Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35069904

about

Feasibility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Ischemic Stroke Territory Recognition Based on Two-Dimensional Projections of Three-Dimensional Diffusion MRI Data.Evaluation of the fully automated BD MAX Cdiff and Xpert C. difficile assays for direct detection of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens Cost and Impact on Patient Length of Stay of Rapid Molecular Testing for Clostridium difficile Clinical characteristics of patients who test positive for Clostridium difficile by repeat PCR.Multicenter clinical evaluation of the portrait toxigenic C. difficile assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains in clinical stool specimens.Community-Acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection: Awareness and Clinical Implications Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: an ongoing conundrum for clinicians and for clinical laboratories.Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.Alerting physicians during electronic order entry effectively reduces unnecessary repeat PCR testing for Clostridium difficile.A novel subtyping assay for detection of Clostridium difficile virulence genes.Impact of change to molecular testing for Clostridium difficile infection on healthcare facility-associated incidence rates.Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.New drugs and strategies for management of Clostridium difficile colitis.Combination of culture, antigen and toxin detection, and cytotoxin neutralization assay for optimal Clostridium difficile diagnostic testing.Sample-to-result molecular infectious disease assays: clinical implications, limitations and potential.Optimizing the diagnostic testing of Clostridium difficile infection.Performance of Hepatitis E Virus (HEV)-antibody tests: a comparative analysis based on samples from individuals with direct contact to domestic pigs or wild boar in Germany.Evaluation of the performance of C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE and its usefulness in a hospital setting with a high prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection.Comparison of BD Max Cdiff and GenomEra C. difficile molecular assays for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stools in conventional sample containers and in FecalSwabs.Comparison of GenomEra C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile as confirmatory tests in a multistep algorithm for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-based method for selectively detecting vegetative cells of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.Clostridium difficile infections in solid organ transplantation.An unusual cause of false-positive results with the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay.Use of electronic surveillance to drive improvement in hospital infection rates.Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: there is light at the end of the colon.Simultaneous detection and characterization of toxigenic Clostridium difficile directly from clinical stool specimens.Evaluation of three enzyme immunoassays and a loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.Portrait Toxigenic Clostridium difficile assay, an isothermal amplification assay detects toxigenic C. difficile in clinical stool specimens.Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the xpert Clostridium difficile assay and its comparison with the toxin A/B enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and in-house real-time PCR assay used for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile.Similar outcomes of IBD inpatients with Clostridium difficile infection detected by ELISA or PCR assay.Detection of common diarrhea-causing pathogens in Northern Taiwan by multiplex polymerase chain reaction.Early Results of Fecal Microbial Transplantation Protocol Implementation at a Community-based University Hospital.

P2860

Q27318466-DCD870DF-4870-43A9-A73E-CCFB2D05AC4E Q34628889-184DF1F9-CDFC-4A1E-951C-0339D1889092 Q34726112-2B295CAE-4AD5-4126-88DE-188169C0797E Q35035947-C6A3144F-F292-450E-B160-FDDD5F5CC7B3 Q36413953-4F40344F-81A1-4C78-8933-86517EFC1CEA Q36961050-F3F92A31-8D8A-494A-B670-B7C45B4B72A3 Q37035829-5CCEECC5-9045-4335-B976-DF94030E2518 Q37125031-289543CA-08A4-4F7D-88AE-D6536B56878B Q37470515-51712A2C-9ED0-4FE1-9C88-5BA80162BC22 Q37608243-6C99BE35-8A14-48F6-B60B-39E075AB0D62 Q37667082-0261E27A-BF35-4BC0-9443-7829AD986E44 Q38024184-2A8A6E49-74F1-455E-8D15-C87A94EDCC4C Q38113471-81E05937-0467-463A-932A-DB0FEEA1D04D Q38178254-77E37AD9-D68E-4571-87DF-63D91395648F Q38675080-CB41F30A-0DC3-4FA3-9915-FC5E40188769 Q38909959-45BE30EC-F679-44E1-95C5-D44546B90ECB Q40248978-D5CC883E-7EC6-4D09-8699-CFC6AB371AFB Q40541130-54630696-FF53-4D08-BA05-CEEC21E101AF Q41524782-9E965264-6088-4D0B-A40C-E5E5883401D6 Q41665158-5C45FD9F-874A-4039-94B8-E5142F95DA0F Q42200813-B4485EA0-E3AE-405D-8F52-2931EF33560B Q42272356-AEEC4C29-43B5-4D5A-A388-EB4175AE015F Q43147006-54C810BD-35D5-448F-A8A3-DC4219BC079D Q43532367-27D948A2-7657-4658-8BF4-4C5AB071E83B Q44088970-154305AC-233C-4404-914D-FB74AD25CAF9 Q46277734-EB9B80E9-C66B-47B9-BAA9-BE0ADA6B9234 Q51353976-3FC03910-B93F-4129-A6C0-923E99093FB0 Q51525731-CD89438A-9088-4A94-A12D-C85F04A36E6A Q53643461-B5E1ACFE-892F-4AB3-8873-6480FCD05DF5 Q54266935-14CC10FA-3459-488C-A67A-6E27E8982EB3 Q55314703-5E8F0547-CABD-4BFE-A564-CEB82BB7CE77 Q55419358-4817F129-B12E-4368-9684-1CCF80BB3600

