q37851047-B1F0C67B-E6A6-4F2D-A853-E2FB3B3CDC80 Q37859071-664D838E-235A-41F8-9C4A-B3B456308B55 Q37863462-3E35B9FA-61B9-4687-A92E-0CAFC7FDFD64 Q37867934-9B26D12F-E063-4028-A708-5495598D2F34

P2860

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35021415

description

2002 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2002 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2002 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2002年の論文

@ja

2002年論文

@yue

2002年論文

@zh-hant

2002年論文

@zh-hk

2002年論文

@zh-mo

2002年論文

@zh-tw

2002年论文

@wuu

name

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@ast

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@en

type

label

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@ast

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@en

prefLabel

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@ast

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@en

P1433

Q35021415-669D936E-1ABD-4463-8149-653271F997E1

P1476

Q35021415-1B3ADFDF-1977-45D9-A985-1F4E7980B871

P2093

Q35021415-153118A3-B260-4DE2-BB3C-E28B1C2D0407

Q35021415-56C32D18-76D6-420B-8E82-226620B4EC4A

Q35021415-5F2F6DB4-11E4-447E-9553-2D522BA4EC9C

Q35021415-759CD246-CB11-441A-A887-469EFAA3BD92

Q35021415-869607A6-7E13-4072-B848-8BDC04E1E487

Q35021415-C356BBF2-EA15-4173-9284-BDF77AE478E5

Q35021415-CD12399C-179A-482D-A285-66A99881C415

Q35021415-DA9B3EC5-6AF0-4107-B1B0-1CD36D743A36

P2860

Q35021415-0B5E1FA3-D4BF-413D-BC09-C571519C8A48

Q35021415-0FD78DAB-7AD6-4E5E-B6F8-8AECA5D2F95E

Q35021415-13DD77BA-644C-4CC6-9ED5-FF6D086B468B

Q35021415-185213F7-0AC6-4E9F-A434-8CC5A17535E0

Q35021415-26305A85-B8AB-4F03-B4C2-05059AA2F418

Q35021415-26A1EFB0-8E27-4292-9CF1-370F4F1F23F1

Q35021415-288DFDCA-3047-4E3E-AB8D-A9CEC14D320B

Q35021415-3004809D-E215-4335-BE59-474BF064B5FE

Q35021415-31F01C92-8312-4B62-9F62-BAA3B21B7994

Q35021415-5880151F-3F3D-4C3B-B7FA-2442540DA7FD

P304

Q35021415-872A825C-6F68-4CF3-9FD3-76A0C948CFAC

P31

Q35021415-15A09C97-2CD5-4EC8-AEB6-214DC5A757C7

P356

Q35021415-3889F550-52C1-4317-A68A-50F4B65EB94E

P433

Q35021415-739C58DB-3208-4EAC-817C-0087E4D0130E

P478

Q35021415-7027AA02-8584-4268-A96F-0A63CFF70608

P577

Q35021415-3255EBAE-FA10-41B6-B03A-29BEDAFCD591

P5875

Q35021415-11934CD0-B4D9-4A5B-A2AB-1BF06DBB1303

P698

Q35021415-F6A3D377-5CD3-4143-866C-61D05CCBF91F

P921

Q35021415-2D6092A6-8666-4096-A73B-587D54003CD5

P932

Q35021415-513B8E2E-0A9D-4AEB-A4CB-D4FDA32F8CA7

P356

P1433

Sexually Transmitted Infections

P1476

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies

@en

P2093

Augood C

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Honey E

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mårdh PA

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paavonen J

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Russell I

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stary A

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stray-Pedersen B

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Templeton A

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Screening for genital chlamydial infection.

Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare. Matching the art to the science.

Screening for chlamydial infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in a county in Sweden: ecological analysis

Should asymptomatic patients be tested for Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice?

How to read a paper. Papers that tell you what things cost (economic analyses).

Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in the medical literature. Are the methods being used correctly?

Comparison of two methods of screening for genital chlamydial infection in women attending in general practice: cross sectional survey

Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae.

Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach.

Control of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female army recruits: cost-effective screening and treatment in training cohorts to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease.

P304

406-412

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1136/STI.78.6.406

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

78

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2002-12-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

277545652

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

12473799

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

Chlamydia trachomatis

P932

1758346

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string