Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
about
Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital signResearch ethics committees: agents of research policy?A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trialsPatient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and howA practical approach to language complexity: a Wikipedia case studyThe impact of socioeconomic status on access to cancer clinical trialsBurdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reformQuality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sourcesReadability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Phase II-IV Clinical Trials in ChinaInformed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.Readability of state-sponsored advance directive forms in the United States: a cross sectional study.A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the NetherlandsResearch Participants' Understanding of and Reactions to Certificates of Confidentiality.Challenging the knowledge base and skillset for providing surgical consent by orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands: an identified area of improvement in patient safety.Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.Promoting health literacy.A recruiting failure turned success.A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb functionThe readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France.A randomized trial comparing concise and standard consent forms in the START trial.Patients' question-asking behavior during primary care visits: a report from the AAFP National Research Network.Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking.Local institutional review board (IRB) review of a multicenter trial: local costs without local context.Quality improvement ethics: lessons from the SUPPORT studyEthical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.Readability of the written study information in pediatric research in France.Biobanking, consent, and certificates of confidentiality: does the ANPRM muddy the water?A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose?--a randomized controlled trial.Uncovering health literacy: Developing a remotely administered questionnaire for determining health literacy levels in health disparate populations.Ethical issues at the interface of clinical care and research practice in pediatric oncology: a narrative review of parents' and physicians' experiences.How accessible was information about H1N1 flu? Literacy assessments of CDC guidance documents for different audiences.Repeated assessments of informed consent comprehension among HIV-infected participants of a three-year clinical trial in Botswana.A classification of errors in lay comprehension of medical documents.The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials.Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.'Who is Helsinki?' Sex workers advise improving communication for good participatory practice in clinical trialsInternet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: an observational analysis
P2860
Q24544727-959EEE9E-29FB-4609-BBAD-ACB039F9624BQ24815381-2B11118F-7C63-4E1E-AF45-66E74E38BAF0Q26745724-2261BB9C-D848-476A-93CC-3F70E9BFB673Q26750036-81E0B692-A82A-46A5-83B3-A8676FBC07BBQ26869122-358A9EC8-AD09-456A-8B39-7903B0487EA8Q26995858-9CF926F6-AF3B-4933-BD8C-D4AA1020905FQ27027684-77A23CE2-8AAC-4B3A-B248-3BBBCFBEB2EBQ28255338-99A08F8C-DF98-4E63-8815-294E7F6041B6Q28554472-EAA322D3-0A69-46AB-AC10-A7818C7204E5Q30364395-3AE5F36F-2EC7-40C5-9BBD-EE2B5429159FQ30478688-98C37A58-3C24-4932-BA20-1F1AA81B9B74Q30479131-524AE36C-4B45-42F3-8A02-54E0615A84BBQ30494466-590B42D6-C8E1-4CE1-8F11-ACCBA5305735Q30552414-02880D6C-77DB-48EC-A502-8655A5AFD9B5Q30572143-8FBBC679-BEAD-4847-A631-5058CA5150A6Q30825503-0BDF3C28-7638-4A24-8E81-CCA020A4F9F2Q30847882-9F831422-1FB5-49D9-8EE4-26B0A488E699Q33209296-C246A6A5-F83C-434E-A05D-D22DAB2390E7Q33325801-0F35D49E-9D4D-435E-B2E8-AF690087B6BEQ33519743-997B09F6-239D-425C-952B-7E6D3F10725CQ33582098-5AC9E190-8904-48F5-8085-F88852197470Q33606384-D4284684-CA87-45F6-8746-B120A53A10C8Q33711973-FF602186-A564-4BFF-916E-82E07E2E680EQ33719347-2EED94F3-CF63-46E4-9972-3A78AD1FED82Q33764475-A4FA959F-20C1-4F9D-B40A-274877EF569DQ33829407-D1009846-588B-4384-8068-3AB76763E84AQ33847797-DE373BD7-7973-4B1A-B123-1708D1A192BBQ33873781-A7A1A16F-A326-4FD1-B33A-01066605C51FQ33933642-679FE2E6-164D-4685-878A-6358D5015EAEQ33956512-469EAE34-32D8-4D06-B90D-58B3CE3C9166Q33967348-DABC25D9-396D-436E-B902-EE481E252E63Q34026763-F9AD524C-B2AD-4D15-AB34-0040296DE221Q34029658-6DD8378B-3B2E-4A11-A27D-8E7F7F765F16Q34062183-ABFD3180-1152-4A6B-8BFD-C05716870729Q34064272-B2DAD045-F215-45C7-A38E-93B617BFB5CCQ34394590-22EA9ADC-35CF-48AE-A21A-BE5EF3E6BA6BQ34433816-8037D98D-3251-4A64-A56A-E175788C71C5Q34667656-7E5EB25E-F446-444D-A3F5-B18C4A48C217Q34996417-5EEB5469-ED94-4284-8309-616819302286Q34998253-0C7A4783-9603-4BBD-BF35-293F34A765BD
P2860
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Փետրուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի փետրվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@ast
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@en
type
label
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@ast
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@en
prefLabel
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@ast
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@en
P921
P356
P1476
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.
@en
P2093
Frederick L Brancati
Holly A Taylor
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMSA021212
P407
P577
2003-02-01T00:00:00Z