Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
about
Chlamydia and associated factors in an under 20s antenatal population.Sex and sport: chlamydia screening in rural sporting clubsChlamydia trachomatis infection and sexual behaviour among female students attending higher education in the Republic of IrelandDistribution study of Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in symptomatic patients in Buenos Aires, Argentina: association between genotype E and neonatal conjunctivitis.Chlamydia trachomatis infection and associated risk factors in a low-income marginalized urban population in coastal Peru.Analysis of laboratory testing results collected in an enhanced chlamydia surveillance system in Australia, 2008-2010Evaluation of sexual history-based screening of anatomic sites for chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in men having sex with men in routine practice.Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant womenChlamydia trachomatis infections in female soldiers, IsraelPrevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection among young men and women in SpainLCR testing for gonorrhoea and chlamydia in population surveys and other screenings of low prevalence populations: coping with decreased positive predictive value.Diagnosis and treatment of presumed STIs at Mexican pharmacies: survey results from a random sample of Mexico City pharmacy attendants.Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.Modelling the healthcare costs of an opportunistic chlamydia screening programme.Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeaePublic health policies and management strategies for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in adolescents in Northern Italy: an observational school-based studyPrevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women, heterosexual men and MSM visiting HIV counselling institutions in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany - should Chlamydia testing be scaled up?Prevalence and risk factors of chlamydia infection in Hong Kong: A population-based geospatial household survey and testing.Trichomonas vaginalis in selected U.S. sexually transmitted disease clinics: testing, screening, and prevalenceScreening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modellingThe importance of chlamydial infections in obstetrics and gynaecology: an update.One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluationsScreening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending outpatient clinics in a large maternity hospital in Dublin, IrelandChlamydia trachomatis recombinant MOMP encapsulated in PLGA nanoparticles triggers primarily T helper 1 cellular and antibody immune responses in mice: a desirable candidate nanovaccine.Healthcare and patient costs of a proactive chlamydia screening programme: the Chlamydia Screening Studies projectA survey on the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium infections in symptomatic and asymptomatic men referring to urology clinic of labbafinejad hospital, tehran, iran.Chlamydia in gynecologic practice.Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.Cost-benefit analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in pregnant women in a high burden setting in the United States.Chlamydia screening for pregnant women aged 16-25 years attending an antenatal service: a cost-effectiveness study.HPV and Chlamydia trachomatis co-detection in young asymptomatic women from high incidence area for cervical cancer.Conjunctival infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexual partners of patients with adult inclusion conjunctivitis.Female genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: where are we heading?Large loop excision of transformation zone procedures used in the management of cytological abnormalities of the cervix.Home sampling and pooling of vaginal samples are effective tools for genetic screening of Chlamydia trachomatis among high school female students in Lithuania.Initial and repeat testing for chlamydia during pregnancy.The pattern of notification and testing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Victoria, 1998-2000: an ecological analysis.
P2860
Q33319892-9B5E18DB-DC9F-4FB6-BC05-1510C8593AFAQ33452929-DE070031-1E03-4ABD-9654-06377BB4A463Q33513729-DBDAAB6F-B610-42D5-8DFE-26E328B6EF08Q33533970-1BC16106-7086-4CC1-A64E-B6C4CBCBB18DQ33768422-3AB31BD5-96B9-4B81-A63C-73775313CC18Q33770629-675A70BF-16FA-4599-9288-6CA1197B1734Q33972061-7C4D71FC-B929-4BD1-972A-D79F9140E436Q34042322-4B9B3563-2F70-41D6-8DCD-545ABDE7D516Q34548974-CA66DD75-D6FE-458A-9E4E-4BBCC4C4B5ACQ34966952-3789FEA3-6E32-47A9-84D3-3A29C6B43CA0Q35530436-C38D1E71-0F63-4C63-88E8-053BF034489DQ35530565-0514116D-F42B-471A-BFDB-D0EE36F9BFF2Q35531491-E889A642-F53E-49A9-BD8A-E29569924148Q35531545-DBAB661C-8212-4237-9CB4-74DA56369510Q35573013-D8E75F2D-AB79-4D54-BD0B-5AAD95049C8EQ35718943-A124FB00-6BDC-4085-92B4-E2547F9F39D9Q35727770-10578BAB-7E68-4ECC-B4B4-7D513D3707F2Q35929021-030DB7E2-2FA7-45E7-81D0-CBB8B0753B48Q35939831-D002E3A2-96C6-41F1-A00C-A9C96E451135Q36175296-2C19659D-2CD3-46AD-AB3B-767F8C867E78Q36287488-5DFA1B50-D71E-45DA-AAE6-871C16D02908Q36368342-E08479EB-ED9E-4920-B012-970632278904Q36491361-635954D1-8335-4249-ADF8-756CBC848757Q36721366-6CDC5715-485D-4EDE-959D-6E9B59FD5330Q36878314-FA2FA368-340D-4711-9CFB-3F90AE214D7BQ36928607-ACA774B7-8E54-4ADD-926E-B201401D92C4Q36929225-30BDFF6D-D03B-4961-B1C1-F9F57425CC80Q37006362-F54D8DDC-C056-4FB3-AD90-D52DF45114D7Q37204439-54BFC37F-B82E-467C-A730-15EF8DF7BA01Q37608361-26FB1033-DA84-4DE1-B914-2296A2F3D2DDQ37614736-A1498ADD-F38F-45B4-83D4-DEBF968F9B8AQ37650849-C2E2DDEE-73DD-4832-9246-92E827810C03Q37839299-A96DCDDF-5AA4-44DE-AA91-254CA68D0DA9Q37843753-D5C1DAA2-EE45-4E18-AA05-F9D4C221056BQ37844703-9B2C8ABC-8FC2-4997-9BAB-22A248EC2654Q37849297-CE6F2029-BA96-4C2B-98E4-51F641A68B1AQ37851047-B1F0C67B-E6A6-4F2D-A853-E2FB3B3CDC80Q37859071-664D838E-235A-41F8-9C4A-B3B456308B55Q37863462-3E35B9FA-61B9-4687-A92E-0CAFC7FDFD64Q37867934-9B26D12F-E063-4028-A708-5495598D2F34
P2860
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@ast
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@en
type
label
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@ast
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@en
prefLabel
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@ast
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies
@en
P2093
Paavonen J
Stray-Pedersen B
Templeton A
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/STI.78.6.406
P577
2002-12-01T00:00:00Z