How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.
about
Enhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide--the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane LibraryAbsence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidenceEvidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: a systematic reviewInterventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese peopleHerbal preparations for uterine fibroidsBarriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisNegativland - a home for all findings in psychologyAcupuncture for ankle sprain: systematic review and meta-analysisCardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: network meta-analysisEffects of glucosamine, chondroitin, or placebo in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: network meta-analysisCaries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants on permanent teeth: An update of systematic review evidenceEmpirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological studyA systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back painTopical NSAIDs for acute pain: a meta-analysisTopical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysisA simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies.The effect of motor control exercise versus placebo in patients with chronic low back pain [ACTRN012605000262606].Pharmacopuncture in Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsFrom pre-registration to publication: a non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational dataWhat is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological studyImproving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checkingEffectiveness of Pilates exercise in treating people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviewsHerbal medicines for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trialsYoga for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisGlobal eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis of sequential therapyWhat can family physicians offer patients with carpal tunnel syndrome other than surgery? A systematic review of nonsurgical managementA descriptive analysis of oral health systematic reviews published 1991-2012: cross sectional studyIntegrating multiple data sources (MUDS) for meta-analysis to improve patient-centered outcomes research: a protocol for a systematic reviewChinese journals: a guide for epidemiologistsSystematic Review and Quality Appraisal of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Pharmacologic Maintenance Treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Methodological Considerations and RecommendationsMeta-regression analyses to explain statistical heterogeneity in a systematic review of strategies for guideline implementation in primary health care.Improving health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities: a systematic review of the best evidence regarding provider and organization interventionsA quantitative and qualitative evaluation of reports of clinical trials published in six Brazilian dental journals indexed in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological quality.Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies.Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials.LOC387715/HTRA1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to age-related macular degeneration: A HuGE review and meta-analysisDeveloping methods for systematic reviewing in health services delivery and organization: an example from a review of access to health care for people with learning disabilities. Part 2. Evaluation of the literature--a practical guideA systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trialsSystematic searches for the effectiveness of respite care.
P2860
Q21093215-3A50B145-1182-47B9-9C0D-77E27E4FE5B8Q21199591-E8BA6876-7D53-4126-B824-E3057D24FE5DQ21254585-1F3DA96B-3BF0-4310-BDB4-9BBDD77A3DC8Q24236596-8B4E37FD-20F5-4F6F-9870-FCBFF1B51A31Q24241248-593090A8-88A2-430D-A1C7-B9107EF862A3Q24288842-FB655388-2F83-4AA5-94F3-34C017DADBAAQ24288901-9BFB55D2-B2D4-42A0-A259-09F66F7435C3Q24599774-DC304BB2-73E7-42FA-990D-6C0571E53285Q24601392-F9CA7F3B-6DF2-4CC2-8174-591B81C062B3Q24606203-BB289765-6FBB-494D-8244-C8FBDA92957FQ24618451-5C618483-9C4C-46CD-BF27-6AE16BC48877Q24653790-23ACD025-CDAF-4500-B0A6-3A35286D13FBQ24657330-8F5FBBEA-0100-4FE5-AD1F-12EAB3EF5BA1Q24791078-A8E48829-C057-4AAC-9C4A-D2A98743B3A9Q24805319-BA6AA9CE-C52C-4E8F-9ACA-0FA56BEE6B81Q24810766-8E3093AF-B410-4619-AE82-D94CED2A00EBQ24811806-89768C24-7D5D-4EF5-9CB2-49F9A6EE8F7BQ26765835-190E22DA-AAD9-4E76-90A2-1FC1DF1506D5Q26779255-B5FA61E9-8B8E-427F-8C6D-71449125421AQ26785604-DFD49A0D-265C-4A72-A4D5-CBFD078D3258Q26862861-ABC7CD92-85E3-4316-9A52-FA4A2EACA8B2Q26865845-745C245A-A806-439C-BDE2-2C856AFE8B94Q27012917-D40C5BD0-2352-450F-B502-8ACCBD716BDBQ27027450-48C69029-FD75-4A19-98F3-04C4FC95CE10Q28296156-D3DC57A2-847C-4EA8-ADBD-F2CA92A40CADQ28388635-F4247623-9979-4832-84CD-121E67F6982BQ28533924-07E4F40F-CD75-426F-8B8E-45C1F7669D1CQ28608153-865233F7-C6ED-49F6-9B8C-6BD599615AAAQ28755328-C7A04C1E-7FFD-471E-AB45-8FC3754234F9Q30245662-0899794B-7FFC-49C8-A213-F86DDB546A1BQ30317003-57087C16-5069-4B82-A3D0-A5FFE2D1C517Q30477701-CC314C19-24A9-41DC-A09E-D1CA6BE81BD5Q30484513-B94897E2-B4B0-4402-9488-EA0D26979C8BQ30547519-0AB3ECF8-8A1A-4C0D-BFA1-38F5338A77D3Q30920608-52D474A3-FBB3-4A42-8216-81BB00D2967BQ31161134-3D64596D-341F-4EDC-9A41-D2537EDBE18DQ32125469-0B617D05-6785-4E2A-A55B-61F292DE13FCQ33210119-C4E7ABDB-3C6D-4D5B-842B-9ABDCB19584BQ33319558-4DFB43F1-E44C-4E29-8768-F70FABF7508FQ33326429-E8D5312A-1AC5-4AE6-A82C-9F7ED6191DD7
P2860
How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@ast
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@en
type
label
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@ast
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@en
prefLabel
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@ast
How important are comprehensiv ...... atic reviews? Empirical study.
@en
P2093
P1476
How important are comprehensiv ...... matic reviews? Empirical study
@en
P2093
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z