P2860

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35069904

description

2011 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2011 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2011 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2011年の論文

@ja

2011年学术文章

@wuu

2011年学术文章

@zh-cn

2011年学术文章

@zh-hans

2011年学术文章

@zh-my

2011年学术文章

@zh-sg

2011年學術文章

@yue

name

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@ast

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@en

type

label

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@ast

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@en

prefLabel

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@ast

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@en

P1433

Q35069904-18496F76-8776-4FD2-AFAE-CCE61DC75227

P1476

Q35069904-AB6C4467-6ECA-4884-B9EA-8929649574CB

P2093

Q35069904-4699E9DA-0548-4790-832D-BA5DD095042A

Q35069904-B9396575-16BB-4F54-9646-C34C02447364

Q35069904-DC22882D-0C41-4739-8ED1-D28ACB1810BC

Q35069904-EDF08198-9C7D-4DE2-B0DB-0EE4E410E2D0

P2860

Q35069904-0D674459-0FBE-4EE4-A156-4897652A42B3

Q35069904-3039D96F-E1D5-46FA-85CA-B592EF1A1112

Q35069904-36FF0F2B-6E90-4EB6-B48B-C41906D20D87

Q35069904-3A5EE277-2563-49FD-89D0-63B1BE4A042C

Q35069904-52F66427-FE5F-490B-A827-2BE766942B51

Q35069904-623570DE-6643-4D91-881A-A67667F049EB

Q35069904-723F39E6-26CA-4C4F-8E68-A7FBF97B1100

Q35069904-749A8EA0-93C5-4AF2-A2A1-40CC587096F0

Q35069904-76019D13-835F-493A-87AC-DC2ED67CDE8B

Q35069904-953BC98B-0E28-4757-A5B2-5C0F41D7DD1B

P304

Q35069904-6BC628F2-71D9-4883-82DF-63BA10C5B8D3

P31

Q35069904-84CF42C5-7285-408B-A0B5-58CAD8994FC5

P356

Q35069904-414D29AF-BA36-4651-ADAE-35E43E0C9A41

P433

Q35069904-0EBCB08A-4A3A-4D50-A234-2DB98E6D50D9

P478

Q35069904-72DEECC8-6785-4ED8-875E-F829C884DA6A

P577

Q35069904-013DF3B4-6C72-4984-8893-91449D733138

P5875

Q35069904-12D37776-F6C3-4A1A-A87E-9D9113F9F7F9

P698

Q35069904-44EE13B5-E1B1-4E65-B434-BD6F21083965

P932

Q35069904-04640934-A605-4BAF-BF95-2F5595D76A8A

P356

J.JMOLDX.2011.03.004

P1433

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

P1476

Comparison of five assays for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

@en

P2093

Fongman Wu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kimberle C Chapin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Roberta A Dickenson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sarah B Andrea

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Clostridium difficile Infections: What Every Clinician Should Know

Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease.

"I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Recognition and prevention of hospital-associated enteric infections in the intensive care unit

Review of current literature on the economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection.

Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?

Clostridium difficile: an update for the primary care clinician.

Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.

P304

395-400

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.JMOLDX.2011.03.004

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

13

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-04-29T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

51248907

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21704273

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3123782

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string